Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • OK, you made a bad mistake by outing yourself as the driver. But that's not fatal.  It's a case of one argument unfortunately down, but lots of other arguments still standing.  Chiefly that this is a scam site with an invisible line separating two car parks in order to entrap motorists. 1.  As LFI says, send a SAR to MET so you can get your hands on their original invoice.  Invest in a 2nd class stamp and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office. 2.  About six months ago, when the tsunami of cases at this site started, lots of Caggers contacted the CEO of Starbucks  https://www.ceoemail.com/s.php?id=ceo-82463&c=Starbucks UK-General Manager  Starbucks then contacted EuroGarages which seems to be another company in their group, and which runs the Stansted branch, and which got the invoice withdrawn.  However, after one, two, 10, 20 of these cases Starbucks seemed to get fed up.  However, it's only an e-mail, and surely worth a shot.  Lay it on thick about being a regular Starbucks customer but on this occasion you found the branch closed, and it is completely unfair to be charged £100 for briefly stopping in a car park while trying to use Starbucks. The main point here though is that MET are very, very wary of starting court cases for this site.  If they don't do court there's no reason to pay them.
    • Thanks jk2054, you were indeed correct. I've received the court order requesting documents and the witness statement etc. which I will read through and begin to compile shortly.
    • Find out what these WhatsApp scams are and what to do if you receive a message from a scammerView the full article
    • You need to send Met an SAR and they will send you the original PCN .. However all their PCNs appear to be the same and as the car parks are on airport land the keeper is not liable for the debt. Only the driver is responsible. But there are other considerations which can be enough for you to win. Poorly lit signage; scam site, it's a penalty; as well as problems with the contract. So you have a lot of things going for you as well as Met are not keen to take well defended cases to Court.  
    • The brand, which runs 216 shops as well as franchised stores, is looking at ways to save cash.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

brighthouse telephoning me


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5524 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi im wondering iof someone can help i was 3 weeks behind with my account as we are struggling i have brought it to the attention of the brighthouse store manager and got no help, so anyway 1 week before christmas my step dad died and ive had a bad time of it then i ended up with pneumonia because i was run down and from the 3rd of january up to today my account was late and what happened was yesterday brighthouse phoned on the shop number and let it ring constantly off the hook without pause for 20 mins then put phone down for 5 mins and repeated it again then they phoned on a witheld number and then a mobile number i know this numbers were them as they did this once before ive had to have my phone constantly unplugged for the last 3 weeks as this is how i was hounded from the day after i went late. as ive found out because of my phone being unplugged my mum could nt get hold of me and not fogetting shes just lost her husband of 22 years so she was nt in a good state

 

hopefully somone can advise me

 

thanks

donna

Link to post
Share on other sites

We sure can. There are a couple of letters that you need to send asap (recorded delivery to Head Office and your branch). First of all - send this harassment letter - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/37006-harassment-telephone-response-letter.html. At least then we can get that phone plugged back in.

 

Also, you need to send a letter regarding your situation. Adapt the following to suit:

 

Account(s) number(s) XXXXXXXXX

 

Dear Sirs

 

I have recently been experiencing some financial difficulties and, as a result, have fallen behind with my weekly payments to BrightHouse. This is most regrettable, so please accept my apologies

 

I do not wish to return the goods voluntarily, and as I cannot afford to pay this amount in one instalment, I would like to offer the sum of £(reasonable amount) per week on top of my regular weekly payment of £XX to clear my arrears over the next XX weeks. This payment plan can start immediately.

 

I have made this proposal (and made an offer of payment) at my local store, but my payment was refused. I was told that BrightHouse will not/cannot accept “part payments”. This “policy” only places my account(s) further into arrears and invokes further penalty charges. I find this both immoral, unfair and in direct contravention to OFT guidelines regarding the collection of debt.

 

Naturally, I hope you will accept my offer (above) and allow me time to bring my account(s) up to date in both a fair and affordable way. Of course, by accepting my offer, and by me maintaining regular payments (on time) you agree NOT to apply any further “penalty” or “late payment” charges to my account(s).

