Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5497 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone I have a problem with b&s bailiffs so I am hoping someone can help.

I have a debt for c/t which when passed to the bailiffs stood at 1276.25

They turned up I let him in which I now was silly but I can’t turn the clock back. They charge me on that day – 61.00 levy fee 12.00 walking possession fee and 24.50 redemption fee.

He tells me I have to make a payment of 73.00 and further payments of £200 a month which I told him I couldn’t afford but he just shrugged his shoulders.

I make the £73 payment and then a £110 payment the following month but didn’t make anymore. I get home from work one day to find a note pushed through the door saying a bailiff removal team had called the balance now said I owe £1420.31 but it didn’t say anything about fees added I then make regular payments but was sometimes a little late but I always got in touch to explain and everything was ok then a payment was £10.00 short which wouldn’t have been but because of their 4 % charge for debit card payments I was a few pounds short in my bank so I thought it would be better to pay most of it and the 10.00 that it was short the following payday but a week later a bailiff turned up to remove my goods he stood there threatening and in the end I told him to take what he wanted he then gave me a removal letter which said he would accept £150 a month but had charged a 230 fee

I have got an itemised statement from b&s its says I have paid a total of 1263.75 they have added 557.50 in fees which includes two van/abortive removal fees plus 30 in debit card fees and £701.25 has been paid to the council I still owe £600 which is 575.50 to council and £24 in fees.

I have read that they can only charge you twice for a removal van and the second time they must take the items but I have been charged but they didn’t take the items in fact he didn’t have any intentions of doing, but I don’t know what I can actually do about it, could I get these fees back?

Also when they sent the statement there is another debt been added for this year (this is because the council wouldn’t help me out even when I went to see them personally to explain I couldn’t pay bailiffs and this years at the same time) do they have to gain entry again for this other debt or can they just break in because they have entered for the last one?

I’m really sorry for the long post and hope someone can help me sort this

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh Dear if its the same bailiffs you have signed a walking possession I think they can

 

But I think you need to wait for someone with more experience with this

 

perhaps tomtubby will be along soon

 

 

 

 

I am sure the fee's are not right though

Link to post
Share on other sites

have a debt for c/t which when passed to the bailiffs stood at 1276.25

They turned up I let him in which I now was silly but I can’t turn the clock back. They charge me on that day – 61.00 levy fee 12.00 walking possession fee and 24.50 redemption fee.

 

Have you checked to see if the bailiff had a valid certificate to collect for b&s on the day he made the levy?

 

 

I have got an itemised statement from b&s its says I have paid a total of 1263.75 they have added 557.50 in fees which includes two van/abortive removal fees plus 30 in debit card fees and £701.25 has been paid to the council I still owe £600 which is 575.50 to council and £24 in fees.

 

They can't charge for not taking goods - the law does not allow them to just turn up with a van and take them anyway - they have to give you notice that includes a date and a time.

 

They can charge £1.00 maximum for each debit card transaction.

 

 

Ok, so you should have received a copy of schedule 5 of the council tax enforcement regulations, from which you can work out what they should have charged you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the quick reply

I didn't check if they had a certificate never thought to.

I can't remember if I had notice of the first time they called with a van I don't think they did I have all the letters and notices they have sent me I will have a look to make sure, but I do know they defently didn't give me notice the second time as it was not that long ago.

So what can I do about it the council are not interested and I don't know where to start with a letter?

Also I thought the council had to give you two weeks notice that they had passed the debt on I only got 8 days from the date of the letter to them calling, this can be proved by dates on the letters I have.

Because of the second debt they have put my payment up by £85 per month to £235 per month which I can not afford so I am frightened they will call again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So what can I do about it the council are not interested and I don't know where to start with a letter?

 

This is a bit of a dogs dinner really.

 

I would start from the beginning and make a polite but formal complaint about each item, separately.

 

Begin a with a series of emails and letter writing about 3-4 days apart, do it in an organised fashion, treat it like a military campaign, so that it all comes together in a credible form 4 complaint.

 

Don't expect them to respond to the first letters, but by the time they've received the 3rd, 4th, 5th they'll have spent a lot of time reading about their mistakes and it will begin to occur to them that you're no longer a pushover, and that this might end badly for their bailiff.

 

Each complaint should take the form of an email to the bailiffs cc'd to the council tax dept, the head of the council tax dept, your local councillor and your MP, back it up with a hard copy sent recorded delivery to the bailiffs.

 

Have a template set up so all you have to do is change the date, and change the content.

 

1st letter should be about the first visit

2nd letter should be about the second visit

3rd letter should be in response to their response to the 1st letter, etc.

