Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Can my employer visit me at home without notice.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5583 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am currently off sick with severe depression. My manager came to visit me today without giving any notice at all, they just turned up at my address.

Are they allowed to do this or do they have to give me some warning?

 

Any help would be appreciated. I am part of a union but I think this may have been an issue that was overlooked as opposed to a deliberate breach of employment law if the above is the case. Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am currently off sick with severe depression. My manager came to visit me today without giving any notice at all, they just turned up at my address.

Are they allowed to do this or do they have to give me some warning?

 

Any help would be appreciated. I am part of a union but I think this may have been an issue that was overlooked as opposed to a deliberate breach of employment law if the above is the case. Thanks in advance.

 

Hi, I hope you ok. Im no expert but have been in managment for a little while. Im sure that if you have made your employer aware that you are off work for mental health reasons there is no way they should call round to see you without notice as this could do more harm than good. However that said, could it be that you boss was genuinly concernd??

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep i'd go with concern esp if you live on your own & they may have tried but got no response via other methods.

 

i say this only in relation to current news events [nurse in boot?]

 

what are your real issues here? i dont think you actually mind them doing it, but are p'haps worried about 'what' it might imply/lead too?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is also the new trend of employers wanting to keep a regular contact with employees who are absent. Employers view it as a way to make the employee feel valued and missed but I suppose if your not in a happy frame of mind you may feel your are being harrased.

 

Maybe its worth just finding out what your employers absence policy is and go form there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is considered perfectly acceptable to visit an employee at home and is standard advice as a part of any policy to manage long-term sickness absence (as are letters, e mails and phone calls). It would however be good practice to give some advance notice of a visit, and in certain circumstances (for example if your condition had been caused by the person making the visit) it could be counter productive.

 

Employers need to have policies in place to manage sickness absence and in the case of long-term absence it is normal to maintain contact with the employee to keep you up to date with what is happening at work perhaps, or to explore ways in which your return might be made easier. It wouldn't be considered harassment in the first instance unless you had made it clear that you were unhappy to receive a home visit - after all, why wouuld it be unacceptable for a caring employer (if that is how they wish to be perceived) to want to come and see you to find out how you are?

 

What was the nature of the visit anyway? Were you put under any undue pressure? I would be a little careful in refusing visits outright (unless there is a clear problem with the employer being the root of the problem) as the employer may then feel that you have something to hide.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Talisman,

 

sorry to hear you are not well and do hope you are on the road to recovery. Certainly the unexpected visit could irritate your health.

 

It is common place for any employer these days, to look after the welfare of the employee and as such if you are covered by a medical certificate, your manager or HR should arrange how this contact will be made i.e. phone.

 

If a "home" visit is necessary, then out of courtesy or protocol, your manager or HR should contact you in the 1st instance to make sure it is convenient for you, you are comfortable with the arrangement being proposed and from a legal perspective you are entitled to representation, which they have failed to give you notice to arrange. You may have wanted someone present i.e. union rep, friend etc, which is your right. You may not have wanted the visit at your home and there is no reason why it could not have been arranged to take place somewhere neutral i.e. coffee shop. This can be part of your rehabilitation, as could any other activity, so don't fret about being seen out of your home.

 

As SW quite rightly says, if the person who called on you was / is part of the equasion to your condition, this could lead to a set back.

 

Have you got any burning issues with the home visit, other than you were not consulted?

 

Findout what your employers protocol is for long term sickness and post back up what your findings are. ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...