Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
    • Here are 7 of our top tips to help you connect with young people who have left school or otherwise disengaged.View the full article
    • My defence was standard no paperwork:   1.The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2. Paragraph 1 is noted. The Defendant has had a contractual relationship with MBNA Limited in the past. The Defendant does not recognise the reference number provided by the claimant within its particulars and has sought verification from the claimant who is yet to comply with requests for further information. 3. Paragraph 2 is denied. The Defendant maintains that a default notice was never received. The Claimant is put to strict proof to that a default notice was issued by MBNA Limited and received by the Defendant. 4. Paragraph 3 is denied. The Defendant is unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served from either the Claimant or MBNA Limited. 5. On the 02/01/2023 the Defendant requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CCA 1974 Section 78 request. The claimant is yet to respond to this request. On the 19/05/2023 a CPR 31.14 request was sent to Kearns who is yet to respond. To date, 02/06/2023, no documentation has been received. The claimant remains in default of my section 78 request. 6. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of proof of assignment being sent/ agreement/ balance/ breach or termination requested by CPR 31.14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) show how the Defendant entered into an agreement; and (b) show and evidence the nature of breach and service of a default notice pursuant to Section 87(1) CCA1974 (c) show how the claimant has reached the amount claimed for; and (d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim; 7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 8. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974. 9. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
    • Monika the first four pages of the Private parking section have at least 12 of our members who have also been caught out on this scam site. That's around one quarter of all our current complaints. Usually we might expect two current complaints for the same park within 4 pages.  So you are in good company and have done well in appealing to McDonalds in an effort to resolve the matter without having  paid such a bunch of rogues. Most people blindly pay up. Met . Starbucks and McDonalds  are well aware of the situation and seem unwilling to make it easier for motorists to avoid getting caught. For instance, instead of photographing you, if they were honest and wanted you  to continue using their services again, they would have said "Excuse me but if you are going to go to Mc donalds from here, it will cost you £100." But no they kett quiet and are now pursuing you for probably a lot more than £100 now. They also know thst  they cannot charge anything over the amount stated on the car park signs. Their claims for £160 or £170 are unlawful yet so many pay that to avoid going to Court. When the truth is that Met are unlikely to take them to Court since they know they will lose. The PCNs are issued on airport land which is covered by Byelaws so only the driver can be pursued, not the keeper. But they keep writing to you as they do not know who was driving unless you gave it away when you appealed. Even if they know you were driving they should still lose in Court for several reasons. The reason we ask you to fill out our questionnaire is to help you if MET do decide to take you to Court in the end. Each member who visited the park may well have different experiences while there which can help when filling out a Witness statement [we will help you with that if it comes to it.] if you have thrown away the original PCN  and other paperwork you obviously haven't got a jerbil or a guinea pig as their paper makes great litter boxes for them.🙂 You can send an SAR to them to get all the information Met have on you to date. Though if you have been to several sites already, you may have done that by now. In the meantime, you will be being bombarded by illiterate debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors all threatening you with ever increasing amounts as well as being hung drawn and quartered. Their letters can all be safely ignored. On the odd chance that you may get a Letter of Claim from them just come back to us and we will get you to send a snotty letter back to them so that they know you are not happy, don't care a fig for their threats and will see them off in Court if they finally have the guts to carry on. If you do have the original PCN could you please post it up, carefully removing your name. address and car registration number but including dates and times. If not just click on the SAR to take you to the form to send to Met.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Minnimes -v Barclaycard


minnimes
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4109 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Minnimes,

 

Microfiche is where data was "photographed" and stored in teeny tiny format like photos but with many pages on one slide. They still use them to access old archive stuff like newspapers, Registry Office entries, etc.

 

BC are still way off producing an enforceable credit agreement. :)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 146
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

oh ok, so what now? the fos are done, they say its a valid agreement and wont/cant comment on enforceability, do i send them the letter you did for me that i sent for the other account? thank you and have a good christmas,

 

The FOS are an industry funded body and hence wont dare give an opinion on enforceability and by rights they shouldnt.. only a court can rule on it.

 

You now have a copy of the agreement and can see its unenforceable, its up to you how you want to play the next move? low f&f offer, no further payments etc etc. Barclays like other banks will never agree with you no matter what you send them.

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ive not been paying them anyway, not since it became in dispute. i dont have the means to do a f&f offer at the mo, so i guess my only option is to wait it out and see if they take me to court. i think i should send the letter slick did on my other thread ? strange though how ive been asking for an agreement for about 12 mnths, fos write to them once and get it.

:rolleyes::confused::rolleyes::confused:
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Minnimes,

 

This is why we've been telling CAGgers to try the FOS if they want to see the actual credit agreement - because it seems that the FOS ARE telling the banks to produce whatever documents they have.

 

But you must understand, the FOS are NOT saying the agreement is enforceable or not. They are simply saying the bank has fulfilled its' obligations set out in CCA1974.

