Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Studio, Shop Direct & Lowells


Casualty
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5594 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

Hope some one on here can offer me some help and advice.

I recently opened a joint bank account with someone from work as we brought a house together to rent out. Anyway shortly after the bank account was opened she started receiving letters addressed to me from Lowells chasing debits owing to STUDIO (£225) and SHOP DIRECT FINANCIAL SERVICES (£330).

I have checked my credit reference file with creditexpert and I now have two defaults on my file from the companies above. The accounts have been opened in Nov 07 and Feb 08 from an address I used to live at (shared accommodation) when I was a student back in 2001. Credit expert have put a notice of dispute on my file and contacted the companies involved – however no word from them as yet.

I have reported the matter to the police, however they say that it’s up to the company to report the fraud as they are the ones with the loss, and will not be investigating further.

I have written to Studio, Shop Direct and Lowells explaining that I’m not responsible for the debt, however Lowells keep sending letters to my colleague’s home demanding payment.

How do I get this matter resolved as no one appears interested in the truth.

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

What did you write to Lowells?

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I wrote to them and said that I felt that I had been a victim of Identity Theft and I had reported the matter to the police.

 

I also told them that I had not lived at the address the credit was applied for from 2001 and that my credit report showed that the DOB on both credit applications was not mine (it was different on each of the 2 applications).

 

I asked them to remove the entry from my credit file and address any future correspondence to the address I now lived at, rather than my work mates address.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Casualty

 

Sorry to here you have been the victim of identy fraud. It is not very nice cause trust me i know how u feel.

 

Now i think i can help u regarding this as it has happened to me and this is what i did. I will give u a bit of backround info first.

 

l moved out of a property in 2001 very quickly, basically overnite, due to a problem with a local drug addict who use to live at the property.

 

After i moved out his partner and him moved in, i got a call from a police officer who had not been made aware of my move checking i was ok as neighbour had seen him hanging around and called police who had them down as squatting at residence. At first i thought nothing of it i had only been there for 6 months endless problems nothing registered at addy except electric which was a PPM so when it ran out that was it.

 

Moved to a property locally a few years later then had a few props with credit but though nothing of it had split with a partner and thought that might be that cause not on electrol role at new place.

 

Well about May 07 i got my CR from experian and equifax.

This studio account was on it new nothing about it it had deafulted in the dec of 2002 and looked at the addy low and behold it was the flat i had overnite left. I had been away so it took about 13 days b4 i got it. Next day a letter from moorcroft landed on door mat. I rang them and explained the guy did not care told me i was still responsible for the debt i informed them i was going to police and would ring in with crime number, he did not care just said would not get u out of paying your debt.

 

Rang back spoke to a lovely lady and low and behold even tho she was sympathic said i would still need to pay debt spoke to supervisor and said the same.

 

Wrote to them advising i was not paying for a debt that was not mine and provided the CRN in writing got a template were looking ino ur complain blah blah blah.

 

As far as i was concerned it was taking to long 3 weeks had passed since the looking into complaint letter and nowt. So i rang studio and spoke to the relivant depo. She said oh have not had anything registered from moorcroft re this can u send a copy of all the stuff u sent Moorcroft i explained i had other docs to prove my case and she asked for copys if i can supply them once i had explained the situation.

 

They went off to them and one chasing phone call later the account was dropped Moorcroft sent a appology and everything gone off CRF.

 

My best piece of advise is ring the original creditors, studio and shop direct, and speak to fraud investigation depo they will soon help u and should take the acc back from the DCA.

Edited by The GodMother
spelling

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If for any reason you don't get their fraud investigation depts to help you then remember that you can always make complaints to Trading Standards and the OFT as well as the FOS and your local MP.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well i have never had to make a fraud investigation complaint to the relavant authorities or threaten to do so as they have always been quick enough to take the case but also u may want to use the line i like.

 

Turn your phone slightly away from your ear but make sure that it is still pickupable by them and say darling can u get me my address book as i need claires number you know the one which works for the BBC.

 

All thought my media contacts are not called claire i always use a name that they can turn round and say is common enought to not be able to ring the bbc and trace. How many claire that work for the bbc do u think there are or even another common name of the same effect.

 

If you dont have a partner or they are not there pretend to be looking about for your address book to find claires number say quietly but not to quietly god i wish i new where i put my phone book cause i need claires bbc number.

Just always make sure they can hear it as that will make them pick up the pace as they will not want bad publicity.

 

This even works for the contacts at your local and national newspapers. The is defo gonna be a claire/rob/paul that works for the daily mail or even some repected newspaper.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...