 

By the time two or three weeks have gone by you will have become the most expensive item of administration by far, and you will have their full attention - so by the time you threaten a form 4 complaint they will take it seriously, if they haven't done something about it already.

 

if you go through my link you will see that all my letters follow a pattern

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bailiffs-sheriff-officers/120845-rossendales-final-reminder-i.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again please don’t get annoyed but to just make sure before I start could you just confirm these points

I should have been given two weeks notice from the date of the letter from the council to the bailiff calling is this the law?

This call is classed as a first visit and those charges he charged was correct

(Not sure what a redemption fee is)

The second visit was with a van which he charged me 230 for but set up another arrangement (under his terms) according to the list of fees the council sent me they can charge you reasonable cost for one visit with a van

The third visit was with a van again I was charged another 230 and another arrangement was set up, should he have taken my items then and not set up another agreement?

I should have only been charged £1.00 max per card transaction even though it says 4% on their website and letters.

Also one more sorry to be a pain but what do I do about payments do I still keep paying or stop for the moment.

Again thanks I have to leave the computer now but will check back tomorrow so I can get the ball rolling.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send this one to the bailiffs with you filling in your details

 

re: YOUR ADDRESS

 

YOUR COUNCIL appears to have instructed you to recover unpaid council tax from me.

 

This letter gives you notice that you are not being given peaceful entry to my home or to levy goods contained within and I will not be signing anything for you. This notice revokes your eligibility to charge a Walking Possessions fee or other fee relating to the handling of goods.

 

Due to my circumstances I am unable to pay the debt as you demanded because it is unrealistic. I have sent an affordable payment direct to the council along with a written schedule of repayments.

 

Please be advised it is not a "criminal offence" for me to deny a bailiff entry to my property, the law says I have to settle the debt; it does not obligate me to do business with you. If you suggest to me otherwise I will automatically report you to the police and you may receive a criminal record.

 

I AM NOT REFUSING TO PAY THIS DEBT.

 

Meanwhile please provide me with a written breakdown of your fees you have demanded and put it through the letterbox and quietly leave the property. If your fees are found to contradict Regulation 45(2) of the Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992 I will automatically file a Form 4 complaint against you at your certificating court for attempting to defraud me under Sections 2 and 4 of the Fraud Act 2006.

 

This document was sent to you recorded delivery to the above address and a copy was sent to HEAD OF council tax Recovery Dept.

 

Please also supply me with a breakdown of the fee's you have charged me

 

 

Yours Faithfully

 

 

 

 

AND THIS ONE obviously fill in your details to the council and enclose a payment plan that you can afford for the ct you owe

 

Re: your details

On DATE I was visited by your bailiff collecting unpaid council tax who overcharged me with his fees. We were unable to reach an amicable resolve and the bailiff showed threatening behaviour and became vexatious in nature. I also received a letter stating I should pay WHAT THEY ASKED YOU per month to clear the debt which is unrealistic with my present financial state.

 

I now ask the council to:

 

a) Take the case back from the bailiff.

b) Accept my original offer to pay £10.00 extra of what I pay already a week to clear the arrears

c) Pay me a reasonable compensation for my inconvenience and for my efforts in seeking discovery of information and

d) Receiving an over-zealous bailiff acting for you making unrealistic demands of money.

 

If you fail to satisfactorily complete the above I will automatically escalate the complaint to the Local Government Ombudsman in=2 0fourteen days from the date of this letter.

 

Due to my circumstances I am unable to pay the debt as demanded by the bailiffs and I will make payment of £10.00 each week for 249 weekly installments with a final installment of £9.80 This may seem a long time but it's all I can afford and allows me to pay future liabilities without falling into arrears. I confirm I am not refusing to pay this debt.

 

This letter is delivered by Royal Mail and I deem it to be served on you by the ordinary course of Recorded post in the meaning of Section 7 of the Interpretation Act 1978. It is your responsibility and in your own interests this letter is handed to the relevant person within your organisation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again please don’t get annoyed but to just make sure before I start could you just confirm these points

 

I couldn't get annoyed, I've been just where you are now, full of uncertainty, wanting to believe that bailiffs and council workers have lied to me, but afraid that they actually do have the law on their side.

 

And that is exactly what they count on.

 

 

I should have been given two weeks notice from the date of the letter from the council to the bailiff calling is this the law?

 

By law, the local authority must give you 14 days written notice that the Liability Order is being transferred to their relevant bailiff company for collection. This is from tomtubbys commercial website, and she knows her stuff.

 

 

first visit and those charges he charged was correct (Not sure what a redemption fee is)

 

Neither am I, so I'd suspect it's not correct unless someone I trust tells me different.

