Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Could you post up what they've sent please so we can see what the charge is? Cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CCA unenforceable - what's the end result??


charliebubs
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5489 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'm just starting looking into my CCA agreements to see if they are enforceable or not.

 

However, I just wanted some clarification as to the actual end result if I find them unenforceable.

 

I understood initially that I could request that the debt be written off in its entirety. Is this right??

 

I have also heard that the loan company/credit card may refund you all the monies you have paid to them over the years in the mistaken belief that there was an enforceable agreement, and that with this money you have to clear the balance of the debt with them?!

 

Is it also right that you can claim back interest paid under these unenforceable agreements??

 

Any of the above would be good :) but I want to be clear on what the law says in these instances. :rolleyes:

 

Or is it up to each individial lender to deal with the debt as they see fit??

 

Many thanks guys :razz:

Claimed bank charges back from First Direct - 2007

Claim pending for bank charges with Alliance & Leicester - 2008

Looking into enforceability of CCA's with MBNA (x2) and Next Directory - 2009

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would see what your Consumer Credit Agreement requests bring before seeing what the end result may be.

 

May I suggest you read this thread about CCA's -

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/162851-consumer-credit-agreements.html

 

 

and also the various **won** threads to see what happens.

 

All cases are different and there is no "One size fits all" description that covers your question.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks SS - I have already read and posted on that thread.

 

I'm not meaning to jump the gun to the end result! I just wondered if there was a statutory resolution, or if it is a case of the banks deciding on a case-by-case basis.

 

;)

Claimed bank charges back from First Direct - 2007

Claim pending for bank charges with Alliance & Leicester - 2008

Looking into enforceability of CCA's with MBNA (x2) and Next Directory - 2009

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
I'm just starting looking into my CCA agreements to see if they are enforceable or not.

 

However, I just wanted some clarification as to the actual end result if I find them unenforceable.

 

I understood initially that I could request that the debt be written off in its entirety. Is this right??

You can ask them nicely to discharge your liability but it ain't going to happen I'm afraid.

 

I have also heard that the loan company/credit card may refund you all the monies you have paid to them over the years in the mistaken belief that there was an enforceable agreement, and that with this money you have to clear the balance of the debt with them?!

They can refund it to the card generally (see my CAP1 thread) but that just clears the debt. Which is good but doesn't put any money in your pocket. Be aware, the will NOT do this voluntarily - they have to be forced through Court action. Assuming you have a strong case.

Is it also right that you can claim back interest paid under these unenforceable agreements??

Can but try. Means if they lose they lose bigger and that gives them something to think about.

 

Any of the above would be good :) but I want to be clear on what the law says in these instances. :rolleyes:

 

Or is it up to each individial lender to deal with the debt as they see fit??

All you need to know is each lender has their own level of aggressiveness. That's it.

 

Many thanks guys :razz:

Remember even unenforceable accounts can be sold on to stupid DCAs who don't know any better for a small profit. The rest written off for TAX purposes.

 

Depends on what you want to achieve. Many are ok with a stalemate. Myself, i want total satisfaction knowing the debt is either written off (legally and formally in writing) or paid off in F&F settlement. No comeback in a few yrs saying you owe this or that.

:!: -Any advise I give is based purely on my own experience. It should not be solely relied upon as I am NOT a legal expert and any major decisions you make should not be based on my opinion alone -

HFC Bank - Davey vs HFC

Barclays - Monthly payments made

Cahoot - Agreement received, awaiting 2nd agreement after DCA.

MBNA1&2 - Agreements received. (Currently in limbo)

Halifax - Davey vs Halifax/Cabot

MINT - Davey vs Mint

Amex - Davey vs Amex

Cap1 **WON** £1,500 Written Off Davey vs Cap1

 

Never Sign Anything

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good points raised Charliebubs!! I have been wondering the same things!!

 

Also, once a CCA is found to be unenforceable, is there a letter that should be sent to the bank or DCA, or is it just a case of once you know that its unenforceable, sitting back and waiting for them to contact you?

consumeractiongroup.co.uk

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are lots of different methods depending on how urgent the matter is to you and what your personal situation is.

I prefer to keep the paper trail going showing you have asked many times for (whatever you require) a properly executed agreement etc etc

 

This thread on the CPR is another method to try to get other documents out of the creditor:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/173201-why-you-shouldnt-use.html

:!: -Any advise I give is based purely on my own experience. It should not be solely relied upon as I am NOT a legal expert and any major decisions you make should not be based on my opinion alone -

HFC Bank - Davey vs HFC

Barclays - Monthly payments made

Cahoot - Agreement received, awaiting 2nd agreement after DCA.

MBNA1&2 - Agreements received. (Currently in limbo)

Halifax - Davey vs Halifax/Cabot

MINT - Davey vs Mint

Amex - Davey vs Amex

Cap1 **WON** £1,500 Written Off Davey vs Cap1

 

Never Sign Anything

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Davey - when I started this thread back in Jan I was a bit ignorant as to what would and could happen. Many hours of reading the boards since....I now have a much better idea.

 

Thanks for your response though :)

Claimed bank charges back from First Direct - 2007

Claim pending for bank charges with Alliance & Leicester - 2008

Looking into enforceability of CCA's with MBNA (x2) and Next Directory - 2009

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Quick update - I've had success with one of my catalogue companies!

 

Additions Direct - used to be Abound - admitted to not being able to find/not having a credit agreement for me. So I wrote back saying that the debt was unenforceable and that I wouldn't make any further payments. I have now received a letter from them confirming that they agree and that they will not be pursuing me!

 

Woohoo!!

 

It's my smallest debt at just over £700 - but every penny helps!! :)

 

Thanks so much to this forum.

Claimed bank charges back from First Direct - 2007

Claim pending for bank charges with Alliance & Leicester - 2008

Looking into enforceability of CCA's with MBNA (x2) and Next Directory - 2009

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice work Charlie B ;)

:!: -Any advise I give is based purely on my own experience. It should not be solely relied upon as I am NOT a legal expert and any major decisions you make should not be based on my opinion alone -

HFC Bank - Davey vs HFC

Barclays - Monthly payments made

Cahoot - Agreement received, awaiting 2nd agreement after DCA.

MBNA1&2 - Agreements received. (Currently in limbo)

Halifax - Davey vs Halifax/Cabot

MINT - Davey vs Mint

Amex - Davey vs Amex

Cap1 **WON** £1,500 Written Off Davey vs Cap1

 

Never Sign Anything

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...