Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • They have defended the claim by saying that the job was of unsatisfactory standard and they had to call another carpenter to remedy. My husband has text messages about them losing the keys a second time and also an email. What do they hope to achieve??? Most importantly,  as far as I have seen online, now I need to wait for paperwork from the court, correct?
    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
    • Here are 7 of our top tips to help you connect with young people who have left school or otherwise disengaged.View the full article
    • My defence was standard no paperwork:   1.The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2. Paragraph 1 is noted. The Defendant has had a contractual relationship with MBNA Limited in the past. The Defendant does not recognise the reference number provided by the claimant within its particulars and has sought verification from the claimant who is yet to comply with requests for further information. 3. Paragraph 2 is denied. The Defendant maintains that a default notice was never received. The Claimant is put to strict proof to that a default notice was issued by MBNA Limited and received by the Defendant. 4. Paragraph 3 is denied. The Defendant is unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served from either the Claimant or MBNA Limited. 5. On the 02/01/2023 the Defendant requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CCA 1974 Section 78 request. The claimant is yet to respond to this request. On the 19/05/2023 a CPR 31.14 request was sent to Kearns who is yet to respond. To date, 02/06/2023, no documentation has been received. The claimant remains in default of my section 78 request. 6. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of proof of assignment being sent/ agreement/ balance/ breach or termination requested by CPR 31.14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) show how the Defendant entered into an agreement; and (b) show and evidence the nature of breach and service of a default notice pursuant to Section 87(1) CCA1974 (c) show how the claimant has reached the amount claimed for; and (d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim; 7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 8. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974. 9. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

unrealistic rent increase is this legal


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5560 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi guys

 

hope someone can advise me on the following

 

im renting a property that was originally on the market at £1100 PCM,through haggeling with the property owner i got the rent reduced to £960 PCM on a 6 month agreement which finishes at the end of FEB 09

 

 

The landlord has told me he is going to increase the rent to £1120 pcm, i've told him to shove his rent increase where the sun dont shine...

 

 

The property is nice but only worth approx £850 ish compaired to other similar houses...........

 

The landlord has only given me 1 months notice, which i think is too short a notice..............

 

 

I did tell him when we moved in i was looking for 12-18 month stay,which he assured me would be fine.....

 

He has just built another house and is going to rent that out and has had that valued at £800pcm (my prop is same but with 2 extra bedrooms in the loft)

 

 

The agent told him he could get upto £1200PCM for this property hence him trying to increase my rent... (nob)

 

Ive always had a good relationship with him until this episode last week...

 

We are going to rent somewhere else but 4 weeks is very short notice....

 

 

Why are some landlords absolute nobs with no business brains whatsoever....

 

 

Ive been told that he should give me 2 months notice can anyone confirm this please

 

 

thanks for any replies

 

Scott & Family

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is an assured shorthold tenancy. If, at the end of the 6 months (or whatever term is on your agreement ) you don't leave, then the landord has to take legal action.

 

Now, a clever landlord would have served you with a Section 21 Notice of Seeking Possession 8 weeks prior to the date the tenancy ends (if he wanted you to leave and knew he was going to ask you to leave). Have you received such a document from him? If so, check the dates. He has to give you a clear 8 weeks notice. (or 2 months).

 

It sounds to me that the landord was hoping you would stay and pay the higher rent, therefore may not have served you with this document. If so, that's his problem! He must now give you 8 weeks notice, andif you don;t leave he has to apply to the court for possession. (This will cost YOU £150) He will be granted this, it is his right. You can ask the court for up to 42 days extra for hardship cases. If you don't' leave by the date the court states you must the landlord must get the bailiff's in. (Again this will cost YOU £95)

 

So, when you see him say when are you going to serve me my S21 NOSP? You really do not have to budge until the steps described above have happened - gives you plenty of time to find somewhere better to rent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm also on 6-monthly assured Shorthold Tenancy but also on Income Support/Housing Benefit at the moment. In September 2008, our local council switched their system to new rental levels called LHA (Local Housing Assessment). Our rent benefit due went up to way over what the actual rent was!!!

 

Now we have a renewal letter for April (yes, it must be 2 months to give notice of moving out or rent increase!) but our rent will go up 7% to just under the LHA level:eek:

 

Word is that private landlords have had a whisp of these new levels.....:cool:

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

This is an assured shorthold tenancy. If, at the end of the 6 months (or whatever term is on your agreement ) you don't leave, then the landord has to take legal action.

 

Now, a clever landlord would have served you with a Section 21 Notice of Seeking Possession 8 weeks prior to the date the tenancy ends (if he wanted you to leave and knew he was going to ask you to leave). Have you received such a document from him? If so, check the dates. He has to give you a clear 8 weeks notice. (or 2 months).no documents served on us

 

It sounds to me that the landord was hoping you would stay and pay the higher rent, therefore may not have served you with this document. If so, that's his problem! ( He is struggling to pay the mortgage i did some work for him and his cheque bounced £3200.00 he has now paid me in full) He must now give you 8 weeks notice, andif you don;t leave he has to apply to the court for possession. (This will cost YOU £150) He will be granted this, it is his right. You can ask the court for up to 42 days extra for hardship cases. If you don't' leave by the date the court states you must the landlord must get the bailiff's in. (Again this will cost YOU £95)

 

So, when you see him say when are you going to serve me my S21 NOSP? You really do not have to budge until the steps described above have happened - gives you plenty of time to find somewhere better to rent.

