Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Charges as result of change to DD date


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5509 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My Direct Debit for Swiftcover normally comes out on the first of every month. This month (January) I received an email from them on the 7th to say they'd had problems with their direct debits at the beginning of the month and hadn't taken it and that they would be re-attempting it on the 12th.

 

Being a 6 week month for me, plus Xmas etc my account was slightly over the overdraft limit at this point - but I'd assumed at least all my bills had been paid.

 

Of course the Direct Debit has now failed, incurring bank charges. They've also said they're going to keep trying every couple of days.

 

I'm writing an email back to them to say there will not be enough funds until the 27th and I'll cancel the direct debit if they're going to keep trying to avoid further charges.

 

Can I claim the bank charges I've already incurred from Swiftcover seeing as they've effectively committed breach of contract by taking the money out on the wrong day?

 

I can't find any decent information on the Direct Debit laws to confirm this but I assume the DD agreement constitutes an agreement that the payment is taken on a certain date.

If you found this post useful please click on the scales above.

 

Egg - £400 - Prelim sent. On hold.

Mint - On the list Est £800

GE Capital - On the list (3 accounts!) Est £4000

 

MBNA - £545 Prelim sent 13/11/2006

LBA sent 1/12/2006

£350 partial payment received 18/12/2006.

Full settlement received 20/1/07

 

NatWest - Est £4000 not incl interest

Data Protection Act Sent 10/1/07

Statements received 24/1/07

Prelim sent 3/2/07

Full Settlement received 22/2/07

 

The contents of this post are the sole opinions of The Cornflake and not necessarily the opinions of any other members of this group. They do not constitute sound legal or financial advice and if in doubt you are advised to seek advice from a qualified professional

Link to post
Share on other sites

As they hadn't told you in advance, you probably have a good basis for recaliming the charges. Of course they will argue that you shojld have better accounting and you should realise how much is in your account.

 

However, if you are really prepared to go right ahead including suing, you are likley to win.

 

As usual, you need to get tough, set dealnes and stick to them.

 

this means that you write to them, give them 14 days to refund you the money or esle you sue. At the end of the 14 days, you do exactly that.

If you are not prepared to carry out your threat then don't bother.

Of course you could aslo claim the money from your bank whose chages will have been excessive. However, this is likley to be very long-winded because of the general stay on charges claims

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply. I am aware of the situation regarding bank charges have been a member here for quite a while now), I luckily reclaimed most charges before the test case started.

 

As I assumed all the bills had gone out when they were supposed to I think I have a good argument there, especially as they didn't notify me until the 7th and Direct Debits when due to go out on a non-working day are requested on the first previous working day which would have been the 31st December.

 

I'm trying to figure out if a Direct Debit agreement is a legally binding contract. If it is then I think I'm fine as the date of the payment is included in the agreement. Therefore it's a clear breach of contract and I can claim any costs incurred due to it.

 

I'm prepared to go through with the process - they're still sorting out a simple claim for me after 6 months when someone drove into my parked car. Not my favourite company at the moment.

If you found this post useful please click on the scales above.

 

Egg - £400 - Prelim sent. On hold.

Mint - On the list Est £800

GE Capital - On the list (3 accounts!) Est £4000

 

MBNA - £545 Prelim sent 13/11/2006

LBA sent 1/12/2006

£350 partial payment received 18/12/2006.

Full settlement received 20/1/07

 

NatWest - Est £4000 not incl interest

Data Protection Act Sent 10/1/07

Statements received 24/1/07

Prelim sent 3/2/07

Full Settlement received 22/2/07

 

The contents of this post are the sole opinions of The Cornflake and not necessarily the opinions of any other members of this group. They do not constitute sound legal or financial advice and if in doubt you are advised to seek advice from a qualified professional

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was thinking about this some more. My argument hinges on the date of payment being part of the 'contract'. Companies have to give 10 working days notice to change the date on an agreement, but I'm not sure how this works in a one-off case where they re-apply for the same payment.

 

If this is a breach of contract surely every time a company re-applies for a failed direct debit on a date other than the agreed one this would also be a breach of contract. Which obviously is quite a big thing if it is as they do this all the time.

 

EDIT: Additional info from the BACS website (source: Direct Debit help centre - incorrect payments) -

 

If a Direct Debit payment has been taken which is not in accordance with the advance notice received i.e. too much has been taken or the payment has been taken on the wrong date (the organistion must take the Direct Debit payment on or within three working days after the specified date as advised in the Advance Notice), you are entitled to an immediate refund of the amount debited from your bank under the Direct Debit Guarantee. Contact your bank in person at the branch, by phone or write to them

:confused:

Edited by thecornflake

If you found this post useful please click on the scales above.

 

Egg - £400 - Prelim sent. On hold.

Mint - On the list Est £800

GE Capital - On the list (3 accounts!) Est £4000

 

MBNA - £545 Prelim sent 13/11/2006

LBA sent 1/12/2006

£350 partial payment received 18/12/2006.