 

The second visit was with a van which he charged me 230 for but set up another arrangement (under his terms) according to the list of fees the council sent me they can charge you reasonable cost for one visit with a van

 

I think you mean section 1A of schedule 5 shown in this link here?The Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992

 

Well here's a newsflash for the bailiffs, 1A doesn't say that anymore

The Council Tax and Non-Domestic Rating (Amendment) (England) Regulations 2006

 

 

The second visit was with a van which he charged me 230 for but set up another arrangement (under his terms) according to the list of fees the council sent me they can charge you reasonable cost for one visit with a van

The third visit was with a van again I was charged another 230 and another arrangement was set up, should he have taken my items then and not set up another agreement?

 

If he didn't remove anything, then he can't charge for removal, and definitely not for a third visit.

 

I should have only been charged £1.00 max per card transaction even though it says 4% on their website and letters.

 

I'm told that there is case law to support the £1.00 maximum, Ambershadow had some info as I recall - don't believe anything on a councils website unless it agrees with the law, or tomtubbys website or insolvency org

 

Also one more sorry to be a pain but what do I do about payments do I still keep paying or stop for the moment.

 

At this point keep paying, until you've got the ball rolling, what you're looking for is the council calling a halt to enforcement while your complaints are investigated - you don't want to give them any excuse right now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There has been a ruling stating that a bailiff can not charge for the use of a credit card (December 2007). As far as I know this also applies to Debit cards but TT was waiting for this to be clarified. I know this ruling does not apply to High Court Enforcement Officers but the threat of taking a credit card charge for taxing was enough to make them refund it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

omg can you lot believe I wrote to bristow and sutor about charging me for the second removel with a van fee and asked them to remove it and they have wrote back apologising for there mistake and heve refunded it no arrguments or lies just refunded it, that has just made my day thankyou everyone for your advice with out you i wouldn't have done it. x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

hi all.

i need some help i to owe money to my local council and its alot £4000 but i found it hard to keep up my council tax payments and over the years and charges from bistow and sutor it all adds up any way here is my story.

 

in june 2007 b&s turned up and i open the door and let them in only because he told me i had to as he had the law on his side so i did and i also had to pay £278 that day, i made an greement to pay £200 amonth but i was 1 day late paying it and they cancel the agreement and said that there coming for my belongings any way i had to move house and they found me 12month later and ive been trying to come to an agreement with them but they keep stating that i have to pay £940 amonth i cant afford that kind of money.

i have even offerd my child benifit money but thats not good enough (297 amonth ) they have been back about 5times now and keep pushing the letters though my door stating that a removel team come today to remove my goods.

the thing is i dont have half of what they levied on can they still take things that they havent listed and thay also now that i have a disabled daughter and they even tryed to take that can someone please help me i dont what to do i have even wrote to the courts for help amd the council dont want to know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

omg can you lot believe I wrote to bristow and sutor about charging me for the second removel with a van fee and asked them to remove it and they have wrote back apologising for there mistake and heve refunded it no arrguments or lies just refunded it, that has just made my day thankyou everyone for your advice with out you i wouldn't have done it. x

Now you know how Moses must have felt as the waters parted :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi all.

i need some help i to owe money to my local council and its alot £4000 but i found it hard to keep up my council tax payments and over the years and charges from bistow and sutor it all adds up any way here is my story.

 

in june 2007 b&s turned up and i open the door and let them in only because he told me i had to as he had the law on his side so i did and i also had to pay £278 that day, i made an greement to pay £200 amonth but i was 1 day late paying it and they cancel the agreement and said that there coming for my belongings any way i had to move house and they found me 12month later and ive been trying to come to an agreement with them but they keep stating that i have to pay £940 amonth i cant afford that kind of money.

i have even offerd my child benifit money but thats not good enough (297 amonth ) they have been back about 5times now and keep pushing the letters though my door stating that a removel team come today to remove my goods.

the thing is i dont have half of what they levied on can they still take things that they havent listed and thay also now that i have a disabled daughter and they even tryed to take that can someone please help me i dont what to do i have even wrote to the courts for help amd the council dont want to know.

 

Charlene, you really need to start your own thread -- but to answer your questions:

 

You don't say what your personal situation is; but if you are a single parent caring for disabled daughter then you may fall into the category of "vulnerable person". On that basis alone the bailiffs should hand the account back to the council.

 

I hope you now know that bailiffs have no right of entry unless you have left them into your house before, and as they haven't been into present house you don't have to let them in. You should keep all letters that they have given you. They can't levy in June 2007 and rely upon that seizure in March 2009 because they will have abandoned the 2007 seizure. So they can't come into your house and take anything. In my opinion if you want to pay anyone, pay the council direct online.

 

Please start your own thread, and please tell us a bit more about your situation -- minus identifying details of course. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...