Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Although, any individual in a similar position should decide for themselves what they think is an appropriate course of action. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help with Rockwell/Lewis Group/Argos Card


davebham1982
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5454 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

This is my first post on here.

 

A while back I was made redundant while I had an outstanding debt on an Argos Card. I was aware that in the event of losing your job the best thing to do is to tell the company you owe money to and to come to an agreement. I told the argos lot this and i've been paying £10 per month. However i've recieved a letter from Rockwell saying that that my agreement with them has expired and to avoid them taking action please call their pre-legal dept.

 

So I cancelled the direct debit that came out monthly and endeavoured to find the money they requested paid in full.

 

However today I noticed a new direct debit on the 29th of January for £11.86 to The Lewis Group that I had no knowledge of. I've called up my bank and they said if I owe the company and I have an agreement then they are entitled to do that.

 

Can anyone help me with what to do next as I dont trust these people as far as I could throw them.

 

Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send off letter 'N' from here - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/20758-creditors-dcas-letter-templates.html

 

You need to send this to whoever owns the debt, send it with a £1 postal order and send recorded, if they don't send this within 12+2 working days then they are in default of your request and cannot enforce the debt (although some will try !!)....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ask to speak to a superviser, whoever told you such rot is speaking out of their derriere. DDs can be cancelled at anytime. Tell them you do not have an agreement and that you have not authorised the mandate and that any 'charges' incurred because of this unauthorised & illegal DD will be the banks responsibility not yours. Then ask him for a copy of their complaints procedure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorted out the Direct Debit.

 

And I am sending out a letter n from the templates tomorrow morning by recorded delivery with a postal order.

 

However I was just wondering what do I do next?

 

What happens if they dont reply in 12+2 days? Also is that business days or normal days? As the credit companys seem to count weekends when they want something.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's straight days, they have two working weeks + one weekend which = the 12 days. The + 2 days is just extra time that you have allowed if a second weekend falls into the time frame.

 

If they fail to supply The CCA in this time limit you can send the 'In Dispute' letter & you will be legally entitled to withold any payment until they comply to your request.

 

BTW, did you have any difficulty with the DD the second time?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No there wasnt a problem with the DD.

 

So basically they either comply in the time limit and I get a statement of whats gone on with the account and then I can talk about an arrangement/settling the account or they dont send me the proof and what next?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is rare for that to happen, but if it does payment would be due from that date. But they wouldn't be permitted to add interest or charges for the intervening time period.

 

Also if six years elapses between the last payment & them miraculously finding it, it would be statute barred.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I've recieved a letter last friday saying that they couldnt locate the documents and returned my postal order and saying they have closed their file.

 

I've sent the same letter off for my brother as he had two similar letters and he's recieved one asking for comfimation of address on one account and offering 50 and 25 off on the others if settled right away.

 

Any advice?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they are offering a discount like that the chances are they don't have a CCA for those accounts either.

 

How can they ask for confirmation of an address they've already written to, or was he living elsewhere when he had that account? If it was a different address all he has to do is say what that address was.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Some more advice needed plz.

 

As I said earlier in the thread I recieved a letter from Rockwell debt collection agency saying that they couldnt provide the documents requested in the letter and that my file has been closed and returned the £1.00 postal order which was sent on the 9th of February.

 

Today I recieved a letter from another company called Moorcroft Debt Recovery Limited after the same debt.

 

What should I do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send Moorcroft this with a copy of the letter from Rockwell;

 

ACCOUNT IN DISPUTE

 

Your Reference:

Client reference:

 

 

Dear Sir or Madam,

 

I must admit that I am rather bemused as to why this account has been passed to you, as it is in dispute with ***DCA*** and has been since ***Date***

Not only is this a breach of OFT collection guidelines, but also in breach of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and Data Protection Act 1998

 

 

As ***DCA*** is now in default of my Consumer Credit Act request, Office of Fair Trading Collection Guidelines and s10 Data Protection Act request, I consider this account to be in SERIOUS DISPUTE.

 

As you are aware while my Consumer Credit Act request remains in default, enforcement action is NOT permitted; under s127 this constitutes a complete defence at law. Consequentially any legal action you pursue will be averred as both UNLAWFUL and VEXATIOUS.

 

Now I would respectfully suggest that this account is returned to ***DCA*** for resolution of these defaults and breaches, as ***DCA*** cannot lawfully pursue any enforcement activities.

 

If ***DCA***chooses to ignore my dispute and attempt enforcement, I will initiate legal action and file reports with the appropriate authorities, including, but not limited to, Trading Standards, Office of Fair Trading, Information Commissioners Office, Financial Ombudsman Service and possible court action.

 

I hope that this will not be necessary and an acceptable solution can be accomplished.

 

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

 

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Quick update.

 

I've heard nothing back from Moorcroft or Rockwell and its been ages what do I do now?

 

Also the advice for my brother seemed to work apart from that Aktiv Kapital have instructed a Solicitiors called Buchanan Clark and Wells to write to him. He's going to scan the letter and send it to me but he's a bit busy looking after his 3 year old and his pregnant wife whos due in a month. However theres been no copy of the credit agreement or anything like that.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...