Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
    • The streaming giant also said it added 9.3 million subscribers in the first three months of the year.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Why is no one claiming the contractual rate of interest???


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4769 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

It is a mystery to me that no one seems to be interest in following this route.

To me it seems clear, straightforward and thoroughly ahievable.

 

Better than that, it is "fair and reasonable" to quote a much used bank phrase.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/18288-whats-your-time-worth.html#post142053

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi Bankfodder

 

I have reached stage two with Capital One and I will probably soon have to bring a small claim to court. I find claiming the contractual rate of interest confusing. Does the interest being claimed apply only to the period in which you initiate a small claim?

 

While I'm here could I pick your brains on something that puzzles me? Is there a '6 year rule' regarding claims for refunded charges? The reason I ask is that I recently received Halifax statements that go back 6 years 6 months and the extra six months charges increase the default charges substantially!!

 

Anthony

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bankfodder - interesting post.

 

I'm just at MCOL stage with the Halifax, 14 days up but just waiting for a new £39 charge to show up on my online statements before i press the button. The account in question does not offer an overdraft but charges a whopping 29.8% on unauthorised borrowing. Does this mean I should be charging at that rate for all the charges I've had (£1659 going back to 2001)? How would I go about changing the formula in the spreadsheet to reflect this rate?

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi B/F i'm just about to send my prelim and and i'm going to be charging the contractual rate of 16.9%, don't really feel confident enough to go the the higher(extortionate) rate but my B/Fs going for the high one but how do we work out this higher one with the open office spreadsheet?

cheers Carrie

OK I GIVE IN

 

Halifax £3600 charges, won with C/I £6400

 

NatWest S.A.R-05/06/06

Bug**r all recieved 03/11/06

Prelim guesimate sent for £3000 03/11/06

Cr*p one CONNED statements 08/06 ROFLMAO

Cr*p one charges=£976

con int 34.9% £1,003.75 £1,979.75.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi BF, and all interested (like... everyone?).

 

The original simple spreadsheet was not set up to easily change the rate of interest. With the complex spreadsheet at the moment, all you can do is change the 8% for a contractual rate, and this one rate will apply for the whole of the period. This is mentioned in the notes of the spreadsheet.

 

There is an arguement that as the rates have changed over time, the contractual rate claimed should reflect this. I am currently looking into this. If it would be correct to alter the rate over time, then I can create a template that would do this quite easily.

 

I am working on spreadsheets today, and will be able to spend quite sometime doing so over the next couple of weeks, so hopefully we can clear up a lot of these points very shortly.

 

I will put a suggestive element into every update of the spreadsheets for the contractual rate from now on, and hopefully more people will take this arguement up, as it is possible many people are unaware.

 

Look out folks for updates and good luck with your claims.

Vamp. x

  • Haha 1

[

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanx Vamp

OK I GIVE IN

 

Halifax £3600 charges, won with C/I £6400

 

NatWest S.A.R-05/06/06

Bug**r all recieved 03/11/06

Prelim guesimate sent for £3000 03/11/06

Cr*p one CONNED statements 08/06 ROFLMAO

Cr*p one charges=£976

con int 34.9% £1,003.75 £1,979.75.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll surely be amongst those claiming the higher rate of interest. Nice one Vamp.

Capital One Data Protection Act sent (15th December, 2008)

 

Barclaycard Data Protection Act sent (15th December, 2008)

 

Lloyds TSB Data Protection Act sent on three accounts - Current, Business & Credit Card (15th December, 2008)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Vampiress/Bankfodder,

 

I did claim the contractual rate of interest with all my credit card cases and I set up a spreadsheet to take care of the varying element of interest over different periods of time.

 

If this is of any use to you I can email it to you,

 

Baz.

Halifax - Won £425.00

American Express - Won £90.00

Woolwich Bank - Won £2280.00

Barclaycard - Won £558.00

Woolwich Bank - New claim for £723.00 entered.

Barclaycard - New claim for £236.00 entered

Link to post
Share on other sites

Vampiress/Bankfodder,

 

I did claim the contractual rate of interest with all my credit card cases and I set up a spreadsheet to take care of the varying element of interest over different periods of time.

 

If this is of any qse to you I can email it to you,

 

Baz.

Whoppeeeee. Oh please please send it to me. [email protected] I've already created a credit card one that would be easily amended (Excel only so far), but would be very very interested to see yours.

 

If anyone else has any templates they wish to offer, feel free to send them too.

 

We will also need to collate data in regard to the contractual interest rates used by the banks over the last 6 years at least. Feel free to send me any of this info too.

 

If you do send me anything, please make a clear note in the email of what it is I'm looking at, and also your CAG name, so I can find you.

 

Thankyou.:D

[

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Vampiress

I posted this question a little while ago - Do you know why is the last six years of charges so significant - is that a 'time issue' or a legal thingy (sorry I'm not very good with legal stuff)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Beyond 6 years the banks can claim statute of limitation. There are arguements against them being able to do this but it's complicated and tricky. You will have to do a fair amount of research. Use the search tool with the words "statute of limitation" and you should find a lot of information that way.

[

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys-

 

I have never been able to get any of the BAG spreadsheets to work on my computer-

So if anyone has one that is compatible with Microsoft word or works, I would be over the MOON to receive it.

 

Regarding claiming the contractual rate of interest or in the alternative the CCA rate of 8%

 

I think that a lot of members are really confused by this! and...

I believe that people are confusing it with the actual interest that was charged in relation to each fine that was levied, on each fine date

 

Please bear in mind that I have never been able to get a BAG spreadsheet to work on my PC. I calculated my interest by looking at each fine, the interest rate that was applied to each fine, the percentage rate of interest that was charged on a daily rate and worked it all out that way....very laborious!!!

