Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I agree with my site team colleague above. We need to know all the facts including which company you are dealing with and an explanation of the problem. It really is too difficult to start giving speculative advice on some speculative problem that you have laid out as a generalised scenario
    • Moorcroft are sending a rep round to my house this week. What is the best way to handle this? Ignore and not answer the door or engage with them? I haven't acknowledged anything since I started on this journey and defaulted on my cards in December 2022
    • Very sorry but with the best will in the world, I don't think we can at all understand what the situation is here. Please can you try rewriting this on a word processor and maybe send a copy of what you have written to a friend and working out together so that the story is complete but as brief as possible. Maybe a list of dates as well. If you can do that and then repost your story we can have a look
    • Hi, I am a local authority tenant and was in a 3 bed house. At the end of last year, my last child moved out and so did my spouse as we are now going through a divorce which meant that I was in the house alone and decided that I needed to downsize not only for myself but to offer the property to a family that needed it. I registered on the local authority housing bidding site as i was asked to do and I was accepted and given a priority banding as I was downsizing and they were desperate for my house. I have been extremely lucky and after about 6 weeks was accepted for a new build from a housing association via the housing gateway. I viewed the property 2 weeks ago and had to sign the tenancy last week when they were doing bulk signups for the houses and that is the day I moved. In between viewing and sign up, I contacted my current local authority landlord and asked how I give notice as I had been accepted for a property I had bid on and was moving.  The lady told me how to do it online and then said that I needed to give a full weeks notice which wasnt a problem as I had enough time.  (I was also told a weeks notice was what i would need to give by another staff member about a month ago when I phoned up for another housing related question.  I dont have any of this in writing.) I have now moved, handed back the keys and I am now being told that I need to give 4 weeks notice which I cannot afford. I hav e spoken to the council again explaining that I was told a week and that to be honest, if I knew they were going to charge me 4 weeks I would not have been able to move and would have stayed in the other house.  I thought I was doing the right thing. They said that calls are recorded and they asked me when I called in and was told a week and they would listen to the telephone conversation and if it was correct what I was told, they would see what they could do to reduce the notice period. They have now emailed me back and said that they have listened to the conversation and the lady said 4 weeks notice and I am liable for 4 weeks rent.  Now I may well of misheard her when I thought she said a full weeks notice she may have said 4 weeks notice but I am sure she said a full weeks notice and i was told a week by another member of staff a few weeks ago. I have emailed her back and said that I may of misheard but I would like to listen to the phone recording myself.  As yet they havent responded. I think its unreasonable for them to make me give 4 weeks when I had to sign the new tenancy with little notice or loose the property.  And it was all done through their gateway, and they will have a tenant in there pretty much straight away getting rent from them. I am on a very low income, I am on my own, I have serious medical issues and I am really getting myself stressed out over this. Any advice would be so appreciated.  Can I insist they let me listed to the recording? RH  
    • Susan Crichton is at the Inquiry today. She seems to have trouble remembering a lot of things but seems to find it easier if it's something that shows her in a good light.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

my friend who works as a security guard


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5401 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

well, after having a lengthy conversation with one of the mangers this morning, the matter is now "under investigation", and they have asked that i go back this time next week, primarily to process my fast tracked JSA claim (fast track eh?, takes em over a week to sort out, *sigh*), but also to inform me of the findings of the investigation.

 

I have asked that any findings and a report etc be put in writing for me to be able to take a copy away.

 

so, they have a week to think up a good excuse

 

Good on you for asking for it in writing!! If you find they don't put it in writing, insist. You have handed them an official letter of complaint, you have the right to a reply addressing the nature of the complaint and any subsequent action taken as a result of your complaint in writing, no matter what the outcome is, you have that right of written correspondance.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Dunno if this would be of interest to you, godpikachu: Jobcentre Plus - Our Charter

 

Specifically :

 

Our responsibilities to you

We will:

 

 

  • treat you with respect - Not fulfilled
  • be fair and helpful - Not fulfilled
  • treat you as an individual by giving you the service you need
  • behave professionally - Not fulfilled
  • take responsibility when dealing with you, making sure we do whatever is needed - Not fulfilled
  • make sure our offices are welcoming and pleasant. This includes having private interview rooms and, if the office has space, more facilities such as children’s play areas, and;
  • make sure our offices are as safe as possible for all our customers and staff.

Fill in the blanks!