Full settlement received 20/1/07

 

NatWest - Est £4000 not incl interest

Data Protection Act Sent 10/1/07

Statements received 24/1/07

Prelim sent 3/2/07

Full Settlement received 22/2/07

 

The contents of this post are the sole opinions of The Cornflake and not necessarily the opinions of any other members of this group. They do not constitute sound legal or financial advice and if in doubt you are advised to seek advice from a qualified professional

Link to post
Share on other sites

The direct debit is not necessarily a binding agreement on its own. On the other hand it will be part of some larger agreement. If it says that the collection date is the 1st and if there has been a pattern of collection happening on that day then you will have no problem in saying that that collection date is incorporated into the contract

Link to post
Share on other sites

By the way, you should also check your credit file. You could easily find that they have logged the payment failure their too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

From what I understand there is a DD agreement with the bank to allow the payment to be taken on the set date. I know that if an error is made they have to refund it which backs up the argument that it definitely is a proper agreement.

 

There doesn't seem to be much information available on the legal side of DDs so I've emailed the Financial Ombudsman to find out what they think.

 

As companies regularly re-present DD payments when they fail there is potentially quite a large implication if I'm right - all re-presented direct debits would be covered and you would be able to claim for any charges resulting from these additional requests.

If you found this post useful please click on the scales above.

 

Egg - £400 - Prelim sent. On hold.

Mint - On the list Est £800

GE Capital - On the list (3 accounts!) Est £4000

 

MBNA - £545 Prelim sent 13/11/2006

LBA sent 1/12/2006

£350 partial payment received 18/12/2006.

Full settlement received 20/1/07

 

NatWest - Est £4000 not incl interest

Data Protection Act Sent 10/1/07

Statements received 24/1/07

Prelim sent 3/2/07

Full Settlement received 22/2/07

 

The contents of this post are the sole opinions of The Cornflake and not necessarily the opinions of any other members of this group. They do not constitute sound legal or financial advice and if in doubt you are advised to seek advice from a qualified professional

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update - Nothing yet received from the FO so I'm going to call them today. I need to know who is liable for the charges - Everything on the BACs site points to the bank being responsible.

 

REALLY need to know the legal status regarding DD agreements - I've been Googling but can't find anything useful.

 

Swiftcover have now re-presented the DD twice more, so it's up to £90 in charges, plus overdraft interest. Maximum notice they've given me is 5 working days.

 

I'm going to try and claim the money from them anyway and see what happens, as they've admitted it was their fault anyway that the DD date changed.

If you found this post useful please click on the scales above.

 

Egg - £400 - Prelim sent. On hold.

Mint - On the list Est £800

GE Capital - On the list (3 accounts!) Est £4000

 

MBNA - £545 Prelim sent 13/11/2006

LBA sent 1/12/2006

£350 partial payment received 18/12/2006.

Full settlement received 20/1/07

 

NatWest - Est £4000 not incl interest

Data Protection Act Sent 10/1/07

Statements received 24/1/07

Prelim sent 3/2/07

Full Settlement received 22/2/07

 

The contents of this post are the sole opinions of The Cornflake and not necessarily the opinions of any other members of this group. They do not constitute sound legal or financial advice and if in doubt you are advised to seek advice from a qualified professional

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

New Update -

 

The bank refunded the charges in the end as they decided it was an error that the first payment for the month was on the wrong date. Well pleased that the bank actually decided to be sensible in this case.:D

 

Swiftcover sent me a copy of the Direct Debit Agreement, stating it as evidence that the notice period is only three working days. It is three working days because they have tippexed out the original number and written 3 over the top.

 

 

Have forwarded this on to the OFT for investigation - they are very concerned that Swiftcover have deliberately changed a standard Direct Debit agreement.

 

Also they complained because I sent them an email late at night and as the person has a Blackberry it woke them up.

 

Must....not....instigate....evil....plan......:p

If you found this post useful please click on the scales above.

 

Egg - £400 - Prelim sent. On hold.

Mint - On the list Est £800

GE Capital - On the list (3 accounts!) Est £4000

 

MBNA - £545 Prelim sent 13/11/2006

LBA sent 1/12/2006

£350 partial payment received 18/12/2006.

Full settlement received 20/1/07

 

NatWest - Est £4000 not incl interest

Data Protection Act Sent 10/1/07

Statements received 24/1/07

Prelim sent 3/2/07

Full Settlement received 22/2/07

 

The contents of this post are the sole opinions of The Cornflake and not necessarily the opinions of any other members of this group. They do not constitute sound legal or financial advice and if in doubt you are advised to seek advice from a qualified professional

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Direct Debit Guarantee

  • If the amounts to be paid or the payment dates change, the organisation collecting the payment will notify you normally 10 working days in advance of your account being debited or as otherwise agreed
  • If an error is made by the organisation or your bank or building society, you are guaranteed a full and immediate refund from your branch of the amount paid
  • You can cancel a Direct Debit at any time by contacting your bank or building society. We also recommend you notify the organisation concerned

from bacs itself.

 

Direct Debit - your rights

 

Ida x

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...