Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I hope Lord Frost is OK. Islamists and the woke Left are uniting to topple the West ARCHIVE.PH archived 18 Apr 2024 19:12:37 UTC  
    • Ok you are in the clear. The PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 for two reasons. The first is that in Section 9 [2][e]  says the PCN must "state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper— (i)to pay the unpaid parking charges ". It does not say that even though it continues correctly with blurb about the driver. The other fault is that there is no parking period mentioned. Their ANPR cameras do show your arrival and departure times but as that at the very least includes driving from the entrance to the parking space then later leaving the parking space and driving to the exit. It also doesn't allow for finding a parking spot: manoeuvering into it avoiding parking on the lines: possibly having to stop to allow pedestrians/other cars to pass in front of you; returning the trolley after finishing shopping; loading children disabled people in and out of the car, etc etc.  All of that could easily add five, ten or even 15 minutes to your time which the ANPR cameras cannot take into account. So even if it was only two hours free time you could  still have been within the  time since there is a MINIMUM of 15 minutes Grace period when you leave the car park. However as they cannot even manage to get their PCN to comply with the Act you as keeper cannot be pursued. Only the driver is now liable and they do not know who was driving as you have not appealed and perhaps unwittingly given away who was driving. So you do not owe them a penny. No need to appeal. Let them waste their money pursuing you . 
    • If Labour are elected I hope they go after everyone who made huge amounts of money out of this, by loading the company with debt. The sad thing is that some pension schemes, including the universities one, USS, will lose money along with customers.
    • What's the reason for not wanting a smart meter? Personally I'm saving a pile on a tariff only available with one. Today electricity is 17.17p/kWh. If the meter is truly past its certification date the supplier is obliged to replace it. If you refuse to allow this then eventually they'll get warrant and do so by force. Certified life varies between models and generations, some only 10 or 15 years, some older types as long as 40 years or maybe even more. Your meter should have its certified start date marked somewhere so if you doubt the supplier you can look up the certified life and cross check.
    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

vodafone massive stitch up...


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5547 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

right. last year i ordered a sim card from vodafone, one of the no contract, pay £19.99 a month ones they were doing, which had to be paid for with a debit card so my mum lent me hers. i waited for ages and it never arrived, so i emailed them and they informed me that it had been returned to them undelivered and if i wished to take it up again i would have to re-order it. it took me ages to get any contact with them and as id become disheartened i sent them a mail to say that as i had been messed around i wouldnt be interested and asked what would happen to the details they had to which they never responded.

 

forward three months after that and they sent my mum a bill for a months use. i called them and never got anywhere, with them being very rude to me telling me that basically even thought they had record that i never recieved a sim, they were still going to charge for it. i told them it was ridiculous and they basically fobbed me off after a bit of an aggro match saying they would look into it. the following month we got another bill and it carried on with me calling, getting no answers and them being rude. they said i couldnt talk to anyone, and that i would have to get in touch with someone by mail to cancel the contract and still pay the money owed, which at this point was about £60. then last month they got a soliciter company onto my mum, and they are sending her threats, and call me constantly all day from 8am to 11pm, if i answer it is an automated service. i dont know what to do, i really cant see how they can collect money for something they clearly accept never got despatched, i still have the emails saying they had recieved it back. what can i so about it? my mother has stopped talking to me over this because she is so angry about it and vodafone are just horribly rude and unhelpful. i am totally stuck. any help would be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to put something in writing.

Personally,I would be asking for the £19.99 back,since they did not provide it.

In the absence of any proof,you will struggle to get a result,so a carefully worded letter inviting their response may get what you need.

If you are disputing this,then under OFT guidelines,and other protections,then they should stay further attempts to recover monies from you.

I suggest that you put something in writing,and address it to Vodafone legal affairs.

It depends if you are prepared to see it through.

It may mean you submitting a SAR to get the information.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes Henry thats good evidence-they COULD challenge it as inadmissible for third party use if it states in the headers that its legally priviledged.

But I would put something in writing as I said,making reference to their own acknowledgement.

Give them 14 days to respond positively,and also give you an undertaking that whilst the dispute remains,they will suspend any further recovery or collection activities by them or third parties.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This was all done by post... yes?

 

You have them by the short and curlies. The Distance Selling Regulations protect you and as they didn't deliver (for whatever reason) your gambit is now you DEMAND your £19.99 back within 28 days.

 

If you don't receive this, you will raise a Small Claim action for this amount without further notice. Ignore threats from the Debt Collectors, you deal ONLY with Vodafone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

within 28 days though...... i ordered and was informed about the non delivery and re-order status in august, after i'd ordered in june, this is the mail they sent me. the order was made online. i then mailed back "patrice" to say i wouldnt be ordering again and i didnt understand how i would order again as they had my details but they never got back to me. they then waited until october to send the first bill through for the month of septmeber, which surely if they believed they were in rights to bill me it would have started in june or july from when i first ordered it?

 

 

Hi Claire

I've tried to contact you today and I'm sorry we didn't get the chance to speak.

I've spoken to our online team and they've advised me that the order was sent out on the 33/07/08 adn this was returned to us after a failed delivery.

What you will need to do is reorder this item by phone or online again.

I do apologise for any inconvenience caused.

If I can help in any other way Claire, please let me know.

 

 

Kind Regards,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Patrice Henshaw

 

p.s im guessing the date 33/07/08 is a stupid typo.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Without you activating the SIM, they have not established the contract and you're not due them anything. Have they actually taken any money from you? If they have, you need to get this back, but I'd suggest getting an ASDA SIM, it uses the Vodafone network, but the customer service centre (in Scotland!) is much better!

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep they have taken money, and then carried on after i had to cancel the direct debit because the customer services wouldnt help me which is why they have now passed it onto a collection agent. there was never any activation, no phone number, and the bills they have sent show no usage. and they still also left nearly a three month gap before they started billing for it.

 

i still dont really know what the best thing to send them is. ive had about 6 calls from the dca today already.

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tell the DCA should they call again, to cease. You never recieved a working SIM from their client, and no contract exists. You ask Vodafone for all your money back, and give tem 28 days to provide it, and remove any adverse data lodged with their CRA. If they don't comply, you'll take THEM to the Small Claims court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...