 

He knows i can afford the rent increase,so i think HE IS TRYING IT ON...

 

thanks for your help

 

Scott

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm also on 6-monthly assured Shorthold Tenancy but also on Income Support/Housing Benefit at the moment. In September 2008, our local council switched their system to new rental levels called LHA (Local Housing Assessment). Our rent benefit due went up to way over what the actual rent was!!!

 

Now we have a renewal letter for April (yes, it must be 2 months to give notice of moving out or rent increase!) but our rent will go up 7% to just under the LHA level:eek:

 

Word is that private landlords have had a whisp of these new levels.....:cool:

 

Hi

 

Thanks for your comments

 

My rent is well above the LHA and im not claiming any benefits..

 

thanks for confirming 2 months notice

 

Scott

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is an assured shorthold tenancy. If, at the end of the 6 months (or whatever term is on your agreement ) you don't leave, then the landord has to take legal action.

 

Now, a clever landlord would have served you with a Section 21 Notice of Seeking Possession 8 weeks prior to the date the tenancy ends (if he wanted you to leave and knew he was going to ask you to leave). Have you received such a document from him? If so, check the dates. He has to give you a clear 8 weeks notice. (or 2 months).

 

It sounds to me that the landord was hoping you would stay and pay the higher rent, therefore may not have served you with this document. If so, that's his problem! He must now give you 8 weeks notice, andif you don;t leave he has to apply to the court for possession. (This will cost YOU £150) He will be granted this, it is his right. You can ask the court for up to 42 days extra for hardship cases. If you don't' leave by the date the court states you must the landlord must get the bailiff's in. (Again this will cost YOU £95)

 

So, when you see him say when are you going to serve me my S21 NOSP? You really do not have to budge until the steps described above have happened - gives you plenty of time to find somewhere better to rent.

 

Dont thank this poster to much as whats written here is mostly nonsense.

 

You managed to haggle down the rent by £140 pcm for the first six months, so to be honest I am not surprised that your LL now wants to increase it to the level it was originally marketed at. Have you done a quick search of similar properties in the area? - what are the rents like? - can you use these to negotiate with your LL?

 

Check your tenancy agreement, there maybe a rent increase mechanism built into it? - if not then your landlord can serve you a s.13 notice of a rent increase. This will take effect after one full calander month on the next rent due date. Have you been served one of these? If not and there is no rental increase mechanism in your AST, then your LL cannot increasse your rent until the s.13 has been served, at which point you will have the option of having the new proposed rent considered by a rent assessment committee, agreeing to it, or moving out after giving the correct notice.

 

In terms of the s.21 notice, if you dont agree to the increase, rather than goingthrough the s.13 stuff, then your LL may simply serve you one of these given you two full months calander notice to leave the property.

 

So, to answer your original question;

 

- If he want you to leave - its two months notice;

- If he wants to increase your rent - its 1 months s.13 notice.

Edited by Planner
Link to post
Share on other sites

Bt the way, the LHA allowance figure for housing benefit is always set at the median rent for that type of property in the area, so it's not surprising some people's rents are higher and some lower.

Post by me are intended as a discussion of the issues involved, as these are of general interest to me and others on the forum. Although it is hoped such discussion will be of use to readers, before exposing yourself to risk of loss you should not rely on any principles discussed without confirming the situation with a qualified person.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As Planner says. If he has only "told" you, rather than send a Section 13 notice, then you can simply ignore.

 

I helped my neighbour do this. Basically, she wrote to him about 2 days before the end of the month giving her reasons for not accepting the rise and asking for any request to be sent "in the correct form". This would have meant the landlord would not have had time to serve either a section 13 notice or a section 21 thus buying an extra month.

 

In my neighbour's case, nothing more was heard (the landlord has apparently backed down).

 

PS. as in your case, my neighbour's landlord and his agent were both saying the property was worth more, but after a bit of investigation it turned out that some agents were accepting 100-150pcm *less* for the same type of house. So definitely worth shopping around.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All, I was just thinking if it is a 6 month tenancy that ends end of Febv does the LL have to give notice at all, or is it just the tenant that can hand the keys back at the end of the tenanacy without any communication. Sounds like a stupid question, i know, but....... xx

Please note, my advice is only my opinion.

If you have found my advice helpful, please tip my scales, thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All, I was just thinking if it is a 6 month tenancy that ends end of Febv does the LL have to give notice at all, or is it just the tenant that can hand the keys back at the end of the tenanacy without any communication. Sounds like a stupid question, i know, but....... xx

 

No notice required for tenant to end fix term at its end.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...