Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • and Brexit Britain err EU Greece becomes first European country to ban bottom trawling in marine parks   Greece becomes first European country to ban bottom trawling in marine parks | Fishing | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM The law will come into force in national parks within two years and in all of the country’s marine protected areas by 2030  
    • Good on them for following the rules. They still haven't proven that I'm the driver though right? I also checked the council's website and there's no planning permission for the signs. No luck with the organ grinder. I think I'll need to take this to court and win to prove my point to the other freeholders.
    • Isas already allow you to earn tax-free interest on up to £20,000 each tax year. But under recent reforms, they are now supposed to be more flexible.View the full article
    • The NTK is pretty good at complying with the Act  as is the Notice to Driver so no help there. I seem to remember OPS getting hammered by a Judge [in brighton I think] so they seem to have tightened po their act since. The organ grinder is the MA and the monkey is OPS.
    • @jk2054 and @BankFodder - Your feedbacks in posts #199 and #202 have been incorporated into the attached WS. As usual, amends are in blue in this draft. Based on other WS drafts I've seen where the issues in dispute are part of the WS, I built my first draft WS in the same format and hadn't seen it to be an issue before. You will notice that the 'witness statement' has been replaced with 'Claimant's Statement' so that issues in dispute does not need to be on a separate page before the WS. This is especially given the work that has gone in to reduce the size of the WS to 8 pages. Also thanks for the suggestions re: confidentiality - I agree with your views and will stand firm on this if a condition of confidentiality is brought up. I have not been approached by Evri on this forum or by email. I haven't yet had success in paying the hearing fee. I am calling the court as often as I can (during work breaks/lunch etc.) and have sent 2 emails to the court requesting a call back. If i don't have any success by the end of this week, I'll send another email chasing for a call back. @BankFodder - Also attached is an invoice from Packlink which shows that I was charged by Packlink for these services: "drop-off at EVRi - Next day delivery" and "Proof of Delivery". It also has the payer's address and there are "Origin" and "Destination" fields which have the postcode of the sender and the recipient (I have redacted personal details in the attached invoice).  I am already including this in my evidence bundle (without the redaction) but wanted to share this redacted version so that other people can consider this as example in their bundle of Packlink and Evri's contract being instigated by the sender of the parcel who has paid for the service, and further shows that there is information in the invoice to identify that a third party beneficiary (sender / recipient) is present in the contract between Packlink and Evri. If this invoice is no good, then please let me know / delete it from this post. Draft - Witness Statement and Court Bundle redacted.pdf Packlink invoice - REDACTED.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Overpaid now being dismissed! Help!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5592 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hey guys,

i did a search before posting, so sorry if i posted anything wrong.

 

basically ive been working for a large (global) IT company for just under two years now, part time (3 days a week).

 

In October 2007 i got promoted and my salary went up by nearly 35%.

 

This week, on Monday 15th Dec 2008, i was called in to see my line manager and was informed that they had been paying me a full time salary since my promotion, instead of a part time salary.

 

I was genuinely shocked and had no idea. honest.

it was a recorded interview, and i immediately said id be prepared to pay it back, but could not afford the lump sum.

i acknowledged that my employer made a mistake and that i was partly to blame also.

 

however, today, i have been suspended and am due to go in for a disciplinary on Tuesday 23rd December 2008.

In the paperwork for the disciplinary it states that i have commited an act of gross misconduct by not informing my employer of the overpayment, and that this is a breakdown in trust and confidence and can result in my dismisal.

 

i was absolutely shocked when reading this.

i asked one of the hr officers what is likely to happen to me in the disciplinary (off the record) and she said it is fairly likely i will be dismissed. as this is what they have done to someone else this happened to a while back, as it is company policy.

 

this is unbeleivably bad news.:(

i still have a mortgage to pay, but my company is one of the worst hit by the credit crunch, and i feel they would rather get rid of me than allow me to work of the debt generated.

 

can anyone offer any advice for me to use in my defence when entering the disciplinary please?

 

i have no idea where to begin.

 

 

thanks for any and all help provided.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

They can't dismiss you for for a mistake "they made" which they have admitted in the recorded interview.