Edited by ErikaPNP

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Our responsibilities to you

We will:

 

 

  • treat you with respect - Not fulfilled
  • be fair and helpful - Not fulfilled
  • treat you as an individual by giving you the service you need
  • behave professionally - Not fulfilled
  • take responsibility when dealing with you, making sure we do whatever is needed - Not fulfilled
  • make sure our offices are welcoming and pleasant. This includes having private interview rooms and, if the office has space, more facilities such as children’s play areas, and; not fulfilled
  • make sure our offices are as safe as possible for all our customers and staff.

Fill in the blanks!

 

 

aside from the above, JCPs "responsibilities" are largley governed by what is referred to as the "jobseekers agreement".

 

This document requires the signature of both the jobseeker and a member of JCP staff for it to be legally acceptable, and once done it acts as a form of contract between the JCP and the claimant.

 

Simply put, the jobseekers agreement is a one sided piece of paper focused around absolving JCP of doing anything other than dictating terms to the claimant. at no point in the agreement does it mention any responsibilities burdened on JCP, however the list of responsibilities burdened on the claimant are substancial, for example, it states that you must apply for at least 4 positions per week, and that said applications be made to "suitable" employers.

 

in theory this is fine, however in practice it ignores several key factors, such as availability of suitable employment.

for example, my jobseekers agreement states that i will apply for full time positions in admin, customer service or IT, however availability of these jobs at the moment is almost none existant, so therefore, i cannot fulfill the agreement, however, should i state that i am unable to comply with this agreement, then i will forfeit any entitlement to benefits.

 

in addition, nowhere in any of the literature i have ever been given give details of any additional things i may claim for, such as rent/council tax allowance, clothing vouchers, assistance with learning etc, and, although i am aware of these additional items existance, i do not have access to them due to JCP staff being poorly trained to manage requests for them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pik, I'd just go straight to your MP, and the local press. Imagine the headline. Basically, in this time of economic crisis, you have gone out and finally got a job, only to have the JCP accuse you of benefit fraud, and got you the sack, all of which is down to their own incompetence. Don't let them get away with it, mate!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd definitely go to the press as well as your MP. Another thought is to get any paperwork the job centre and your former employer have on you. I don't know whether an SAR would be any use? Just thinking out loud here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

just to provide an update to this.

 

firstly, i got out of hospital a couple of days back so i havent had time to do much posting or anything.

Why was i in hospital?, well, i got myself into such a state the other week that i went out and got rather drunk, and then as i was making my way home, i was attacked by a gang of youths intent on mugging me, and recieved some very serious injuries.

 

 

 

anyway, the "investigation" is still ongoing, as JCP have yet to establish who it was that made the call to my former employer, which is a load of rubbish as it will quite clearly state who was the investigating officer on the records.

They also made mention of it possibly not being someone at my local jobcentre, and that it was possibly someone at the areas admin centre, to which i told them i was not willing to make ANOTHER complaint to them, i had made my formal complaint to JCP and it will be handled at my convenience, not theirs.

 

i have spoken to my local MP who says he will have a look into the situation once i have recieved a final notice of JCPs findings, which to be honest i doubt i will ever recieve as from the reaction i got last time i called in and asked to speak to the manager, they are quite clearly just trying to sweep the issue under the carpet and hoping ill go away.

 

i also spoke to my former employers and informed them of the situation, but they arent interested and have told me in no uncertain terms that i am not to contact them at all anymore.

 

theres nothing more i can do really, it seems that "the system" is good at protecting its own, much better than some useless individual that lets himself get beat up by a bunch of chavs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to hear about the assault.

 

Hope you are recovering well.

 

Stay positive.

 

Che

...................................................................... [FONT=Comic Sans MS]Please post on a thread before sending a PM. My opinion's are not expressed as agent or representative of The Consumer Action Group. Always seek professional advice from a qualified legal adviser before acting. If I have helped you please feel free to click on the black star.[/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS] I am sorry that work means I don't get into the Employment Forum as often as I would like these days, but nonetheless I'll try to pop in when I can.[/FONT] [FONT=Arial Black][FONT=Comic Sans MS][COLOR=Red]'Venceremos' :wink:[/COLOR][/FONT][/FONT]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gosh - I'm so sorry to hear about whats happened - I hope you are recovering GP.

 

Never mind about the JobCentre - you'll be pushing up daisies before they admit to whoever did this. I personally would now inform the Press about whats happening - it will at least get people squirming - at the moment the Government don't need all this bad publicity - what have you to lose? It may just trigger an investigation into this appalling mess.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No don't give up! You've been badly wronged and that needs to be put right. I've subscribed and keep looking for updates, but can't offer much except true support - employment law is not my field!

