Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good afternoon, I am writing because I am very frustrated. I received a parking fine from MET Parking Services Ltd , ( Southgate park Stansted CM24 1PY) . We stopped for a quick meal in Mcdonalds and were there fir around 30 mins. We always do this after flights and never received a parking fine before.  Reason: The vehicle left in Southgate car park without payment made for parking and the occupants southgate premises. they took some pictures of us leaving the car. i did not try and appeal it yet as I came across many forums that this is a scam and I should leave it. But I keep getting threatening letters.  Incident happened : 23/10/2023 I did contact Mcdonalds and they said this:  Joylyn (McDonald’s Customer Services) 5 Apr 2024, 12:05 BST Dear Laura, Thank you for contacting McDonald’s Customer Services. I’m sorry to hear that you have received a Parking Charge Notice following your visit to our Stansted restaurant.   We've introduced parking restrictions at some of our restaurants to make sure there are always parking spaces available for customers.   We appreciate that some visits such as birthday parties or large group visits might take longer and the parking restrictions aren't intended to stop this. If you think your stay will exceed the stated maximum parking time then please speak to a manager in advance.   Your number plate is scanned by our Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) system when you enter our car park, and then again when you leave. If you have overstayed the maximum time allowed, you will not be notified straight away- a Parking Charge Notice will be sent to you via the post.   If you feel that a Parking Charge Notice has been issued in error, please contact our approved contractors who issued the charge in order to appeal the charge. Unfortunately McDonald's are unable to revoke parking tickets- the outcome of the appeal is final and cannot be overturned by McDonald’s.   Many thanks for taking the time to contact McDonald’s Customer Services.   Can someone please help me out and suggest what I should do next?  Thank you 
    • Good Evening, I've got a fairly simple question but I'll provide some context incase needed. I've pursued a company that has operations in england despite them having no official office anywhere. I've managed to find a site they operate from and the papers there have been defended so I know they operate there. They've filed a defence which is honestly the worst defence ever, and despite being required to provide their witness evidence, they have not and have completely ignored the courts and my request for copies of it. I'm therefore considering applying to strike out their defence on the grounds the defence was rubbish and that they haven't provided any evidence for the trial. However, it has a trial date set for end of june, and a civil application wouldn't get heard until a week before then, so hardly worth it. However, my local court is very good at dealing with paper applications (i.e ones that don't need hearings, and frankly I think they are literally like 1-2 days from when you submit it to when a Judge sees it. I'm wondering if I can apply to strikeout a defence without a hearing OR whether a hearing is required for a strikeout application.   Thanks
    • I have just opened another bank acc with lloyds (i have a few already) After doing some research they may have some relation to tsb or be apart of the same group will this cause me issue if my salary is paid into my lloyds account? Also, if the debts do go into default and nothing is paid then after 6 years it all goes away? As the DCAs cannot do anything? I do want to start paying in like 3/4 months or do you advise I leave it if it goes into default? again sorry for all the questions, i am just processing everything
    • one reply only  follow post 2 of letter of claim <<clickme link. dx
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Can my employer force overtime on to me?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5554 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have worked for a company for 2 1/2 years , 1 year agency then the rest on the books. I have been refusing overtime from the floor manager for a while now and I have been given a letter regarding a meeting I need to attend next Monday with the Production Manager. The meeting is supposed to be regarding my "poor" attendance. I was in a car accident Monday, so I had 3 days off work, got a sick note from my GP. Besides that I have had exactly 5 days off in 2 1/2 years, and this constitutes as "poor" attendance.

 

I feel this meeting will work its way around to being about overtime, which I really don't want to do. One of my fellow employees told me they are going to turn my current 8 1/2 hour shifts [44 hr wk] into 12 hour shifts [60 hr wk] and they are going to do this without any notice (they will want me to do it starting next Monday). I want to know what I can say because really I want to tell them to give me 44 hrs or fire me.

 

Also can I claim unfair dismissal if they do fire me for this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Most workers should not have to work more than an average of 48 hours a week, according to the Working Time Regulations. The Regulations also give you rights to paid holiday, rest breaks and limits on night work.

