Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Help needed re: Citicards


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5559 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all, excellent and ver imformative site.

Read as much as I could about CC and cannot really find the answer to what I need and its time I acted on Citicards, the credit card people.

Back in the summer of last year, I called them to make an arrangement to pay. I offered XX amount which they declined (viasome call centre in the back of beyond, India I think fromt he accents of the people I spoke too) and then proposed an amount, which I agrred to.

Without fail I kept this up, paying at the end of every month, when I am paid. After the first payment, the phone calls started. I explained to whomever at the other end that I dont get paid until the end of the month so there was no point in ringing and that I had an agreement in place and would pay when I was paid, the last day of every month.

I even got a phone call to say I wsa £3.80 in arrears and would I pay now. They were very aggresive in seeking this money and thereafter, starting around the 10th of each month they ring every day, sometimes upwards of 10 times to my mobile and 10 times to my landline. On occaisons, I have answered, only for them to hang up, on both phones. Calls can start at 8am on a morning and even as late as 9.45pm at night

One one occaison, after I had paid the monthly amount agreed, I was called by CC saying I was in arrears and they needed payment over the phone. I stated I had made a verbal agreement, with which they had agreed too and they acknowledged that they had, yet after paying slightly more than the agreed amount, they were still harrasing me for payment. Also,I told them that due to debit card being cloned in the past, that I was not going to give my debit card details out to somone I dont know over the phone. I also pointed out and have done every time they called on the odd time they answered, that it was pointless ringing as I dont get paid until the end of the month, plus I was going to pay via my back account. They tried every means possible to get my debit card details, pay now, give us the card details and we will debit it when you say or at a certain time of the month, when you say etc etc etc

I think I was about £70 over the limit of the card at the time and then hit a few difficulties( including it effecting my health) and rang them to make arrangements, to stop the interest getting any bigger, but it did and at its highest was about £600, added via late payments ( even though I was paying via the arrangement) and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Phoning you a couple of times a week would constitute harassment, phoning you upto 10 times a day is clear harassment.

 

There is UK law in place which prevents them from doing this, its called the Protection From Harassment Act 1997.

 

A couple of things i'm going to suggest, firstly write a complaint to the Office Of Fair Trading stating what you have here - stating that you are being harassed when there is an agreement in place.

 

Enquiries Unit

Office of Fair Trading

Fleetbank House

2-6 Salisbury Square

London, EC4Y 8JX.

 

Secondly contact your local trading standards departments. Type your postcode into this site and it'll give you the details:

 

Trading Standards Central - Trading Standards and Consumer Protection information for the UK

 

They can prosecute under the Administration Of Justic Act 1970 if Citi Cards keep calling you.

 

I would consider stating to Citi that they contact you only in writing, and you will not entertain talking to them on the phone. You can try your hardest to reason with them, you can explain the same situation time and time again, but at the end of the day their Indian operators are there for only one purpose - and thats to try their hardest to extract money out of the customer by fair means or foul.

 

State that you've reported them to the Office Of Fair Trading, Trading Standards and will take them to court if they continue to call, then not answer or hang up on any subsequent calls, you'll probably recognise their number if you have caller ID.

 

Next I would consider claiming back any penalty charges that have been made against your account, and applying by means of a CCA request for a copy of your executed agreement.

 

Hope this is of help, if you need any further help or have questions let me know.

Advice offered by ENRON is without prejudice and is for your judgement as to whether to take it. You should seek the assistance or hire of a solicitor or other paid professional if in doubt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...