 

Please confirm in writing your acceptance or refusal of my offer in order for me to make the necessary payment arrangements, or to prepare for my defence in the County Court as appropriate.

 

Kindest Regards

 

YOU

 

That's just for starters. Please try not to panic, you have come to the right place :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Explain about your illness if you want (maybe instead of financial difficulties you could state personal and/or health issues). It's entirely up to you.

 

Sorry, should have mentioned - don't phone them anymore. Put everything in writing. Brighthouse can't bully you in writing as they can on the phone as the simply would not get away with it.

Edited by BankFodder
Link to post
Share on other sites

hi im wondering iof someone can help i was 3 weeks behind with my account as we are struggling i have brought it to the attention of the brighthouse store manager and got no help, so anyway 1 week before christmas my step dad died and ive had a bad time of it then i ended up with pneumonia because i was run down and from the 3rd of january up to today my account was late and what happened was yesterday brighthouse phoned on the shop number and let it ring constantly off the hook without pause for 20 mins then put phone down for 5 mins and repeated it again then they phoned on a witheld number and then a mobile number i know this numbers were them as they did this once before ive had to have my phone constantly unplugged for the last 3 weeks as this is how i was hounded from the day after i went late. as ive found out because of my phone being unplugged my mum could nt get hold of me and not fogetting shes just lost her husband of 22 years so she was nt in a good state

 

hopefully somone can advise me

 

thanks

donna

 

Hi there. Sorry to hear you've been having a rough time lately.

 

Basically, you have two realistic options - which very much depend upon how far into your agreements you are...

 

1 - If you can no longer afford the repayments on your hire purchase agreement(s) you could simply arrange to return the goods and walk away. (BrightHouse won't bother to chase you for any outstanding debt)... or

 

2 - If you are further than one third into your agreement(s), you could try and negotiate reduced payments for a while... This is actually harder than extracting your own teeth, but people have succeeded in the past.

 

You will find all the details (and letter templates) you need in our BrightHouse fact sheet HERE

 

Clemma (an excellent contributor on here) has probably already done this, but if she hasn't ask her to post her harrassment letter for you. Sounds like you need it.

 

 

Cheers

Lefty

Edited by BankFodder

If the left side of the brain controls your right, and the right side controls your left, then left-handed people are always in their right mind!

 

Please help to support this site with a small donation... every little helps...

 

CAG- The Nation's Weekly Info Store!

;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Clemma (an excellent contributor on here) has probably already done this, but if she hasn't ask her to post her harrassment letter for you. Sounds like you need it.

 

 

 

Already done mate ;)

Edited by BankFodder
Link to post
Share on other sites

i have just paid it up to date but what im upset with is the harrasement i will send the letter harrasement by telephone letter and await response thanks for your help

Edited by BankFodder
Link to post
Share on other sites

also whilst im thinking on i sent a letter similar to this about 6 months ago and the harrasement stopped i can afford to pay but i suffer with M E and i struggle to deal with things also i have only 1 month left on 2 agreements and 1 year on another also one item i intend sending back as it is no essential but ive asked em to take it back before and they would nt

Link to post
Share on other sites

also whilst im thinking on i sent a letter similar to this about 6 months ago and the harrasement stopped i can afford to pay but i suffer with M E and i struggle to deal with things also i have only 1 month left on 2 agreements and 1 year on another also one item i intend sending back as it is no essential but ive asked em to take it back before and they would nt

 

If I was you, I would ask for settlement figures on those 2 agreements with only a month to run. You'll be surprised as to how little you will actually owe.

 

If you have paid more than half of the other agreement, then you can give it back with NO penalties whatsoever, no matter what they say.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I was you, I would ask for settlement figures on those 2 agreements with only a month to run. You'll be surprised as to how little you will actually owe.

 

If you have paid more than half of the other agreement, then you can give it back with NO penalties whatsoever, no matter what they say.