 

It is upto them to inform you of their mistake and not you to inform them, esp as you didnt know.

 

Sounds like they are trying to reduce numbers by any means by using the old "trust and confidence" issue.

 

If you agreed to pay it back (installments or not) they have no case for dismissal.

 

I would start gathering evidence.

Edited by version302003
Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the reply!

it makes me feel a little better.

im not doubting the validity of what your saying, but do you have the link to any kind of legal document that i could possibly take to my hearing with me at all?

 

 

thanks again!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, im currently looking for you now and might take a while. Im sure others with more knowledge / expertise will be online this evening so hang in there. It sounds like they will try to dismiss (based on what they said in the letter)on the trust issue rather than the actual over payment, ill try and find out more on that also

 

One thing to do is to ring ACAS, they are very good.

Edited by version302003
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi noobey,

 

First I got to say that in all reality an employer "can" dismiss for any reason they like BUT and its a big BUT, that does not mean the dismissal is fair, lawful and without repercautions at an ET.

 

If they have it in their heads that they will dismiss on grounds of gross misconduct(whether they are right or wrong), your only cause of action would be through the ET(employment tribunal).

 

Im pretty sure you don't want that and would rather stay in your position and recify the mistake(they made) as opposed to being dismissed and going down the ET route (and hopefully winning) but it maybe your only course of action if they do dismiss.

 

To dismiss you for gross misconduct(of an implied term - trust and confidence) they will need to demonstrate that:

 

1) The overpayment was your fault and / or

2) You knowingly withheld the information of the overpayments from them (breaking their trust and confidence in you).

 

I dont have a link to info about something like your case (but i will keep looking).

 

If you havent already done so ring ACAS on 08457 47 47 47

Its free and confidential.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you say why you told them that you were partly to blame?

hi,

yes in hindsight i should have picked up on it from looking at my bankstatements, payslips, etc but didnt.

 

anyway, my union (unite/amicus) were absolutely rubbish, and i think the £10 per month they get is a complete waste, will be cancelling that asap!

 

today i had my disciplinary, and was as honest as i could be, maybe a bit too honest.

my employer is not firing me, but is putting my on my final written warning, despite the fact that i have never been in ANY trouble before. i am currently trying to figure out how to appeal this.

 

secondly, they want me to pay the whole cash sum back within 12 months. this simply is not possible, i have asked for around 24-36 months to pay it back, but they are not accepting this and now want to see all my bank statements, mortgage details, etc. they have given me 7 days in which to comply.

 

 

what a crap situation, i know it could be worse, but im extremely unhappy with how im being treated here but feel i have no way of fighting back against this billion pound organisation.

 

 

any advice from here would be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi noobey, its good to hear you have not lost your job at least. However in Oct 2007 you got a promotion and a pay rise and it was at this point that the overpayments started, therefore it would not be obvious to you that the pay rise was wrong.

 

In order to show that an overpayment is not recoverable, then the employee must demonstrate three things. Firstly, it must be shown that the overpayment was the fault of the company (it was) and not the employee. Secondly, it must have been reasonable for the employee not to know that they were being overpaid.(just proved that above) Thirdly, the employee must have acted to their disadvantage or the assumption that the payment of salary was correct (for example by spending the money!).(you have spent it) The most common difficulty for employees is the second condition since it is often obvious when an overpayment has occurred. It is not acceptable for an employee to assume that they have received a substantial increase in pay unless there is some reason to believe that this is the case.(and the reason was that you got a promotion and a payrise at the time of the overpayments started)

 

As far as I can see, the amount is not recoverable. Maybe something to think about over xmas. Heres alink for further info which includes repaying the overpayment Overpayments ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi, thanks again for the advice, version.

when i read your posts i get really hyped up with my can-do attitude, but when i go and speak to HR, it never quite comes off like that! : )

 

i have agreed to pay it back, as well as taking part of the blame, as i felt it was the right thing to do.

i didnt know my employer would behave in the way that they have, but im an now going to have to spend new years trying to come up with an action plan.

 

besides my union is there anyone else i can go to to act on my behalf in a dispute with work?

 

 

 

thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...