Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bookie and DLA... ***WON***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5241 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Go tell 'em how it is missus.

 

Everything's crossed for you and T.;)

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 93
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Well, so much for 1/2 hour hearing, I was there for over 2 hours!!! :shock:

 

And the result?............. Adjourned. I kid you not.

 

Apparently, the huge amount of case law, testimonies from school, family friends, people who do actually know my son and my own 6 pages statement comprehensively demolishing the DWP's case isn't enough if there isn't a Dr's report... :-|

 

Well, yeah. Apart from his autism, T. is actually very healthy and hasn't been seen by the GP for years. What am I supposed to do, take him there once a year so they can confirm he is still autistic? :rolleyes:

 

Anyway, I pointed out that a CAMHS appointment in our area would take between 18 and 24 mths, possibly longer, and that the Ed psych for the LEA wouldn't be interested in following him up since he is in private school, so what to do? Eventually settled on asking the Ed psych from the private school (who has after all known him for nigh on 4 yrs) for a report, meanwhile, I must still get the CAMHS referral in action, and I must keep a diary of his meltdowns to document the when, how, why etc... Of course, the problem is that we actually seldom take him out precisely because of the behaviours, so it seems we are going to have to take him out more often and distress him and us so that we can document his distress... Oh-hum.

 

The goods news is (yes, really!) that they didn't just toss the case out, which is I think what they intended to do in the first place, so here's hoping and waiting some more. :-( Who said it was ever easy, hey?

 

signed: an absolutely shattered Bookie who's going to go for a long nap before she falls asleep on the keyboard. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, so much for 1/2 hour hearing, I was there for over 2 hours!!! :shock:

 

And the result?............. Adjourned. I kid you not.

 

Apparently, the huge amount of case law, testimonies from school, family friends, people who do actually know my son and my own 6 pages statement comprehensively demolishing the DWP's case isn't enough if there isn't a Dr's report... :-|

 

Well, yeah. Apart from his autism, T. is actually very healthy and hasn't been seen by the GP for years. What am I supposed to do, take him there once a year so they can confirm he is still autistic? :rolleyes:

 

Anyway, I pointed out that a CAMHS appointment in our area would take between 18 and 24 mths, possibly longer, and that the Ed psych for the LEA wouldn't be interested in following him up since he is in private school, so what to do? Eventually settled on asking the Ed psych from the private school (who has after all known him for nigh on 4 yrs) for a report, meanwhile, I must still get the CAMHS referral in action, and I must keep a diary of his meltdowns to document the when, how, why etc... Of course, the problem is that we actually seldom take him out precisely because of the behaviours, so it seems we are going to have to take him out more often and distress him and us so that we can document his distress... Oh-hum.

 

The goods news is (yes, really!) that they didn't just toss the case out, which is I think what they intended to do in the first place, so here's hoping and waiting some more. :-( Who said it was ever easy, hey?

 

signed: an absolutely shattered Bookie who's going to go for a long nap before she falls asleep on the keyboard. :-)

 

You have my utmost and heartfelt sympathy.

 

I cannot get any help re: AS.

 

I get lower mobility and diasability premium for IS for my agoraphobia.

 

NOTHING for AS, severe PTSD, severe IBS, arthritis, OCD, dyspraxia and dyslexia and a million and one other things :|

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well at least you're still in there fighting and they're still listening. A positive result would have been better but this is the the next best thing IMHO.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, so much for 1/2 hour hearing, I was there for over 2 hours!!! :shock:

 

And the result?............. Adjourned. I kid you not.

 

Apparently, the huge amount of case law, testimonies from school, family friends, people who do actually know my son and my own 6 pages statement comprehensively demolishing the DWP's case isn't enough if there isn't a Dr's report... :-|

 

Well, yeah. Apart from his autism, T. is actually very healthy and hasn't been seen by the GP for years. What am I supposed to do, take him there once a year so they can confirm he is still autistic? :rolleyes:

 

Anyway, I pointed out that a CAMHS appointment in our area would take between 18 and 24 mths, possibly longer, and that the Ed psych for the LEA wouldn't be interested in following him up since he is in private school, so what to do? Eventually settled on asking the Ed psych from the private school (who has after all known him for nigh on 4 yrs) for a report, meanwhile, I must still get the CAMHS referral in action, and I must keep a diary of his meltdowns to document the when, how, why etc... Of course, the problem is that we actually seldom take him out precisely because of the behaviours, so it seems we are going to have to take him out more often and distress him and us so that we can document his distress... Oh-hum.

 

The goods news is (yes, really!) that they didn't just toss the case out, which is I think what they intended to do in the first place, so here's hoping and waiting some more. :-( Who said it was ever easy, hey?

 

signed: an absolutely shattered Bookie who's going to go for a long nap before she falls asleep on the keyboard. :-)

 

oh bookie,

sorry this isnt sorted yet,

what on earth are they playing at ?:mad:

it makes me so mad that people have to go through all this and yet there are people out there that think these benefits are just handed to you and all you have to do is apply for these things and you get them

it makes my blood boil

keep on fighting them and keep strong

skeg xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Time for an update.

 

Got a date for tribunal on December 3rd.

 

I kept a diary as requested and am about to send that in to add to the file. I have received a copy of T's medical records which, as expected, show nothing very useful, and just show that once we had him in a SEN school, they were quite happy to discharge him. Also received copy of the MDT at his school, suitably bland and neutral the way those reports usually are. My job will be to show the tribunal what lies between the cracks, the traffic light system put in place for example to deal with his behaviours, which shows the excesses for what they are and how difficult it is for the school to cope as well.

 

One thing the diary shows is how unpredictable his behaviour is, and how there is no pattern to when he goes in meltdown, and how neither the school nor us can see it coming at times. I hope that will help giving the tribunal a true picture. We will see.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OMG, this has been going on forever Bookie, I've just received Sams new DLA pack, I hope i dont have the sane carry on as last time but no doubt another fight on my hands is looming...if its not to get him the care he needs in school, its the financial benefit he's entitled to, to help with his care, they try to take it all away, in one way or another:confused: Gc...Good luck with your fight:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah well, I won't count those chicken just yet, CG. They're certainly making me work hard for it, that's for sure, presumably because I don't work hard enough for and with my kid as it is. :rolleyes:

 

Oh, clearly you're just bored and attempting to fill your otherwise empty days in the west wing of your DLA-funded mansion with a bit of frivolous litigation.... :p

 

I think I'll attempt to relieve the tedium by indulging in a long drive in the ole motability Roller now... :rolleyes:

 

All my fingers & toes crossed for you on the 3rd December, Bookworm.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well done, Bookie. ;)

If this has been useful to you, please click on the scales at bottom left of post. Thanks.

 

Advice & opinions of Rooster-UK are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

-------------------------------------------------------

LOOK! Free CAG Toolbar.

Follow link for more information.

 

------------------------------------------------------

Please donate,

Help us to help others.

 

 

LINKS....

 

Forum Rules.

FAQs....

Link to post
Share on other sites

bookie when ur over the shock can u tell us more.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They obviously couldn't work out any other way to get rid of you! :-D

 

Congratulations!

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow must be a big sum of money (if it's keeping bookie quiet :lol: :lol:)

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...