 

Correct - as long as the account has not been defaulted and/or in arrears. (Just need to make that clear) ;)

 

 

Cheers

Lefty

If the left side of the brain controls your right, and the right side controls your left, then left-handed people are always in their right mind!

 

Please help to support this site with a small donation... every little helps...

 

CAG- The Nation's Weekly Info Store!

;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh and i did try putting things in writting but i just got a nasty home visit by the store manager

 

I have the ideal letter for this: (print a copy out and have it by your front door)

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Account Ref xxxx

 

Please be advised that I will only communicate with you in writing.

 

Should it be your intention to arrange a “doorstep call”, please be advised that under OFT rules, you can only visit me at my home if you make an appointment and I have no wish to make an appointment with you.

 

There is only an implied license under English Common Law for people to be able to visit me on my property without express permission; the postman and people asking for directions etc (Armstrong v. Sheppard and Short Ltd [1959] 2 Q.B. per Lord Evershed M.R.). Therefore take note that I revoke license under Common Law for you, or your representatives to visit me at my property and if you do so, then you will be liable to damages for a tort of trespass and action will be taken, including but not limited to, police attendance.

 

Yours faithfully

 

Next time one of these fools turn up at your door, hand this over and slam the door. They have as much right as the local paperboy to enter your home!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Correct - as long as the account has not been defaulted and/or in arrears. (Just need to make that clear) ;)

 

 

Cheers

Lefty

 

That has been logged in my brain with the rest of the information already stuffed in there - phew

Link to post
Share on other sites

Correct - as long as the account has not been defaulted and/or in arrears. (Just need to make that clear) ;)

 

 

Cheers

Lefty

 

Just need to clear this in my head - by defaulted you mean a default notice or is it something else?

 

As for the arrears, if you have been in arrears AT ALL during the agreement, does this stop the entitlement to hand back the goods after half has been paid off. Or, do you still have the entitlement as long as the agreement isn't in arrears at the time you want to return them.

 

Sorry this sounds rather garbled, but I'm confused :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just need to clear this in my head - by defaulted you mean a default notice or is it something else?

 

As for the arrears, if you have been in arrears AT ALL during the agreement, does this stop the entitlement to hand back the goods after half has been paid off. Or, do you still have the entitlement as long as the agreement isn't in arrears at the time you want to return them.

 

Sorry this sounds rather garbled, but I'm confused :confused:

 

Actually, you got me confuddled now... Gonna go and check it out.

 

Lefty

If the left side of the brain controls your right, and the right side controls your left, then left-handed people are always in their right mind!

 

Please help to support this site with a small donation... every little helps...

 

CAG- The Nation's Weekly Info Store!

;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Next time one of these fools turn up at your door, hand this over and slam the door. They have as much right as the local paperboy to enter your home!!

 

 

Actually your wrong here!

 

The paperboy has more rights, as you have a sort of contract with the newsagent, allowing them to walk onto your property in order to deliver the paper, much like the post man.

 

This letter revokes any right for BH to walk on your property.

 

Not picking hairs or anything!!

PlumberJon :-D

 

UNUS VIR OBVIAM ORBIS TERRARUM

 

Are you being harrassed by a DCA or Brighthouse. Click the link for OFT Debt collection guidelines. Chances are, they could be in breach of some part of sections 2 or 3 or both!

 

http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/business_leaflets/consumer_credit/oft664.pdf

 

 

I just give advice, I can't do it for you though!!

 

If you were helped, then please wiggle my scales, and you might get a wiggle back!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually your wrong here!

 

The paperboy has more rights, as you have a sort of contract with the newsagent, allowing them to walk onto your property in order to deliver the paper, much like the post man.

 

This letter revokes any right for BH to walk on your property.

 

Not picking hairs or anything!!

 

:mad::p

 

I said to enter the home - of which the paperboy has no rights either - hence my comparison. Feeling picked on now :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh OK sorry, I guess I'm letting my excitement get the better of me a bit, so slap me!!!

