Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

various RBS/Tesco debt - default notices


andyr666
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5427 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This is my first post on this excellent forum, even though I have been lurking for sometime.

 

Today I received a demand letter from Tesco Personal Finance regarding an unsecured loan that I have with them, this in itself did not concern me as such as I am currently suffering financial problems and have been operating a DMP through CCCS for the past 2 months. What does concern (rather madden) me is the language that Tesco have used in this letter.

 

- Legal action which may involve bankruptcy or repossession proceedings

- Enforcement/recovery action which may involve attachment/arrestment of wages, seizure of assets or repossession

- Passing details to Debt Recovery Agents to pursue you for repayment, which may involve personal visits to your home.

 

Is this type of language deemed to be acceptable? For instance, I was under the impression that attachment of earnings orders are only dispensed by the courts and only after a CCJ order has been ignored. I am really angry at the way Tesco have approached this matter and would like to send a strongly worded letter to make my feelings known. Any help in this matter would be very gratefully received.

 

Thanks

 

Andyr666

Link to post
Share on other sites

They 'may' self-combust and be never heard of again, but that's just as likely as them taking any direct action on many of the lines they suggest.

 

Their course of action would be to go to a Debt Collection Agency (DCA) and get them to chase you, but mention this to CCCS as they may have ideas of their own about how Tesco can or cannot conduct their business when they are already dealing with the matter.

Edited by hillards
dropped spill chucker on flore an it broak

Be good to those who give you advice that helps - click the star to give them your thanks by way of a reputation credit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry andy but tescos letter is quite usual for debt collection proceedures , threats threats and more threats, just wait until the debt collecting agents are involved and laugh at some of the rubbish they threaten you with ,luckily you have found this site and will be able to judge that most of the threats are not to be taken too seriously .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

My wife and I were on a debt management plan with CCCS (since decided to "go alone"), all creditors had been informed and the only people who did not accept our re-payment plan at the time were Tesco Personal Finance. In October last year and within a month of being informed that we were on a DMP Tesco PF sent a letter saying that "they were pleased to confirm the offer a refinance loan" --a loan that neither my wife or I asked for. I thought that it was strange at the time and wrote to TPF to try to ascertain what was going off, I haven't had a reply. The loan was taken out in June 2006 and I have not bothered sending a SAR or CCA request as I thought that all paperwork would be in order.....maybe not. Its got to be worth a tenner just to find out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Milly

 

I have just received a CCA from Mint relating to a card that my wife took out in 2004 that is similar to yours in that the image is also miniscule. I have managed to blow it up and the agreement looks fine but what strikes me as odd is that enclosed with this agreement was an up-to-date copy of the cards T&Cs as opposed to those that existed at the time that the agreement was signed...this got me thinking. It seems to me that maybe Mint do not have the actual original copies of the signed agreements anymore and are having to rely solely on microfiche images to fulfill their CCA request obligations. Surely if they had the originals RBS/Mint would be supplying full sized copies of that original rather than the postage stamp versions taken from microfiche. If this is the case how do they stand legally? If they are not able to produce the original agreement in court is that agreement unenforceable?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could someone with superior knowledge to me (not difficult) please tell me how many default notices for a single debt that it is normal to receive? Mrs Andyr666 and I have received 3 default notices each since October 2008 for a joint debt, does any one know which of these default notices takes presidence?, does the last one supersede all the others?

 

Many thanks for any help

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks 42man. I have previously read through some of the threads you have highlighted and to be quite honest they have raised more questions than answers...this is all very new and alien to me :-) When you say that you "cannot get defaulted for the same debt twice" what does that practically mean? Does the issuing of multiple default notices restrict the creditors ability to enforce a debt. These default notices came from 3 different offices within RBS, obviously a case of the right hand not knowing what the left is doing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is true that a default can not be issued fo the same debt twice. I am having this issue resolved at the moment. Had a default on my report for a debt from barclays who later sold the debt on to a debt collector who put another default on for the same debt. Barclays should have removed the origional default when they sold the debt on. My advice is to contact experian (www.experian.co.uk) its free to join for the first month, give them a call and they will do the work for you. They are currently contacting barclays for me to request they move the origional default. Just waiting for the confirmation email.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Sorry for the late reply.

Here it is;

 

The Data Controller/Compliance. The Royal Bank of Scotland plc, 36 St Andrew Square, Edinburgh,EH2 2YB. A fee may be payable.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I received a similar application form for an Advanta card (1998) in response to my CCA request to Mint...I sent the go forth and multiply letter 3 weeks ago and await further developments so this thread is of great interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tesco PF are not very good at the default thing, and it is not through lack of practice. My wife and I have been issued 3 each and all flawed like yours for one joint debt

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hello Everyone

 

I know that a creditor can terminate a credit card agreement, but what is the process when it is a loan agreement rather than a CC...does the creditor just have to demand full payment for the agreement to in effect be terminated? (after a default notice of course)

 

Thanks for any help

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

DinkJames

 

How strange that you should bring this up now. About 6 weeks ago my wife and I both received statements from TPF relating to the perio Sept 08 to beginning of MAy this year. As far as I am aware it is the first time that I have received statements regarding this loan which was taken out in 2006. I will be watching this thread with some interest :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good morning folks,

 

The moment we've all been waiting for (or at least I was). Today I received a draft judgement from the court which I summarise as below:

 

a) in regards to the agreement itself. The T&C does not refer to me by name or indeed in any other way. Also the judge stated that he was asked to accept that I became party to the agreement by clicking the box, whilst that may have signifies my agreement to the T&Cs, it looks to him that this is not what S61(1) of the Act envisaged.

 

b) in regards to the DN, having read the Woodchester case, the judge stated he can do no better than refer to the words of Kennedy LJ regarding individuals & large corporation. In fact my case is even clearer than the woodchester because isntead of carrying out calculation of the amount, all the Claimant had to do was to ensure that I had the required full 14 days of in which to comply woth th enotice.

 

So because of mainly these points above, he dismiss the application with there being a real prospect of the defence succeeding.

 

As this is a draft judgement, the handed down judgment day will be on the 24th August.

 

Well done Mrs Z...I am the proud owner of a defective default and termination by Tesco Personal Finance and this thread gives me real hope

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to various RBS/Tesco debt - default notices
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...