Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Do you think I should send the CCA request now then instead of waiting? I really can do without the stress. Any advice would be appreciated. Thank you for responding.
    • How was the "receiver" appointed and what is their role? Appointed by the lender under the terms of their security on the loan (sometimes referred to as "LPA Receiver")? Or are they acting for you in insolveny? What's the current role of the agent?
    • Wait for more replies, but that letter to me can be interpreted as a letter before action. Ignoring it can have consequences. The court to impose sanctions for failure in responding to a letter of claim.
    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

F/T salary reduced without written notice?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5567 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi folk's I could really use some help on this one as I feel a bit aggrieved with my employer.

 

The short version is:

 

I have 8 yrs with my employer and am on a F/T permanent contract with a monthly salary. I am entitled to 12 weeks company sick pay which I have received this year due to 2 periods of absence amounting to 13wks. (Have had 1 wk on SSP) I have just returned to work after having 5 weeks off sick due to major pain caused by a prolapsed disc and am on reduced hours because my problem still exists. Days before I was due to return my manager just happened to mention on the phone that I will only be paid for the hours I work. I checked in with HR yesterday and they say they have worked out an hourly rate from my contracted hours and yearly salary and that is how they will pay me by multiplying my worked hours.

 

Now I am not greedy and asking for a hand out but I didn't ask for reduced hours, this was agreed more offered on the phone call i mentioned earlier. To quote my manager " I wouldn't expect you to come back on full hours straight away"!

 

Can my employer reduce my salary in this way without putting it in writing and having my consent?

 

Also, I am under OH at the moment and I saw OH today and was told I will be staying on short hours until the business can provide me with a place to sit regularly as I get a lot of pain if I'm on my feet for to long and this was the reason why I had to go sick in the first place!

Link to post
Share on other sites

does it say anything in your contract or in the companies "return to work" proceedure about this policy/...if not then they have no right cutting down your hours or rate of pay without consulting you first, as this is a significant detraction from your original t&cs of employment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

does it say anything in your contract or in the companies "return to work" proceedure about this policy/...if not then they have no right cutting down your hours or rate of pay without consulting you first, as this is a significant detraction from your original t&cs of employment.

 

Hi and thanks for your reply pikachu, ive been a bit peed off with this today and told my manager that I do not consent to it and view it as a deduciton from my wage that they cannot take.

 

I'm not aware of a return to work procedure as such, I wil try and do some digging asap. My contract has no mention of deductions or reduced hours but it does have a clause that makes sure that I will not be paid extra should i do extra hours ontop of my contracted hours.

 

Tomorow i'm going to phone up ACAS and Community legal advice and see what they say......

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can my employer reduce my salary in this way without putting it in writing and having my consent?

 

This depends on what your contract states re your hours of work.

 

Please tell us exactly what the 'Hours of Work' clause in your SMT states.

 

Kind regards

 

Che

...................................................................... [FONT=Comic Sans MS]Please post on a thread before sending a PM. My opinion's are not expressed as agent or representative of The Consumer Action Group. Always seek professional advice from a qualified legal adviser before acting. If I have helped you please feel free to click on the black star.[/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS] I am sorry that work means I don't get into the Employment Forum as often as I would like these days, but nonetheless I'll try to pop in when I can.[/FONT] [FONT=Arial Black][FONT=Comic Sans MS][COLOR=Red]'Venceremos' :wink:[/COLOR][/FONT][/FONT]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you, in you or your doctor's opinion, fit to return to work full time? As you say the problem still exists I assume you arent ready to return full time yet?

 

In my and OH opinion I am fit to work provided that I have a place to sit regulary for short periods throughout the day. I am back onto full time hours next week as I have discussed this with my manager.

 

Basicly as long as I take it steady and dont push myself to hard I'm good to go!

Link to post
Share on other sites

This depends on what your contract states re your hours of work.

 

Please tell us exactly what the 'Hours of Work' clause in your SMT states.

 

Kind regards

 

Che

 

Hi and thanks for your question, this is the clause as requested from my Statement of Terms and Conditions of employment.

 

 

Normal working hours

  1. Your normal working hours are 11.5 hours per day working from 07.30 to 19.30, averaging a standard 40.25 hours per week. You may, however, be reqiured to work such other hours as the Comapany may deem necessary for the satisfactory completion of your duties.
  2. No additional payment will be made for any additional hours worked.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

I had a good read of my contract and below is my pay arangments, section 1 states You will be paid by 12 equal monthly installments so that will not occure this month surely a breach of contract?

 

But does section 3 constitute a written agreement meaning that they can deduct anything from me as they see fit? Thus rendering section 1 pointless!

 

 

 

 

Pay arrangments

  1. You will be paid by 12 equal monthly installments in arrears directly into your bank or building society account. Payments wil be credited on the 27th day of each month, or the nearest working day, except in December when the payment will normaly be paid earlier.
  2. Should the name of any Group comapny appear on your payslip or other document issued by the payroll department and such company is not the employing company specified above, then it does so for administrative reasons. For the avoidance of doubt you will continue to be employed by the company until you recieve notice to the contrary or your contract is terminated.
  3. For the purpose of the employment rights act 1996 your hereby authorise the company to deduct from your salary any sums which you may owe to the company including, without limitation, any loans made to you by the company.

 

Thanks in advance

 

W

Link to post
Share on other sites

i would have thought section 3 was more to the meaning of, if you leave the company and you have taken more hoildays than you were entitled to. that kind of thing. i had always thought if you were salary you got paid the same week / month in week / month out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I phoned Community Legal Advice today and qualified for free legal advice. They transferd me to a solicitor and it seems my employer has been a bit naughty and possible breached my contract to boot but I have to wait untill later in the week for a clearer picture.

 

I would advice anybody with employment issues to call the above people, they are pretty good!

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

Normal working hours

  1. Your normal working hours are 11.5 hours per day working from 07.30 to 19.30, averaging a standard 40.25 hours per week. You may, however, be reqiured to work such other hours as the Comapany may deem necessary for the satisfactory completion of your duties.
  2. No additional payment will be made for any additional hours worked.

Thus if you turn up, 'ready and willing' to work 40.25 hours per week, then in the absence of medical evidence to the contrary, if your employer fails to provide, and indeed pay for 40.25hrs per week, this is a clear BOC.

 

I'm glad you qualified for free legal help with one of CLA's employment specialists - you should get good advice from them, and I would hope they agreed with my opinion!

 

Che

...................................................................... [FONT=Comic Sans MS]Please post on a thread before sending a PM. My opinion's are not expressed as agent or representative of The Consumer Action Group. Always seek professional advice from a qualified legal adviser before acting. If I have helped you please feel free to click on the black star.[/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS] I am sorry that work means I don't get into the Employment Forum as often as I would like these days, but nonetheless I'll try to pop in when I can.[/FONT] [FONT=Arial Black][FONT=Comic Sans MS][COLOR=Red]'Venceremos' :wink:[/COLOR][/FONT][/FONT]

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...