Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Our price is the same all day, but varies day to day. Yes there's a risk of high prices but it has never gone above SVR any time since I signed up. Last 30 days average 17.67p/kWh, max 20.67 and lowest was 11.83.  It saved just under £300 during 2023.  
    • It you had E7 in the past but have converted to single rate then the meter will still hold the last recorded Night readings. This introduces scope for error when manually reading. If the meter has only ever been used on single rate then there's only one figure that can be taken. For example ours shows "Rate 1" reading and a "Total import" reading, but they both give the sme figure. If it has ever been on E7 the total will be higher, including the retained night reading.
    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

roko20650 v Barclaycard


roko20650
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5409 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hiya roko20650

 

further to my post no 24

 

will be back to give you the link for the barclaycard case at court today

VERy interesting reading :D

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/165349-smt37-morgan-stanley-goldfish.html

 

have a sunny day

 

laters angel x

Im happy to help with support and my own thoughts, but if I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action.:)

 

my new motto is,,,",Taking back control of your life and home - such peace is priceless"

 

This is all due to truecall device , have a serious peek at this you will be thankful like I am x laters angel :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All, Just a quick with the latest letter about Barclaycard from Mercers, have not yet had time to read your link Sm37 will do later this evening, in the meantime what do you think of this, had anything similar, some advice as to what I should do next would be helpful. Roko

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi all, Some more advice please. Have received loads of calls and letters from Mercers and have in the main ignored, however, sent them a Subject Access Request on the 27th May, I think recorded delivery. This letter has crossed with that. What now?

 

Do they still have to reply as their letter attached says they will not enter into correspondence any more with us because they have supplied what they are required to do.

90528 Barclaycard DA.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all, Some more advice please. Have received loads of calls and letters from Mercers and have in the main ignored, however, sent them a Subject Access Request on the 27th May, I think recorded delivery. This letter has crossed with that. What now?

 

Do they still have to reply as their letter attached says they will not enter into correspondence any more with us because they have supplied what they are required to do.

 

Yes they still have to comply, a Data Access request is a seperate issue , they would be in breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 if they do not fully comply within 40 days .

As to the attached pdf , that is their opinion it would be wouldn't it , if there were no prescribed terms in the 'application form ' for example,how would you know what you were signing for .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi All, Now received a reply from Barclaycard to my Subject Access Request. I sent it on the 26th May and received it yesterday. All they have sent me is copies of statements of my account back to Jan 2004. There is nothing signed, no forms, no T&C's although the latest versions of these has been received before. They confirm in their letter that this is all they hold! What now, can they enforce the debt if they confirm they have nothing signed and are they allowed under Data Protection to pursue me through debt collector? I have been receiving regular calls and letters from Mercers who are threatening by phone call and letter to instruct local debt collectors to call at my home! Help and advice please on next step. Roko20650

Edited by roko20650
bad spelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

I am in a similar position with Halifax and HFC having sent them an SAR I've mostly recieved statements for my accounts but no agreements/default notice etc..... I have written back to them requesting them to include exactly the documents I require or to confirm that what they have sent me is all they hold on me in writing...

 

This is the key pint when sending an SAR, if you are no specific enough in what you require the bank will just send you statements as most pople send in SAR's to reclaim bank chanrges therefore, te bank assumes tis is the purpose of your SAR as well...... however, if you specify that you want agreements/default notices/notices of asginment and everything else that you want then they should send you this.... Maybe try writing back to them an advise them their response to your SAR remains incomplete as they have not sent all the info you requested, and then list exactly what it is you want from them, otherwise get them to confirm in writing that, that is all the info they hld on you....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Stressed150, The letter I sent is the very comprehensive one in the templates which clearly asks for everything they hold as you suggest above, and they have confirmed in their letter "this is all the information you hold" but that cannot be the case. I have had telephone conversations with them in the post requesting them to reduce the interest rate etc and they should be able to reproduce all that. So I'm suspicious. As I sent the request on the 20th May the 40 day period is now up. Do you know what happens now? Roko20650

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, if you know that they definitely should hold more info on you, then you need to write back stating that their response to your SAR is incomplete, and then state all the documents you do specifically require, I know you mentioned that you have already done this, however, most banks are aware of this website, and the template letters used from here, as I mentioned before, most people do tend to use the template letter you used when they want to reclaim bank charges only, hence all they want is bank statements, therefore, the bank will have assumed that you only wish to reclaim charges....therefore, even though you have already requested the info you require, you still need to write back to the bank and tell them again the info you specifically require, but my advise would be not to re-use the same template letter, but maybe write something in your own words so that they are aware you do require any other info..... This is what I have done approx 4 days ago, the bank have not written back to me just ye but once they do I'll let you know what they say.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

BTW, if Bcard confirm that they don't hold any further info, then that would surely be an admission to the fact that they don't have a CCA...... I'd be inclined to send them the 'I do not acknowledge this debt to you' letter and see what they have to say..... but maybe write the Response to SAR incomplete first and see what they have to say to that....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, Stressed 150m Yes I will do what you suggest. Both my husband and I have Barclaycards independently and they have just sent the exact same stuff to him. Just statements. I will write again and send Recorded and post here what there response is. Do you know what happens whenthey exceed the 40 days and they have in my husband's case?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...