Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have received a PCN from Euro Car Parks for MFG - Esso Cobham - Gravesend. I was completely unaware that there was any such limit for parking and always considered this to be a service station. I stopped there to use the toilet, have a coffee and made a couple of work calls. I have read the previous topics on this location which suggest I can ignore this and ECP will not take legal action. The one possible complication is that the vehicle is leased by my employer so I do not want to involve them with the associated reminders and threatening letters. The PCN was first issued to the leasing company Arval who have notified ECP of the hiring company. I have attached a copy of the PCN Notice to Hirer with details removed as per instructions. What options do I have or should I just pay the PCN promptly at the reduced rate of £60? img20240424_23142631.pdf
    • What you have uploaded is a letter with daft empty threats from third-party paper tigers.  Just ignore it. What we need to see is the original invoice you received last October or November.
    • Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Marital seperation - Joint mortgage


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5581 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

 

I am turning once again to you guys for help, although this time it is for a family member.

 

The situation is that an inlaw recently seperated from her husband of about 6yrs. They lived in a nice detached house and had a joint mortgage in both of their names. When they split, she moved into a rented property with her daughters, untill their house sold. The problem is, that the husband will not lower the price of the house, and it is not selling. It has been up for sale now for about a year.

 

The problem with this, is that he is not paying the mortgage on it (or is not paying it all - She has been receiving letters from the mortgage company). Apparently it is not far enough into arrears to warrant repossession, but she has been told by the mortgage company that she needs to pay £1600 within the next week.

 

 

As far as I understand, BOTH owners need to agree on a price to sell the house. He refuses to do this and has told her that he will "take her down with him" (His exact words).

 

Being a single mum with young children, she cannot afford to go through a solicitor.

 

Can anybody suggest information or advice that I might be able to pass on to help her out?

 

Thanks in advance,

Wayne

Link to post
Share on other sites

She should get an initial consultation with a solicitor for free - chose a specialist in family law.

 

May be important as why should she be reponsible for all the extra arrears and interest charges.?

 

Mediation would be a good idea - for the sake of the children.

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

The children are from a previous marriage so they do not factor into it.

 

She is planning a divorce, this year. I'm just a little astounded that the law would allow someone to become blacklisted in this kind of situation. She doesn't pay the mortage anymore because she doesn't live there and needs all of her earnings to put a roof over their heads.

Link to post
Share on other sites

unfortunately whatever the circumstances if it is a joint mortgage - she is jointly responsible for the payments - unless she can persuade her husband to buy her share ( if there is any equity?)

 

Her husband is not just punishing her but himself as well as there will be interest and charges accruing on the debt and if the lender takes possession he will have no control on the sale price - and the mortgage company can try and reclaim any shortfall for 12 years afterwards.

 

Has she had any contact with a solicitor ? If there is very little equity in the house maybe she may be just as well to consider letting him have the house and just getting away from all the hassle?

 

It all depends on equity /personal circumstances etc - but sometimes you have to consider playing the game and letting the other person think they are getting the upper hand - so to speak.

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I guess her credit file will have already been affected by the mortgage arrears - so she should really try and sort this out ASAP. Then hopefully it will show it as being settled if and when her name is removed from the mortgage.She can check her credit file for a small nominal fee to check

 

But it will be better than having a possession against her name - and his for that matter.

 

I still think it would be worth her having an initial free consultation with a family law solicitor - for the sake of a couple of letters it may be an answer and she can try mediaition if they suggest that and then go from there.

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having spoken to her, it sounds like that is what she wants to do (Get out and let him have the house). This will save her being blacklisted, correct?

 

The mortgage company would have to agree to her coming off the mortgage and it is unlikely if there is arrears.

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Be very careful - this is exactly what happened to me in 2005. Partner had mental illness for 4 years, I couldn't take it anymore,it was making me ill, so i sadly decided to leave (house jointly owned, I put down the deposit by selling my flat which was free of mortgage, and I made every blessed mortgage payment for 7 years).

 

I had an agreement with him that the house would be sold and that if he was unavailable for viewings I would do it. However, he was extremely bitter and twisted and refused to let anyone in. When I tried to gain access he kept the key on the inside so I couldn't get in, he called the police to me one day when i was in the street waiting for a prospective buyer to turn up, they made me go away, and then to ensure i stayed away, he applied for an ex-parte hearing, and got an injunction with power of arrest, to keep me out as I had been violent towards him! This only lasted a week, as you get a return hearing, the judge (who I knew) wiped it out and was very cross with him.

 

Everytime I tried to help us, he went to a solicitor, he was getting legal aid, I had to pay.

 

In the end I'm afraid I just gave up, walked away and let it be repossessed.

 

See a solicitor quickly, I believe you can get an order for sale.

 

Good luck but really, don't let bricks, mortar and money wear you donw to the point you become mentally ill - its not worth it, and once I had accepted what had happened, the weight off my shoulders - well i can't tell you how good that felt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hhhmm, sounds exactly like her situation. He has been diagnosed with various mental illnesses, and had tried to kill himself various times. She couldn't cope with it anymore so thats why she decided to split. Now ofcourse (as you said too) he is bitter and wants to cause as much damage to her life as he can. He even key'd the side of her car on new years eve :(

 

Could you expand on what an "order for sale" is?

 

Thanks for everyones input on this, we appreciate it :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe (always the case you find out after the event!) that when a stalemate is reached like this that one or other party can apply to the court to make an order for sale. I don't know how, why or where, but I am sure if you were to PM one of the helpers on here they would be able to answer this. I'm going to do a quick google and see what comes up.

 

There is of course always the injunction route, but I would always advise a solicitor to help you with this - they can get complicated, nasty and downright expensive. All depends on what you want to gain from the situation.

 

I know that letting the house go probably saved my sanity, which is why I recommend it in cases like this - some things in life are more important - however, this doesn't do for everybody and each case should be judged on its merits.

 

Lets see what old google comes up with and I'll try and paste it up on here.

 

And, I've now had another thought - children involved here? Divorce solicitor? Should be able to have him out, her in, until the last child finishes further education. All at his expense hopefully, but this really does need a solicitor, and by the time the last child is 18/19 whatever, maybe, just maybe, this couple will be talking again, old battles will be a thing of the past, and together they MAY be able to go forward with the property and a sensible and fair solution.

 

You must double check anything i tell you, I deal with social housing and all the problems that brings, it is a good 4 years now since i did homelessness and this sort of thing - I'm basically right, but the laws in these areas change often and I may be slightly out of date.

 

Lets go and have a google and I'll come back as soon as i have something.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats partly why I suggested the free initial consultation with a solicitor.

 

My sister was told she could force her partner to sell so she could get her share.

 

In the end we persuaded him he would be better off buying her out and she agreed an offer (pretending to be reluctant)

 

As prices have gone down and my sister has the cash and he has a big mortgage guess whos laughing now.

 

But at the time he thought he was the winner - and that was the trick.

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all your help. I passed on the advice and she found a solicitor who is willing to take a look at the situation and hopefully advise.

 

She is on working tax credits so some turned her away saying that they dont do legal aid. She also got turned away from 3 in our local area due to "conflict of interests", i presume he is registered with these so they are not willing to take on a case against the guy.

 

Again, thanks :) fingers crossed for good news for her.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...