Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

First step to victory ? (HBOS drops default charges)


Stornoway
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5540 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Simplicity lies at the heart of a unique new current account, to be launched next year. It is expected to be the clearest and most transparent account on the market.

 

 

New Reward account

Credit interest will be replaced by net cash payments of £5 a month when accounts are funded with £1,000 or more, regardless of their debit or credit balance.

 

 

Existing arranged and unarranged overdraft fees and interest rates will be replaced with a daily fee.

 

 

Unlike other offerings on the market, the Reward Current Account has no catches in order to qualify for the £5 net monthly payment.

Traditional unarranged overdraft fees will be removed. No debit interest or monthly unarranged overdraft charges will be applied.

Customers using an arranged overdraft of up to £2,500 will be charged £1 per day for each day they use their overdraft. For those using an arranged overdraft of over £2,500 a charge of £2 per day will be applied for each day they use their overdraft. Customers who use an unarranged overdraft will be charged £5 for each day they use it.

It is intended that all Halifax and Bank of Scotland accounts will move to a daily overdraft charging structure like this during 2009. In the interim, customers can continue to use their existing accounts as normal.

All customers will be able to move to the new account from 8 February.

 

Edited by Stornoway

All comments are my personal views - if in doubt then seek professional advice. If you think i've helped then please tip my scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Customers who use an unarranged overdraft will be charged £5 for each day they use it.

 

This is starting to sound like Barclays new charging system.

 

Lets see 7x5=£35 per week

4x35=£140 per month

 

You can see where this is going !!

 

Lex

Please help us to help you. Download the CAG tool bar for free

HERE and use the search option for all your searches. CAG earns a few pennies every time !!!

 

Please don't rush, take time to read these:-

 

 

&

 

 

This is always worth referring to

 

 

 

 

 

Advice & opinions given by me are personal, are not endorsed by the Consumer Action Group or the Bank Action Group. Should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whilst not perfect I do think a max of £140 a month is a helluva lot better than the £90 a day (for 3 unauthorised payments) + £28 monthly charge that is in place at the moment with Halifax.

 

Most people who slip overdrawn by mistake do so for a couple of days or a week at most.

 

I personlly think this is a great step in the right direction.

All comments are my personal views - if in doubt then seek professional advice. If you think i've helped then please tip my scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

What if you go 10p unautharised overdrawn for 10 days, thats £50. No way is that fair, charge interest on the overdrawn amount, at the current Bank of England rate, thats fair. They run their business on profit from interest. As is the common theme on this site, they can not profit from breach of contract, they can only be reasonably compensated for your breach of contract. Just another example of scaming by simple scamers.

 

Oh yes the bank of england rate is not so good at the moment, so no profit, have to take the rough with the smooth, have not seen them feeling sorry for us when the interest rate has been beyond belief in the past, pay back time Banksters.

Abbey : £8070.41*PAID IN FULL*14/02/07:D

Capital one : LBA sent 17/09/06 £1,087.22

Marbles : LBA sent 17/09/06 £720.00 ; £720 offer accepted:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...