 

 

Your average working hours are calculated over a 17-week period. You can work more than 48 hours in one week as long as the average is less than 48.

 

If you are 18 or over and wish to work more than 48 hours a week, you can choose to opt out of the 48 hour limit. This must be voluntary and in writing. It can't be an agreement with the whole workforce and you shouldn't be sacked or subjected to a detriment (for example, refused promotion or overtime) for refusing to sign an opt-out.

If you sign an opt-out, you have the right to cancel this agreement at any time by giving between one week and three months' notice. You can agree this notice period with your employer when you sign the opt-out. You can cancel an opt-out even if it's part of a contract you've signed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the quick reply. I will need to cancel the opt-out because I do remember something about this when I signed the contract but dont remember the exact details (18 months ago). Its good to know I can cancel this. Also what do you think I can say on Monday when they say I need to do the over time?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The working time directive is a waste of space. It was introduced in 1998 yet millions of people still work more than 48 hours per week. The (UK) government is the only government in Europe which has allowed employers to take advantage of the "opt out" clause, effectively rendering the WTD useless in the UK. I know from bitter experience that some employers pressure employees to sign the opt out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the quick reply. I will need to cancel the opt-out because I do remember something about this when I signed the contract but dont remember the exact details (18 months ago). Its good to know I can cancel this. Also what do you think I can say on Monday when they say I need to do the over time?

 

You should have a copy of your terms & conditions, is overtime mentioned?

 

I once had a job where my T&C stated that a "reasonable" amount of overtime was expected! What was considered a reasonable amount was something of a grey area...

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is all academic as Europe has decided that the UK cannot opt out of the maximum working week and our wtd will be changed soon.

 

Don't hold your breath. The EU has said the UK should "phase out" the WTD "opt out" clause by 2012. What's the betting the government/CBI will get the "opt out" extended after that date...I'd put money on it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't hold your breath. The EU has said the UK should "phase out" the WTD "opt out" clause by 2012. What's the betting the government/CBI will get the "opt out" extended after that date...I'd put money on it.

 

I hope they do, I think we should have the opportunity to work as many hours as we want. A lot of people enjoy working overtime and many more rely on it to bring in extra money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thing ive noticed about european workers though is that they get paid more, and seem to get more holidays than we do here in the UK.

 

for example, my swedish friend (who has recently been made redundant from his job as a welder at the volvo factory) said to me when he visited that he gets 6 weeks anual leave per year, never works more than a 48 hour week (shift system - 12 hour shifts) and gets paid the equivalent of £35k per year (or £670 per week)....and he was just in a basic level job!.

 

i dunno what £35k is in swedish kroner, but compare that to another friend of mine who is a welder in this country.

 

he regularly does 60 hour weeks, gets a maximum of 2 weeks a year annual leave, and he only gets paid £7.50 p/h. (£450 per week, less tax and travelling costs, total maximum £23,400 PA)

 

the "opt out" sceme is ok in theory, as long as wages are increased to reflect the lost earnings, and bring us more into line with europe, which is a phrase which often gets touted but actually means very little)

Link to post
Share on other sites

thing ive noticed about european workers though is that they get paid more, and seem to get more holidays than we do here in the UK.

 

for example, my swedish friend (who has recently been made redundant from his job as a welder at the volvo factory) said to me when he visited that he gets 6 weeks anual leave per year, never works more than a 48 hour week (shift system - 12 hour shifts) and gets paid the equivalent of £35k per year (or £670 per week)....and he was just in a basic level job!.

 

i dunno what £35k is in swedish kroner, but compare that to another friend of mine who is a welder in this country.

 

he regularly does 60 hour weeks, gets a maximum of 2 weeks a year annual leave, and he only gets paid £7.50 p/h. (£450 per week, less tax and travelling costs, total maximum £23,400 PA)

 

the "opt out" sceme is ok in theory, as long as wages are increased to reflect the lost earnings, and bring us more into line with europe, which is a phrase which often gets touted but actually means very little)

 

But that's only one part of the equation isn't it? Depends on the cost of living in the country youre comparing the UK with. I haven't looked it up but I have it in my mind that Sweden is very expensive so, although the salary may sound high, it may need to be to allow for the cost of living.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well, from what i gather theres not much difference between there and here, moneywise anyways.

