Jump to content
  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have a section 75 I started on the same day as the MCOL. You might think it strange to do both but I have zero faith in my bank, Santander take 3 months to process a S75 and so far rejected two other claims due to a force majeure clause, something the EU and UK government have said the pandemic is not. Both these claims are now with the FOS but the ombudsman's is currently working to a 4 month delay.   I really take another case taking 7 months to conclude, it's soul destroying.
    • Have you called the credit card company and tried to initiate a charge back?
    • Hi dx, thanks for your response.   they haven't touched my credit file actually and I have all receipts and a proof from the buyer (screenshot of bank statement). They asked to see a V5C and I told them that I don't have it, this is the bone of contention. They have now closed the account but still refuse to issue a check for my balance. 
    • After seemingly purchasing groceries online via tesco.com I arrived at the click and collect point to find the cost of the goods had increased by 15%.   Price offered at checkout £150, price charged on collection of goods £172.50.   Customer service decline to refund the difference and insist what was indicated at the time of purchase was a "guide price", I maintain had this been obvious I would have made a difference transactional decision.   References to the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations Act 2008 seem to be unpursuasive.   Perhaps someone else has a similar experience or knows a more effective lever?
    • Hi all, Hope someone can assist me as I feel a bit out of my depth.   Sorry for a long post in advance, it's probably best to set the scene as full as possible. We purchased 2 flights to Canada and returning to the UK from San Diego, the flights were with American Airlines (operated by BA) but importantly, booked through a travel agent budgetAir.co.uk on 9th January 2020.   BudgetAir’s first failure was to inform us that part of the flight was cancelled but after we discovered this from the airline and drew it to their attention, there were no suitable alternatives available so they agreed to refund the cost on 20th August.   EU law says they have to refund me within 7 days of a cancellation but obviously with the pandemic and they having to get the money back from the airline it’s reasonable to wait longer. The problem here is they keep telling me to be patient but American Airlines keep telling me that nobody has asked for a refund yet. Just for clarification I keep asking American Airlines as other people in a group I belong to have been waiting since February/March with no refunds.   On 26th September I sent BudgetAir a “notice before action” giving them 7 days to either refund me or for us to agree a mutually agreeable future date for a refund. On 5th October I started a MCOL which was issued the following day on 6th October. On 26th October I requested a default judgement which was issued today 18th October.   Two things concern me: 1, BudgetAir are a part of Travix International B.V in Amsterdam, BudgetAir are not listed as a Limited company in the UK, BudgetAir.co.uk is a trading name of Travix International B.V they use in the United Kingdom. This is the only UK address they provide anywhere on their documentation, this also explains a little more of the company structure: https://www.budgetair.co.uk/about I’m concerned I have used the right company name on the MCOL but it’s the only name they trade with I the UK.   2, My second concern is the address, I believe the London address may be no more than a postal address and will not give high court bailiffs any ability to recover goods. With the above thoughts, I don’t know how to proceed now I have got a judgement, assuming they don’t pay. My only option could be a 'third-party debt order' but I don’t know how to get any bank details, I paid my credit card and have no information (nor can I find online) about their banks.   Any thoughts would be gratefully received, Many thanks Anthony.
  • Our picks

    • Hermes lost parcel.. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422615-hermes-lost-parcel/
      • 49 replies
    • Oven repair. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/427690-oven-repair/&do=findComment&comment=5073391
      • 49 replies
    • I came across this discussion recently and just wanted to give my experience of A Shade Greener that may help others regarding their boiler finance agreement.
       
      We had a 10yr  finance contract for a boiler fitted July 2015.
       
      After a summer of discontent with ASG I discovered that if you have paid HALF the agreement or more you can legally return the boiler to them at no cost to yourself. I've just returned mine the feeling is liberating.
       
      It all started mid summer during lockdown when they refused to service our boiler because we didn't have a loft ladder or flooring installed despite the fact AS installed the boiler. and had previosuly serviced it without issue for 4yrs. After consulting with an independent installer I was informed that if this was the case then ASG had breached building regulations,  this was duly reported to Gas Safe to investigate and even then ASG refused to accept blame and repeatedly said it was my problem. Anyway Gas Safe found them in breach of building regs and a compromise was reached.
       
      A month later and ASG attended to service our boiler but in the process left the boiler unusuable as it kept losing pressure not to mention they had damaged the filling loop in the process which they said was my responsibilty not theres and would charge me to repair, so generous of them! Soon after reporting the fault I got a letter stating it was time we arranged a powerflush on our heating system which they make you do after 5 years even though there's nothing in the contract that states this. Coincidence?
       
      After a few heated exchanges with ASG (pardon the pun) I decided to pull the plug and cancel our agreement.
       
      The boiler was removed and replaced by a reputable installer,  and the old boiler was returned to ASG thus ending our contract with them. What's mad is I saved in excess of £1000 in the long run and got a new boiler with a brand new 12yr warranty. 
       
      You only have to look at TrustPilot to get an idea of what this company is like.
       
        • Thanks
      • 3 replies
    • Dazza a few months ago I discovered a good friend of mine who had ten debts with cards and catalogues which he was slavishly paying off at detriment to his own family quality of life, and I mean hardship, not just absence of second holidays or flat screen TV's.
       
      I wrote to all his creditors asking for supporting documents and not one could provide any material that would allow them to enforce the debt.
       
      As a result he stopped paying and they have been unable to do anything, one even admitted it was unenforceable.
       
      If circumstances have got to the point where you are finding it unmanageable you must ask yourself why you feel the need to pay.  I guarantee you that these companies have built bad debt into their business model and no one over there is losing any sleep over your debt to them!  They will see you as a victim and cash cow and they will be reluctant to discuss final offers, only ways to keep you paying with threats of court action or seizing your assets if you have any.
       