 

I think you should contact them once more, in person, and tell them that if this matter is not resolved in the next seven days you will contact the press, because of course, you wouldn't want this to happen to anyone else would you?! Before this see if you can interest the local paper to start with, tell them everything, including the seven day dead line you have now given the job centre.

 

Your thread grabbed my attention immediately, if you can get a good story in the paper, many others will be grabbed by it to.

 

And I would write to the PM, copied into whoever deals with the JobCentre at this level. - you may laugh but I wrote to him about HB and my elderly parents and I couldn't believe it when not only did I get a reply, from his office, but the problem was sorted within two days of that letter arriving and involved HB having to personally apologise to my mum for distress caused.

 

You are so in the right here, and my motto is never, never give up when you have right on your side. Even in you win only because you have brow beaten everyone into submission!

 

You could also visit your GP in a state of utmost despondency and say something about this has dented your confidence, you have been humiliated beyond reason, so on and so forth. That will be purely the Job Centres fault;)

 

Good luck and I'll keep watching for updates - give em hell!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a thought. Maybe the company you worked for made up the story in order to lay you off as they discovered they could not afford to take on another employee.

 

 

if this was the case then surely the dole office would be scrambling to protest their innocence?.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

i had a similar situation a while ago because i was signing on for 6 months i was entitled to a months bus pass, 100 pound job grant and a months run on housing benefit.\The lady dealing with me was unaware of this, i had to print it off online to show her! Now for some unknown reason the lady in the job centre ticked a box on the form saying i wouldnt be working more than 5 weeks. which of course was rubbish. So i didnt get a thing. My housing benefit was stopped i was expected to live on nothing and get to work with nothing when this shouldnt have been the case. I was told bvy the job centre to "ring this number" which incidently was an 0845 number and cost me a fortune. I was told 27 times "well ring you back" unsuprisingly they never did. in the mean time my housing benefit has been stopped and im getting demands from my landlord. Eventually i had to take a few days off work to go the CAB. THey didnt even bother to ring the CAB back. So i had to take more time off work or loose my flat. In the end i got sacked becdause i was never there. I went into the job centre to demand to see the moron who made the cock up. I was told, no matter what time of day i went in "shes on her lunch" i put in a complaint to the job centre office and jupitor house who were dealing with me. That was in dec and i havnt recieved a reply from either. After putting the complaint in the job centre rang me up and screamed down the phone at me "how dare you complain about my staff" . |I live over the road from there now and i make it my purpose in life to bring them down. Ive been in the CAB today and the lady who helped me over the job centre has said she has had loads in with exactly the same problem from the same job centre. They are a disgrace. Dont give up mate if you do they will do it again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

hi there, i need a really quick answer on this one.

 

 

 

my friend was employed at on the 25th of october 2008 at a care home as a gardener/caretaker/driver.

he has never been given any kind of formal contract but he was given an introductory letter outlining his duties.

 

he has had no problems at all until today (08/7/09), when he was told by one of the head carers that from now on he is no longer the caretaker but is now instead a care assistant.

 

he has confronted the managment about this sudden and complete change of duties but they say that they made the decision on monday and he has to abide by it.

 

he is not qualified or trained to be a carer or nurse to mentally disabled or impared people, and he has no interest in being a care assistant either.

 

 

 

as you can tell, he does not have the full 12 months under his belt for tribunal action but surely they cannot make such a massive alteration to his job role/t&cs??

 

 

help please...ASAP :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

as you can tell, he does not have the full 12 months under his belt for tribunal action but surely they cannot make such a massive alteration to his job role/t&cs??

 

Indeed GP he does not. Thus the question is more one of, 'Should the employer unilaterally alter the contract of employment and thus breach the same, what can the short-service employee do?'

 

As you are well aware, with less than 12 months service, unless an exemption can be relied on to bring a claim for unfair dismissal, the answer is very little.

 

He is in a very weak position unfortunately - can he some how link this to an exemption?

 

Che

...................................................................... [FONT=Comic Sans MS]Please post on a thread before sending a PM. My opinion's are not expressed as agent or representative of The Consumer Action Group. Always seek professional advice from a qualified legal adviser before acting. If I have helped you please feel free to click on the black star.[/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS] I am sorry that work means I don't get into the Employment Forum as often as I would like these days, but nonetheless I'll try to pop in when I can.[/FONT] [FONT=Arial Black][FONT=Comic Sans MS][COLOR=Red]'Venceremos' :wink:[/COLOR][/FONT][/FONT]

Link to post
Share on other sites

He is in a very weak position unfortunately - can he some how link this to an exemption?

 

Che

 

 

ive PMed you some details, as he doesnt want the full thing discussing in public...., might be something, might be nothing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...