Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx  
    • Well tbh that’s good news and something she can find out for herself.  She has no intention of peace.  I’m going to ask the thread stays open a little longer.   It seems she had not learned that I am just not the one!!!!  plus I have received new medical info from my vet today.   To remain within agreement, I need to generally ask for advice re:  If new medical information for the pup became apparent now - post agreement signing, that added proof a second genetic disease (tested for in those initial tests in the first case but relayed incorrectly to me then ), does it give me grounds for asking a court to unseal the deed so I can pursue this new info….. if she persists in being a pain ? If generally speaking, a first case was a cardiac issue that can be argued as both genetic and congenital until a genetic test is done and then a second absolute genetic only disease was then discovered, is that deemed a new case or grounds for unsealing? Make sense ?   This disease is only ever genetic!!!!   Rather more damning and indisputable proof of genetic disease breeding with no screening yk prevent.   The vet report showing this was uploaded in the original N1 pack.   Somehow rekeyed as normal when I was called with the results.   A vet visit today shows they were not normal and every symptom he has had reported in all reports uploaded from day one are related to the disease. 
    • Hi Roberto, Read some of the other threads here about S Sixes - they all follow the same routine of threats, threats, then nothing. When you do this, you'll see how many have been in exactly the same situation as you are. Keep us updated as necessary .............
    • Nationwide's takeover of Virgin Money is hitting the headlines as thousands of customers protest that they will not get a vote on whether it should happen.View the full article
    • unrelated to the agreement then, could have come from Lowells filing cabinet (who lowells - they dont do that - oh yes they do!! just look at a few lowell paypal EU court claim threads) no name and address for time of take out either which they MUST contain. just like the rest of the agreement then..utter bogroll that proves nothing toward you ... slippery lowells as usual it's only a case management discussion on 26 April 2024 at 10:00am by WebEx. thats good simply refer to the responses you made on your 4a form response only. pleanty of SPC thread here to read before the 26th i suggest you read at least one a day. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CCA Advice & Unauthorised Overdraft


vusys1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5534 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Ive posted this on another section,but ive had no advice:(, so i`ll give you the story so far.

 

Following payment problems with a FD loan & CC, I called them to see if I could make reduced payments,they agreed.(so far so good)

 

Then they say we are now withdrawing our banking services (had to change all my DD`s,open new account etc), but i must pay the agreed amount into the account.

 

a few months down the line I check online and find that they had amalgamated the loan & cc into an overdraft on the now closed defunked account,(which i didnt agree to,no APR mention etc). I am requesting a DSAR

 

I requested the CCA for both loan & CC on the 25.11.08,they received on the 26.11.08. I did not get a reply & the copies until the 7.1.09.

 

The CCA for the CC is unreadable (it is a true copy but out of focus),there also doesnt appear to be any CC limit or APR etc on the form.

 

Do I request another copy or report them for being over the 30 days before replying?:confused:

 

Onto the overdraft,after i wrote back asking the reason for the OD, i received a letter dated the 03.01.09 confirming my request for an informal overdraft,bog standard automated letter issued following my enquiry. (6 months after they actioned the OD,now they write to me).

 

I then receive a letter dated the 19.01.09 to clarify why the OD was setup & that I verbally confirmed this was ok(hence the DSAR).

 

If they are unable to supply a copy of the call outlining everything etc is the now uninforceable as I do not have a CCA(they didnt send 1):confused:

 

They also confirmed that due to their error no letter was issued to confirm this agreement or a CCA form(they said they will send this later),they kindly supplied a back dated letter dated 17.07.08 and advised that this is a template and this is what would have been sent.

 

It states "Any formal overdraft facility is cancelled,as are any direct debits,standing orders and automated bill payments which were previously paid from your accounts"

 

(whats the diff between formal & informal overdrafts).:confused:

 

it then goes on to say:

 

"A Consumer Credit Agreement Act form will be issued under separate cover. This document confirms the amount and term of the repayments and the interest rate to be charged.It also confirms that provided you make the repayments as agreed FD will not take any further action against you. I must advise you that if the CCA form is not received, the agreement will no longer be valid and I may have no alternative but to issue final demand for the full payment of the total outstand balance".

 

Can they now issue a CCA 6 months down the line and enforce it?:-|

any replys much appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ive posted this on another section,but ive had no advice:(, so i`ll give you the story so far.

