Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • So why are they not respecting the quite clear current voter desires and just s*d off?
    • The digital bank has introduced three new plans - Extra, Perks and Max - replacing its existing Plus and Premium plans for new customers.View the full article
    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

I Am So Relieved - Somebody Who Knows What They Are Talking About


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5611 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi you wonderful guys

I have been trying to find help on a claim that i started online due to a horrible cottage which cost me £585 to stay in for a week. the court hearing was in taunton on the 17th november as the defendant was disputing all the claim. i havent heard a thing since. i have emailed the courts various time but .... nadah .... zip ..... zilch ..... nowt .....nuffink...etc... you get the picture? anyway to cut a long story short, this cottage was booked and paid for, we arrived and it was a state. there was no way we could stay in it. we rang the owner and he basically said ... tough poop (or words to that effect). he is now disputing all the claim, which is the cost of the hols plus my claim fee. however, nothing has been heard from the courts or anyone and i am fed up with all this. its just the thought of this guy having £585 of my money. this took me all year to save up for. i could have gone abroad for 2 weeks with this, instead decided to go to cornwall.... anyway .... i am now ranting. can anyone tell me what i need to do.

i sent all the requested forms back to taunton court and advised them that i had all the photographic and video proof they needed if required.

what do i do now ??

help !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

just reading my last message to you and realised didnt answer your question. on the form it said that i was not required to attend court, but should a further hearing be needed then i would have to chose whether i wanted it to stay at taunton or be nearer my home. really confused with all this!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks so much,

its really great to know that there is someone like you guys to advise and help. its like having my parents on the other end of the computer,tgiving me good advice.

thanks again,

i will ring them tomorrow and let you know how i got on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When the form came through from the court they asked if i would like a mediator to help to come to some agreement with both parties. i ticked yes on this,
I presume this was the Allocation Questionaire (N149)?

 

 

but havent heard anything else since.

 

on the form it said that i was not required to attend court, but should a further hearing be needed then i would have to chose whether i wanted it to stay at taunton or be nearer my home.
Are you still rerferring to the AQ here?

 

Mediation has to be agreed by both parties and if the defendant didn't agree the hearing on Nov 17th may have gone ahead, which means assuming he appeared, he may have been awarded Judgement by Default.

 

If you don't get any joy from Bristol ring Taunton on:

01823 281110

Link to post
Share on other sites

so that means because i couldnt travel 300 miles to taunton he wins because i wasnt there? i was told i didnt need to be there. is there anyway i can contest this as this really doesnt seem fair to me. he gets away with £585 of my money because nobody bothered to tell me that if he doesnt agree with a mediator and i am not in court thats it??!! god i am so annoyed about this. there has got to be a way round this. anybody out there can help me out here?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't know any of this for sure until you phone Bristol and/or Taunton. Wait and see what they say

 

This is in the notes on the AQ:

However, since mediation is a voluntary process, it will only take place if the parties agree

 

Assuming the worst, you can apply to have the judgement set-aside

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...