 

As the Shadow says, it's only a court that can decide if an agreement is enforceable, although we can see that the document fails to meet the requirements.

 

You can send the letter I posted on your Solution Finance thread if you want. Or you can ignore them and see what happens. :)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 1 year later...

Its been a while, need some advice, ive heard nothing from this account until 2 weeks ago, i got a letter from barclays saying the account is being passed on, then letters from lowell, the account as far as im concerned is still in dispute. they have never sent me the credit agreement i requested. ive not responded to any letters yet. i have delt with lowell in the past re this account and stated it is in dispute, do i carry on ignoring or do i respnd and remind them its in dispute? thanks in advance x

:rolleyes::confused::rolleyes::confused:
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Minnimes,

 

To save me going back through the thread, can you please remind me, did you get anything back in response to your CCA request, like their T&C's.

 

I'm sure you're aware about changes in the last couple of years which mean they don't have to send the actual signed credit agreement but they can pursue the debt if they've sent you T&C's.

 

However, to take effective court action to recover any alleged debt, they should require the signed credit agreement.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes they did me a set of t&C, i dont even think i still have it, so even though i contacted them before the law changed they can still chase me under the new law? i wasnt aware it had changed, the paper work they sent me when i asked for my agreement are on this page, where do i go from here? i dont know where i stand now if the law has change, ty

:rolleyes::confused::rolleyes::confused:
Link to post
Share on other sites

The law hasn't exactly changed - more like cases have been decided that have set precedents about how similar cases should be treated.

 

I would continue to maintain that your a/c is in dispute as they've failed to send you proof of the credit agreement.

 

Then you'll see if they are prepared to take the case further without proof of the debt.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

just raise it again with them or send them a official complaint letter again to their headquaters. I think their are bit slow responding your letter. But all after u do is do it again and again raise the matter with them. At this moment i also have problems with bc. but i have a solicitor ringing me up on tuesday about them for discrimation (disable act)

Iaintw is a registered customer services official/profit Protection staff/supermarket worker and who deals with customers

Buying laptops with advice etc

ISP Moderator and chat room helper for chats

Aviationist and train advice

Credit references and bank helper advice

Loss Protection (civil recovery)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd write just to the DCA as that will take more time for them to get back to you.

 

See how they respond.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

barclays have sold the account to a dc and theyve sent me this claiming it to be a valid agreement, it has my signature on it but the agreement doesnt look right,could someone look at it and tell me where i go from here? i thought id heard the last of them as its been over a year.

:rolleyes::confused::rolleyes::confused:
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Minnimes - long time , no see!

 

What DCA has the a/c now.

 

The document is too small to see, so if you want us to see it properly, follow this guide - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?214191-HSBC-solicitors-northampton-claim-help-pls&p=3808613&viewfull=1#post3808613

 

This is clearly an application form and is not likely to qualify as a properly executed credit agreement.

 

If someone thought they had enough evidence to take court action successfully, I suspect they'd have done it by now. Waiting over a year to pursue has not helped their case at all.

 

:wink:

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi slick, been ages but fortunatly ive had no need to come here, its Lowell. the document is also on post #123, i read my thred and saw id already been sent it once. do i just tell them the account is still indispute and ask them to send me a propper agreement? thanks for the reply

:rolleyes::confused::rolleyes::confused:
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd drop Lowells a brief letter saying this is the same card application that you've been sent before. It wasn't a properly executed credit agreement then, and it still is not one now.

 

Accordingly, the a/c should not have been sold to Lowells, it remains in clear dispute and any demands for payment will be the subject of a formal complaint to the FOS.

 

:wink:

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

so ive had a reply. they maintain that it is an agreement, what do i do now?

 

this is what the email says.

 

Thank you for your recent correspondence.

 

 

 

Your comments have been noted and we can confirm that the documentation we have previously sent to you is sufficient.

 

 

 

This matter has previously been investigated and you have been informed of the response. We can no longer freeze your account and intend to pursue the balance with immediate effect. As such we cannot hold any phone calls or letters with regard to this account and ultimately this account could be passed to our litigation team who could consider appropriate legal action.

 

You are required to contact our company immediately to arrange repayment. We have a number of repayment options available and would be happy to tailor a repayment plan to your current financial circumstances.

 

We thank you for your time and understanding with regard to this matter and we look forward to hearing from you at the nearest opportunity.

 

 

 

Yours sincerely

 

 

 

 

 

Samantha Barnard

 

Customer Services

:rolleyes::confused::rolleyes::confused:
Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear sir or madam,

 

I refer to your letter of xxdate and, despite your assertions, the document supplied is merely an application form.

 

It does not constitute an enforceable credit agreement for many reasons and, because of this, the a/c should not have been sold to you as it was, and remains, in dispute.

 

If you make any demands in respect of this matter, a formal complaint will be made to the FOS without further warning.

 

Any court action which you may take will be vigorously defended using the relevant legislation set out in the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

:-D

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...