 

Following payment problems with a FD loan & CC, I called them to see if I could make reduced payments,they agreed.(so far so good)

 

Then they say we are now withdrawing our banking services (had to change all my DD`s,open new account etc), but i must pay the agreed amount into the account.

 

a few months down the line I check online and find that they had amalgamated the loan & cc into an overdraft on the now closed defunked account,(which i didnt agree to,no APR mention etc). I am requesting a DSAR

 

I requested the CCA for both loan & CC on the 25.11.08,they received on the 26.11.08. I did not get a reply & the copies until the 7.1.09.

 

The CCA for the CC is unreadable (it is a true copy but out of focus),there also doesnt appear to be any CC limit or APR etc on the form.

 

Do I request another copy or report them for being over the 30 days before replying?:confused:

Write to them putting the account into dispute outlining the legibilty of the CCA. The 30 day rule is no longer valid so you can't report them.

 

Onto the overdraft,after i wrote back asking the reason for the OD, i received a letter dated the 03.01.09 confirming my request for an informal overdraft,bog standard automated letter issued following my enquiry. (6 months after they actioned the OD,now they write to me).

 

I then receive a letter dated the 19.01.09 to clarify why the OD was setup & that I verbally confirmed this was ok(hence the DSAR).

 

If they are unable to supply a copy of the call outlining everything etc is the now uninforceable as I do not have a CCA(they didnt send 1):confused:

No, the accounts cannot be made unenforceable as an Subject Access Request is made under the Data Protection Act and not the Consumer Credit Act.

 

They also confirmed that due to their error no letter was issued to confirm this agreement or a CCA form(they said they will send this later),they kindly supplied a back dated letter dated 17.07.08 and advised that this is a template and this is what would have been sent.

 

It states "Any formal overdraft facility is cancelled,as are any direct debits,standing orders and automated bill payments which were previously paid from your accounts"

 

(whats the diff between formal & informal overdrafts).:confused:

 

it then goes on to say:

 

"A Consumer Credit Agreement Act form will be issued under separate cover. This document confirms the amount and term of the repayments and the interest rate to be charged.It also confirms that provided you make the repayments as agreed FD will not take any further action against you. I must advise you that if the CCA form is not received, the agreement will no longer be valid and I may have no alternative but to issue final demand for the full payment of the total outstand balance".

 

?????????????? - Please can you confirm that First Direct have written the above paragraph.

I find it hard to understand this.

They are advising you that if the form is not received, they will issue a final demand ?

 

Can they now issue a CCA 6 months down the line and enforce it?:-|

 

 

any replys much appreciated

 

Yes - If they have a valid agreement then they can enforce it whenever.

 

 

May be good if you can scan and post up the CCA's after removing your personal details.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

May be good if you can scan and post up the CCA's after removing your personal details.

 

the CCA for the loan is correct,but the CCA for the CC is just a blur with my signature and credit card application form the on elidgible words

 

Hi,thanks for the reply.My scanner is kaput at the mo,but the paragraph i quoted was word for word from the letter they said they would have sent when they amalgamated the loan & CC into the overdraft.

 

I have today received a CCA which they want signed and & returned within 7 days otherwise they will refer to a DCA.

 

I still want the DSAR as no terms,interest rate etc was explained over the phone.

 

If they zero the o/s on the loan & CC and no put it into this overdraft (which i still dispute) and have failed to supply a CCA at the time,how can they insist I sign this one & return within 7 days.

 

Can i insist that i am allowed more time to request the DSAR? as they claim everything was explained to me on the phone?

Link to post
Share on other sites

letters from FD

 

1. confirmation of my CCA request

2. letter out of the blue confirming my request for the OD

3. letter explaining why the OD

4. template of a letter they should have sent in July 08

5.New CCA for the OD (note threat at the bottom)

6.New CCA (note that on final payment o/s balance & interest is to paid)

fd1.jpg

fd2.jpg

fd3.jpg

fd4.jpg

fd5.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

well FD have sent a reply stating they are unable to get a better copy but have stated that their current terms and conditions apply etc they also sent a photocopy of another application(not mine) which has had the name signature name crudely blanked out??? (no other personal details on the form), as this is a better copy they say this is what my form would have looked like ( i have compared the 2 and they are not similar in any way,baring in mind all i can see on my copy is my name).

 

they have also kinndly sent me a final demand for the outstanding 10k & are threating Sols & DCA if i do not reply,despite my letter stating the account was in dispute.

 

Any advise please on my next letter I can send? i was thinking of telling them that CC debt is unenforcible and needs to be removed???

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...