 

Therefore I then had the amount leveid in fines, plus the actual amount that was levied upon those fines in interest, from the date of each fine, up to the date of issuing my claim

 

Of course, we all know that one can then add the County Courts Act rate of interest which is 8% as well, but one should really add the contractual rate of interest, the rate that a Bank would charge a consumer - this could be 16.9% or higher.

 

Bankfodder, I actually did claim the contractual rate of interest or in the alternative the CCA rate of 8% on my particulars of claim wwhen I issued my claim against Morgan Stanley. However, what I failed to do was to write both amounts on the claim form. I factually just put down the 8% amount, when I should have written both, the 16.9% rate and the or in the alternative 8% rate and when I discovered my error, the day before submitting my AQ, it was really too late to change it:(

 

Of course, I am wiser now but perhaps you or another mod. could make the situation clearer for others:)

 

I do hope that my post is helpful.

 

Thanks

 

Angry Cat

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have never been able to get any of the BAG spreadsheets to work on my computer-

So if anyone has one that is compatible with Microsoft word or works, I would be over the MOON to receive it.

 

Send an e-mail to [email protected] and we will send you a compatible spreasheet.

 

When requesting spreadsheets from [email protected] please state which software you are using and whether you are claiming in Scotland or England. Please keep all queries regarding the spreadsheets to the forum, rather than using the gmail address, Thank you.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've sent off my LBA.

 

So is it now too late to include the Contractual Rate of interest?

 

How do I find out what rate to use please?

Lloyds TSB - £3,300.00 + £250.00 from FOS.

***FULL SETTLEMENT RECEIVED***

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

my capital one claim includes the interest charged on the fee's 29% APR if i recall

Halifax Credit Card - £408.16 - Settled in FULL 26/6/06

Halifax Loans - £397.97 - Settled in FULL 25/8/06

GE Money Topman £216.75 - SETTLED IN FULL

Marbles LBA - £475.00 - £250 Offered :rolleyes:

Halifax Current Account LBA - SETTLED IN FULL

Yorkshire Bank Current Accounts £2271.77 - Issued 30/6/06 - Default Judgement Issued - Warrant of Execution Requested

Capital One - LBA - £88 Knocked of Balance

Egg PPI - LBA

Link to post
Share on other sites

I read the headline on your first post to relate to the £9.25 per hour we can charge

when we are preparing fior our Court hearing as recorded in one of Robertccs' posts.

[My apologies if it was another poster].

Is there not a case for claiming that rate [£9.25] every time we are forced to

respond to the bank or their legal people? For instance in our first letter we add a

rider advising them that as a gesture of goodwill, we will not be charging for this

letter, but advise them that al future correspondence relating to thei matter will

include our costs of £9.25 per hour. And every time we have to respond to them

or their legal reps. we will invoice them with the cost of the response, and add it

to their account.

After all, they have to pay their solicitors fees each and every time they respond

to us. Why should we often have to jump through their hoops and not get paid for it? It might stop them asking time-stalling questions if they know it is gioing to cost them more.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have already sent my preliminary letter off to Barclaycard. Is it too late to amend this and send an updated figure? I have quite clearly stated the amount that I would like returned already. I have put in the 8% figure, while Barclaycard charge well upwards of 20%+ as their interest rate.

Capital One Data Protection Act sent (15th December, 2008)

 

Barclaycard Data Protection Act sent (15th December, 2008)

 

Lloyds TSB Data Protection Act sent on three accounts - Current, Business & Credit Card (15th December, 2008)

Link to post
Share on other sites

As stated quite clearly in the faq's and libraries the 8% should not be added before going to court.

 

Please read very very carefully.

 

As for adding the contractual rate of interest before court, I am still looking into this, and Bankfodder isn't here until Monday, so please be patient until I can follow this through.

 

Sund1ata, you may have to send another letter. I'm not sure what to do here, but if you post the query regarding this in your thread it should get picked up.

[

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, I just got a little confused on things. I have followed things through, and have not added 8% in the first instance.

It's just that BankFodder states: "If you want to do this, you should include a figure for the contractual rate in your Prelim letter and in your LBA."

 

So. Should I have added the contractual rate in my prelim letter or not? Thanks in advance.

Capital One Data Protection Act sent (15th December, 2008)

 

Barclaycard Data Protection Act sent (15th December, 2008)

 

Lloyds TSB Data Protection Act sent on three accounts - Current, Business & Credit Card (15th December, 2008)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah, thankyou for clarifying what BF stated. That clears that up then. Cool. So contractual rate is requested all down the line.

 

With regards to your own letter, if you were going to claim contractual rate, yes you should have put it in your letter, but as you haven't, I don't see any reason tgo stop you putting it in your next letter or your claim.

 

Be carefull to amend any template letters you use for these circumstances, and be prepared to defend if necessary.

 

Good luck.:)

[

Link to post
Share on other sites

HELP my heads in bits, i'm trying to work out the iterest on the charges they;ve took but want to work it out at 3 different rates(8%,overdraft rate 16.9%, and unauthorised borrowing rate 29.8%) I've tried to change the interest at the top but it doesn't make any difference. so I thought i'd work out the 8% easy enough, then times the interest by 1.09% to get the 16.9% rate, now i'm pretty certain that theres something wrong with this but don;t know what? any thoughts :confused:

 

I know i've posted this elsewhere but i really need help quickly:D

OK I GIVE IN

 

Halifax £3600 charges, won with C/I £6400

 

NatWest S.A.R-05/06/06

Bug**r all recieved 03/11/06

Prelim guesimate sent for £3000 03/11/06

Cr*p one CONNED statements 08/06 ROFLMAO

Cr*p one charges=£976

con int 34.9% £1,003.75 £1,979.75.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...