Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

PPI - bank requesting employers benefits policy??????????


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5475 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am at the first stage of requesting ppi refund on loans and credit cards. I have had a response letter from the bank with the standard 8 week letter. However, the credit card response letter is also asking for a copy of my employers sickness benefit policy as this was one but not all of the reasons why i said i was missold. Are they within their rights to ask for this? the credit card agreements go back to 2001-3. I feel that i shouldnt have to provide it now, it should have been discussed at the time..Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

delaying tactics....

none of their business

so what are they going to do then even if you did have it?

turn around and say oh no this wasn't good enough ...thats why we charged you our ppi!

they didn't ask upon getting the card, so why ask now.

 

dx

  • Haha 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello wanda,

 

I am at the first stage of requesting ppi refund on loans and credit cards. I have had a response letter from the bank with the standard 8 week letter. However, the credit card response letter is also asking for a copy of my employers sickness benefit policy as this was one but not all of the reasons why i said i was missold. IMO they have no right to try and confirm you were already covered by your employer. They have to ensure the product they mis-sold was not mis-sold and your employers are arrangements are between you and your employer and have nothing to do with them. Are they within their rights to ask for this? No IMO they have no right to ask. The onus is on them to prove they have not mis-sold and not on you to prove you already had sufficient cover. the credit card agreements go back to 2001-3. I feel that i shouldnt have to provide it now, it should have been discussed at the time..Thanks

 

In line with the response to your post by dx, In the words of Blackadder

give them the reply as follows:

 

response is OFF SOD but not necessarily in that order:eek:

 

This is yet another ploy used to delay the claimant and the Information Commissioners Office and the Financial Services Authority and the Office of Fair Trading should be made aware of this by submission of a Very Serious complaint about their behaviour let the galaxy know what they are trying to do:D

 

aa

Edited by alanalana
change in text

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have now had the response back regarding the loan accounts of which there are 3. The complaint seems to have been split in two - credit card and loans. The response was as expectd - 1. asking for copy of employers benefits documents 2. asking for copies of agreements for 2 of the loans as they say they don't have, even tho they previously sent them to me in the SAR docs 3. Basically we don't mis-sell

 

Sent them back the 2nd letter today - asking for them to review and respond in 14 days or am going to FOS.

 

Has anyone else had recent successes with Lloyds, the only ones i can seem to find on this site are older successes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I have now had a reply from Lloyds TSB. I seem to have three advisors dealing with my claim

 

1. Dealing with loans - been fobbed off with usual lloyds responses detailed plenty of time on this site. Wrote back a month ago requesting reconsideration, and also highlighting my lack of pro-rata refund and asking for explanation. No response.

 

2. Credit card - not compulsory, you had policy booklet. Said it was not their responsibility to probe exisiting employer policies as their insurance would still be valid anyway

 

3. Credit card - can't respond yet - will respond soon.

 

Have now sent all three cases to the Financial ombundsman

 

Any further advice?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Had an unexpected success with Lloyds tsb. After writing to me about the loans and saying 'no' to my claim, someone else wrote to me in my maiden name, the original name on my accounts, and said they were upholding my claim and return premiums plus interest!

 

Had the first of the two refunds today. No interest though. When I rang they said the interest goes into your account seperately and can take upto 21 days.

 

Expecting a total of about £2.5k :)

 

FOS are still dealing with the credit card side of the claim so will have to wait and see what happens

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done :D keep at them.

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...