Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just like last time, Evri requested more time so they have another 2 weeks
    • Just an update, finance company rejected my complaint saying they've found damage but can't tell when it's from even though I've shown them how the front end is misaligned in the advert photos compared to another identical model car they're selling.  Dealership now want to charge me to get the car brought back to me but will only discuss over the phone which seems off. They're also saying no damaged was picked up by JLR main dealership before I purchased it but my local JLR dealerships till this day haven't mentioned the damage to me because they don't go into stuff like that for some reason lol  Ombudsman case is still open, not sure if I should leave the car with them or just pay to have it brought back.
    • Hi all, I get esa and pip,  I have £1200 in arrears that I owed my ex partner, I have been paying £100 per month to clear this debt that was setup by standing order, as I have complex needs I forgot about this standing order and have overpaid mainternance by around £4000, I told CSA I am happy for my ex partner to keep overpayment I do not wish to seek anything back, however they have declined to take of the sum of £1200 and are still saying I owe this to my ex partner. In my second question it was announced that pip would stop for mental health, I don't understand the link below Disability benefits system to be reviewed as PM outlines "moral mission" to reform welfare - GOV.UK WWW.GOV.UK The Prime Minister has outlined a package of sweeping reforms to put work at the heart of welfare and... Does this mean my money is going to stop? I have spoken to my key worker and I am already recieveing help from mental health team and complex needs team along with connections and mind, I just don't get what is going on.
    • No, i haven't had one for about 10+ years. I am thinking of just going to the court in person and pay at the counter
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

welcome finance ppi - ive issued a court claim!


andie_303
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5188 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thanks PF - I may try writing to them as well as see if they are prepared to 'name and shame' the figures on a particular company I am after - if they are going to publish it anyway you would think they could have no reason to refuse this

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 211
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

It would be so interesting to get all sorts of stats from the FOS but as it is a private arrangement within the finance industry, the FOI doesn't apply.

Write to them and ask them but it will be interesting to see how - if at all they justify their refusal

 

In light of the present PPI reclaim and credit meldown I believe the FOS are more than happy to present figures on their performance.

 

This is the latest Annual Review for 2008/2009.

 

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.u.../ar09/ar09.pdf

 

Regards

 

PF

 

My guess is there will be a rather large increase in the figures released next year on PPI mis-selling. That is if the credit crunch does not deplete the staff numbers employed by the FOS which must have surely increased dramatically looking at the link above.

 

Point here is keep up the pressure and if the FOS need more recruits to get results then so be it. PPI reclaiming successes through the FOS are definately increasing but the time scale is still wearing folks down.

 

aa

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

89% claims currently being upheld - yikes!!

 

Thanks AA - I bypassed FOS purely because of the time scales but unfortunately small claims is quite scary to someone like me so I'm trying to get all my reasearch in before my court date and would just like to give the judge a little reminder about some figures for these dodgy policies and thought you can't really argue with the FOS figures.

 

I'm gonna get in touch with them tommorow and ask for figures on the rascal of a company and see what they say.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good Luck with that andie and if you do get them please do post up here as im sure we would all like to know even if its not the company we are dealing with.

 

Regards

 

PF

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andie:)

 

Will be following your progress with interest (contractual preferably, lol!) on this one as I think you're talking about my fave bank too!

 

Regards,

 

Landy x

LTSB PPI on various loans (current/settled) - Refunded inc 8%

 

MBNA 1 Charges - Refunded inc CI

 

MBNA 1 PPI - Refunded

 

MBNA 2 Charges - Refunded inc 8%

 

MBNA 2 PPI - Refunded

 

MBNA 2 Accident Ins - Refunded

 

Swift Advances (settled) Mortgage Charges -Partially refunded

 

Swift Advances (settled) Mortgage PPI - Refunded inc CI & 8%

 

Sainsburys (settled) Loan PPI - Refunded inc CI +8%

 

Sainsburys (closed) Card Charges - Refunded inc CI + 8%

 

M&S Money (closed) Card Charges - Refunded inc CI

 

M&S Money (closed) Card PPI - Refunded inc 8%

 

Direct Line (settled) Loan PPI - Refunded inc CI + 8%

 

Debenhams Card (closed) PPI - Refunded inc 8%

 

Swift Mortgage Charges -Refunded

 

Hitachi Finance (closed) Charges - Refunded

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was wondering if anyone had links or information on the number of single premium PPI cases the FOS upheld in the years 2006-7 2007-8 2008-9??

 

Also does anyone know if it is possible to ascertain % figures for individual companies they have upheld??