 

food costs are roughly the same, as is the cost of a car or a house. petrol is cheaper, as are taxes, but other misc stuff is about the same.

i know my friend was surprised at the cost of a hotel room and alcohol in this country, and was surprised to find out that you had to pay to get into museums and such.

 

his wage, (well, former wage anyways) is still over and above what he would get paid here for doing the same work, plus in addition to that theres the matter of 6 weeks annual paid leave, apparently everybody gets that, some even get more!, and its pretty much the same kind of deal in other countries like france, germany, denmark, norway, italy etc.

 

although that said, my friend is having to consider moving to norway to look for work, as sweden is currently facing a bit of a nasty unemployment crisis, but its not half as bad there as it is here, and, to boot, the swedish government actually give people money towards relocation in order to keep them in work!.

 

Britain is behind the times in regards to its integration with europe, we need to either do like what the rest of the EU do, or withdraw from it, we cant carry on doing this "half and half" crap.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As interesting as all this EU V UK talk is, I need to ask something again about my original post.

 

If I refuse overtime (which I have no prior notice for) and they fire me, does it count as unfair dismissal?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you be forced to work overtime, or stopped from doing so?

 

Your contract of employment should include the conditions for working overtime. You only have to work overtime if your contract says so. Even if it does you can't usually be forced to work more than an average of 48 hours per week. If you're told to work more than this and you don't want to, you should first take it up with your employer.

 

Your contract of employment should say what your normal working hours and days are, and this may include or exclude working on Sundays. Whether this counts as overtime working depends on your contract of employment. Workers in betting premises and in retail shops can choose to opt out of working on a Sunday.

Please note that although my advice is offered, you should consult your legal representative before taking ANY action.

 

 

have a nice day !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope they do, I think we should have the opportunity to work as many hours as we want. A lot of people enjoy working overtime and many more rely on it to bring in extra money.

 

Employees who wish to work more than 48 hours per week should imo be allowed to do so if it is their choice, but how do we protect against bad employers who force/pressure employees to work long hours against their will?

 

48 hours is not just a number eurocrats have pulled out of a hat, research has shown that people who work more than 48 hours per week are more likely to suffer from stress, heart related ill health and divorce.

 

I would question your assertion that "a lot of people enjoy working overtime" I would have thought overtime was worked through necessity rather than enjoyment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would question your assertion that "a lot of people enjoy working overtime" I would have thought overtime was worked through necessity rather than enjoyment.

 

I quite enjoy doing overtime, the money obviously comes in handy, but I am one of the rare people who enjoys their job, I have just put in to do an extra 18 hours next week just for the fun of it. My MIL is always at work, I don't know if it is because she loves her job or because it keeps her away from my FIL :lol:

 

In reply to the OP, like other people have advised, have a look at your contract and see what it says about overtime, this will be vital in your argument. Also a lot of firms have 'back to work interviews', it is to check that you are OK and that you don't need anything extra to help you with your work, good luck.

Edited by 389shell
Added info

PLEASE DONATE ANYTHING THAT YOU CAN

 

 

A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul.

George Bernard Shaw

 

 

 

 

Go on, click me scales (if I have helped) :grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I made a mistake in the first post, I work 42 1/2 hrs a week... 2 1/2 get deducted for breaks (believe me its not a great job). I think I should offer up to 48hrs, because from what I am reading here, I need to give at least this, otherwise it would not count as unfair dismissal. If they still say 48hr is not good enough then I will tell them thats all I can do it. I wont walk out because obviously walking out is not being sacked... so I cant claim, nor could I claim the dole for 6 weeks if I walk out.

 

Does the overtime include breaks? If it doesnt then it practically means I have to do 2 shifts of 12hrs a week, 1 shift of... maybe 10 hrs, plus 2 regular 8 1/2 hr shifts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If there is no mention in your contract about compulsory overtime, then you don't have to do ANY.

 

Breaks are not included.

PLEASE DONATE ANYTHING THAT YOU CAN

 

 

A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul.

George Bernard Shaw

 

 

 

 

Go on, click me scales (if I have helped) :grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...