      They are not your friends and you owe them no loyalty or moral duty, that must remain only for yourself and your family.
       
      If it was me I would send them all a CCA request.   I would bet that not one will provide the correct response and you can quite legally stop paying them until such time as they do provide a response.   Even when they do you should check back here as they mostly send dodgy photo copies or generic rubbish that has no connection with your supposed debt.
       
      The money you are paying them should, as far as you are able, be put to a savings account for yourself and as a means of paying of one of these fleecers should they ever manage to get to to the point of a successful court judgement.  After six years they will not be able to start court action and that money will then become yours.
       
      They will of course pursue you for the funds and pass your file around various departments of their business and out to third parties.
       
      Your response is that you should treat it as a hobby.  I have numerous files of correspondence each faithfully organised showing the various letters from different DCA;s , solicitors etc with a mix of threats, inducements and offers.   It is like my stamp collection and I show it to anyone who is interested!
        • Thanks
        • Like

Appeal Against Pcn Turned Down Help?


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 4328 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi

i previously put up a thread and cannot trace it now? i was adviced to appeal against my PCN and did so and have attached the appeal letter. I have just recieved the letter of refusal and will down load it later today (have to scan at library). Is it worth appealling again? Single parent student nurse with no pennies at the moment so dont know what to do??

Have attached a copy of the letter i sent with this thread.

 

Ting helped witht he last thread not sure if you have anymore advice this time?

 

many thanks

Corcorans1

 

 

 

LETTER THAT I SENT.....................

 

I am appealing against the fine you issued (date) on technical errors.

 

1 You failed to inform me of the period in which I may make representations. For this particular legislation LLA & TFL Act 2003 the deadline is 28 days beginning with the date on which the notice was served. (the date I received it).

 

As you have failed to tell me this it is prejudicial since I believed as you stated, that the deadline was the same 28 period that you described, which is beginning date of this notice. (A shorter period).

 

2 You also say DO NOT PASS TO THE DRIVER and goes on to say that only the owner may make representations.

This is not strictly true. a) anyone may make representations on my behalf with my permission. The owner is only liable for payment of any resultant penalty. b) A recipient of such a PCN may not have been the driver, in my view, you obstruct my ability to formulate as appeal by appearing to suggest I may not consult the drive about the circumstances or elect them to make representations. This is also prejudicial.

 

When the PCN fails to comply with the law like you have done and failed to fully advise me of your legal position then it is technically invalid and unenforceable.

 

 

I await your reply

Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi

i previously put up a thread and cannot trace it now? i was adviced to appeal against my PCN and did so and have attached the appeal letter. I have just recieved the letter of refusal and will down load it later today (have to scan at library). Is it worth appealling again? Single parent student nurse with no pennies at the moment so dont know what to do??

Have attached a copy of the letter i sent with this thread.

 

Ting helped witht he last thread not sure if you have anymore advice this time?

 

many thanks

Corcorans1

 

 

 

LETTER THAT I SENT.....................

 

I am appealing against the fine you issued (date) on technical errors.

 

1 You failed to inform me of the period in which I may make representations. For this particular legislation LLA & TFL Act 2003 the deadline is 28 days beginning with the date on which the notice was served. (the date I received it).

 

As you have failed to tell me this it is prejudicial since I believed as you stated, that the deadline was the same 28 period that you described, which is beginning date of this notice. (A shorter period).

 

2 You also say DO NOT PASS TO THE DRIVER and goes on to say that only the owner may make representations.

This is not strictly true. a) anyone may make representations on my behalf with my permission. The owner is only liable for payment of any resultant penalty. b) A recipient of such a PCN may not have been the driver, in my view, you obstruct my ability to formulate as appeal by appearing to suggest I may not consult the drive about the circumstances or elect them to make representations. This is also prejudicial.

 

When the PCN fails to comply with the law like you have done and failed to fully advise me of your legal position then it is technically invalid and unenforceable.

 

 

I await your reply

 

Representations against penalty charge notice

 

1 (1) Where it appears to a person on whom a penalty charge notice has been served under section 4 (Penalty charges for road traffic contraventions) of this Act (in this Schedule referred to as “the recipient”) that one or other of the grounds mentioned in sub-paragraph (4) below is satisfied, he may make representations to that effect to the enforcing authority.

 

The enforcement authority may accept reps from a 3rd party but they have no legal right to make reps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't worry - councils will rarely just back down on legal wording errors (they'd be admitting EVERY ticket issued is wrong).

 

Wait for the NtO and appeal again.

 

Some councils only back down if you apply for Adjudication.

 

I'm glad you've put this in though:

 

2 You also say DO NOT PASS TO THE DRIVER and goes on to say that only the owner may make representations.

This is not strictly true. a) anyone may make representations on my behalf with my permission. The owner is only liable for payment of any resultant penalty. b) A recipient of such a PCN may not have been the driver, in my view, you obstruct my ability to formulate as appeal by appearing to suggest I may not consult the drive about the circumstances or elect them to make representations. This is also prejudicial.

 

I think this is an excellent example of prejudicing your ability to appeal through giving false information. I've just never seen anyone appeal on it yet, so I'd be interested to see how it will go.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I think this is an excellent example of prejudicing your ability to appeal through giving false information. I've just never seen anyone appeal on it yet, so I'd be interested to see how it will go.

 

Its not false its correct which is probably why no one has won an appeal on it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Everyone,

thanks for comments have put up my refusal of appeal as you can see its dated 11th December but i only recieved it on 2oth Dec. hardly time enough to appeal but will email them and tell them that i am appealling.

Does anyone know if i still get the discounted rate whilst appealling? it was the case first time around.

thanks

corcorans 1

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...