 

Thank you

 

As alanalana has said the details of PPI complaints are held within their annual review

2006/07

annual review 2006/07

2007/08

annual review 2007/08

And Alanalana has posted on the 2008/09 review link

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Tracey - I'm due back in court with them in August but I am also taking another case of action against them to - not just PPI now - they have narked me off so I'm going after them for something else as well that could see them having to pay SUBSTANTIAL damages if they don't buck up their ideas.

 

I can't really say what it is at the moment as walls have ears and forums have unwelcome eyes but as soon as it's done I will spill all - promise

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Tracey - I'm due back in court with them in August but I am also taking another case of action against them to - not just PPI now - they have narked me off so I'm going after them for something else as well that could see them having to pay SUBSTANTIAL damages if they don't buck up their ideas.

 

I can't really say what it is at the moment as walls have ears and forums have unwelcome eyes but as soon as it's done I will spill all - promise

Andrea,

 

Just to let you know if you take legal action for anything, even if the claim is below £5k in value, and allocated to the small claims track, you can risk costs against you if you lose, under CPR 27.14[2][g].

 

I seriously suggest that before taking any claims for damages against Welcome you get relevant legal advice.

 

legalpickle

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

:!: All the information I impart is my advice based on my experience. It does not constitute professional advice. If in doubt, always consult with a professional. :!:

 

:-) If you feel my post has been helpful, please click my scales. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Legal

 

Thanks for the advice - I'm not too worried though :D

Ok. Just as long as you're aware.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

:!: All the information I impart is my advice based on my experience. It does not constitute professional advice. If in doubt, always consult with a professional. :!:

 

:-) If you feel my post has been helpful, please click my scales. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

FOS tell me they are aiming to name and shame in September and I asked them if I could have the figures on the institution I wanted and they said they didn't think that would be possible until they are officially published but told me to put my request in writing.

 

I have done so and got a response saying my query was being looked in to - nothing further since.

Link to post
Share on other sites

FOS tell me they are aiming to name and shame in September and I asked them if I could have the figures on the institution I wanted and they said they didn't think that would be possible until they are officially published but told me to put my request in writing.

 

I have done so and got a response saying my query was being looked in to - nothing further since.

 

Any official response on this must surely merit an immediate post in very large letters :eek:

 

aa

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quick question and I hope you will forgive me being a little cryptic but I knwo the company I am dealing with trawls this site so I am being a little careful.

 

I have in my posession 2 documents that detail something that said company should have declared when I made an agreement with them.

 

The 2 documents I have do not relate to me or my agreement but they go to prove something that I allege in my POC. These have been provided to me by 2 different people and in no way are they marked private and confidential without prejudice or anything along these lines.

 

Would I be able to use these documents in court?

 

Sorry - if this is too cryptic I will try and rephrase :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd say YES !!! and that money is yours.....it potentially taints the contract too if it is a 'secret' commission....!!! It should have been disclosed as part of a multiple agreement...!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I well aware of this and so far said company have aluded in a previous court hearing that they know i want it but won't comply - the judge has said basically wait til your full hearing and then raise it then with the fact they have failed to comply to my request. I have 2 written proofs of this and 1 recorded phone conversation with the 'middle man' confirming that commisions are paid but could not disclose amounts as they said this was an arrangement between the 2 companies.

 

We are at the stage of having to send each other the docs we intend to use - should I just pop them in their - I believe I do not have to explain their presence

Link to post
Share on other sites

nope - one woman on her crusade after being called a stupid little girl!!

 

This started as a general PPI reclaim but seems to have snowballed as I have found a number of 'issues' I feel need to be dealt with in the best interests of all concerned ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I am the CLAIMANT in an action to recover mis-sold PPI I am trying to get my hands on documents that I would normally get under a SAR - bascially everything they have on me.

 

However the company involved is not really playing ball and to be honest is flat out ignoring me - they are not cashing the postal orders and are claiming to not be receiving the SAR (i have sent 2 now) or reminders despite them being signed for.

 

Now I believe (correct me if I'm wrong) that I can get all of this under CPR however the template letter I can find is one as if I am the defendant.

 

Does anyone have a claimants version??

 

Thanks all

Link to post
Share on other sites

you can change the template to say you are a calimant, under the rules any information which can he helpful to your claim they have to disclose.

 

 

 

 

 

I am not a legal expert I might have made mistakes in what i have written. If you have found any mistakes please feel free to point them out. Anything posted on this forum is for discussion purposes only. It should not be considered as legal advice. Different people have different needs and what is right for one person may be different for another. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an legal expert who can advise you after finding out more about your situation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...