PlumberJon :-D

 

UNUS VIR OBVIAM ORBIS TERRARUM

 

Are you being harrassed by a DCA or Brighthouse. Click the link for OFT Debt collection guidelines. Chances are, they could be in breach of some part of sections 2 or 3 or both!

 

http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/business_leaflets/consumer_credit/oft664.pdf

 

 

I just give advice, I can't do it for you though!!

 

If you were helped, then please wiggle my scales, and you might get a wiggle back!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Donza

 

The late fees are unlawful and you can claim them back - see my BH thread http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/53098-steven4064-brighthouse.html

 

Also I prefer a rather more strongly worded telephone harassment letter - after the preamble about the calls you have recieved:

I would like to point out that this behaviour constitutes harassment under ss1&2 of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 –

 

1 Prohibition of harassment

(1) A person must not pursue a course of conduct—

(a) which amounts to harassment of another, and

(b) which he knows or ought to know amounts to harassment of the other.

(2) For the purposes of this section, the person whose course of conduct is in question ought to know that it amounts to harassment of another if a reasonable person in possession of the same information would think the course of conduct amounted to harassment of the other…

 

2 Offence of harassment

(1) A person who pursues a course of conduct in breach of section 1 is guilty of an offence.

(2) A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable on summary conviction to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months, or a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale, or both...

 

Further, this behaviour is also an offence under s127(2)© of the Communications 2003 –

 

127 Improper use of public electronic communications network

 

(2) A person is guilty of an offence if, for the purpose of causing annoyance, inconvenience or needless anxiety to another, he—

© persistently makes use of a public electronic communications network.

(3) A person guilty of an offence under this section shall be liable, on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months or to a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale, or to both...

 

I am writing to you to impress on you the seriousness of your actions. If I receive any further calls relating to this matter, I will give the facts to the local police, naming the [name of company] employees involved and any senior managers I deem to be responsible. I also reserve the right to civil remedy under s3 of the Protection from Harassment Act and also enforcement action under s4 of that Act and s129 of the Communications Act via OFCOM.

 

Please do not phone concerning this matter. If you need to communicate with me, write to the above address. The only correspondence I am prepared to entertain is a confirmation that you are going to cease this campaign of harassment. Any other correspondence will also be deemed to constitute part of the same campaign.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just need to clear this in my head - by defaulted you mean a default notice or is it something else?

 

As for the arrears, if you have been in arrears AT ALL during the agreement, does this stop the entitlement to hand back the goods after half has been paid off. Or, do you still have the entitlement as long as the agreement isn't in arrears at the time you want to return them.

 

Sorry this sounds rather garbled, but I'm confused :confused:

 

Actually, you got me confuddled now... Gonna go and check it out.

 

Lefty

 

Did you ever find out? I don't want to give out wrong information.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Donza, if the harassment letter doesn't do the trick then try writing and ask why they are deliberately discriminating against someone who has a medical condition (M.E) by failing to communicate clearly/fairly in writing as requested and is this an active policy by their company or just the actions of a rogue and intolerant employee?

 

If the later, does this employee have the tacit endorsement by their company to allow such disadvantaged persons to be harassed on a daily basis and treated unfairly and does their company sanction such prejudiced behaviour?

 

Also, are any of these calls silent automated dialers? Is there always a human being at the other end or does it hang up with nobody there? If so, then a complaint to OFCOM would be in order as they class more than one silent call by a company's computer system within a 72hr period as harassment.

 

Silent calls (when you answer the phone, there is nobody there) | Ofcom

:!: -Any advise I give is based purely on my own experience. It should not be solely relied upon as I am NOT a legal expert and any major decisions you make should not be based on my opinion alone -

HFC Bank - Davey vs HFC

Barclays - Monthly payments made

Cahoot - Agreement received, awaiting 2nd agreement after DCA.

MBNA1&2 - Agreements received. (Currently in limbo)

Halifax - Davey vs Halifax/Cabot

MINT - Davey vs Mint

Amex - Davey vs Amex

Cap1 **WON** £1,500 Written Off Davey vs Cap1

 

Never Sign Anything

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...