Jump to content



  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have gone through nearly the whole sar return, it is very large. I am confident to say there is no mention of a default notice within it. 
    • Change Zoom to Online as Zoom is only one platform, and they might use another, it has become the accepted terminology, but best not to refer to a specific platform.  Otherwise looks good The rteal devil of Simon's claim is that he is trying to imply a contract that depends on a Prohibition for Consideration, And its one sided as the person he is binding has no benefit from the contract, apart from paying £100 for the privilege of stopping however briefly.  a nanosecond, a minute 30 minutes kerching that'll be £100 or else.  Simon has also invoiced cars stopped at a Zebra crossing with people crossing at an airport.
    • When she rang BT did she just "mention" about cancelling her Bb contract or did she actually tell them to cancel it?   I've just renegotiated my Bb contract with BT (I know they're useless but I can't be bothered doing too much work to look at any other provider) and I've managed to save money plus they are meant to record 'phone calls and I know (because I spoke to several different call handlers over two weeks) thatthey take very accurate notes of their conversations with customers.   She needs to find out if she actually did cancel the contract.  (I'm sure others will suggest doing a SAR).   Also what sort of contract did she have with BT?  Presumably it included Bb, mobile phone and Sky?  If the contract had just renewed, BT should have emailed her confirming contract details including duration, how to cancel and cancelation fees.  They've just done this for me for the contract I renegotiated two days ago.   EDIT:  It's not clear, but are you saying she's been charged £800 cancelation for Bb or are you saying shae hasn't paid them £800 she owes on her phone?   She ought to be able to look at her BT account online to see what she owes and how her bills are made up.  
    • I can ask the secretary. The mechanic does not wish to talk outside discussing work to be done.
    • i've been thinking this for a while regarding simon and these money making schemes that are not enforceable that he conned loads of seaports and airports to sign up to across the land whereby they already have byelaws covering the activity of motor vehicles upon their lands enforceable by a magistrate.   i think its about time we upped the anti another notch and we begin to stop referring to his signs as 'signs', but now use the term of 'advertising posters' and link that to dropping in the term 'after 10mins the driver by default is automictically enrolled in the moneymaking scheme'   these schemes are akin too... say a free sample of a face cream popup on facebook whereby one accepts the free gift, only to find that if you don't cancel within 30days you've automictically signed up at an extortionate rate, to receive a jar of the cream every month for a year.   just musing.   • The signage is prohibitive in nature and not a genuine offer of terms for parking for the motorist to consider. 
  • Our picks

    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 31 replies
    • Hermes lost parcel.. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422615-hermes-lost-parcel/
      • 49 replies

Minster Baywatch PCN Claimform - xxxx hospital, xxxx (city)help!


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 4191 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

some ill informed fools on here

 

Yes, you are, congratulations.

 

the parking company in question has a legal right to take lagal action

 

Lagal action is what happens on Planet Perky

 

TRUST ME I DO KNOW WHAT Im ON ABOUT

 

Even if I have not mastered CAPs LoCk just yet.

 

foolls on here with there ill informed information and there childish comments,,

As opposed to me, a font of accurate and adult information and comment, lol.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 78
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Probably best not to engage with these numpties too much. No doubt he'll be having a little chuckle at the attention he's received.

 

I await his next incarnation!

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just to update (you guys were so good to me it would be rude to not share the resolution)... I ignored all letters, as someone in this forum said, I got 2 from Minster Baywatch (ignored), 2 from Debt collectors (ignored) and 2 from Charles Grey/Michal Sobell (does this guy even exist???). The last letter was very threatening but I ignored it and have not heard anything since.

 

That was March. It is now May.

 

Make of that what you will... personally, I have been converted into believing PPCs have no authority or power.

 

pieboy

 

"Charles Grey" ? or G.White ? if its Charles Grey thats a new twist.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just thought I would stick my 2 bobs worth in!

I think you are all wasting your time trying to educate people like ruddiger and manfromathens CAGgers.

My grandad once said to me, whenever he came across a particularly simple individual;

 

'You can't educate pork, son'.

I said; 'What do you mean, grandad'?

He said; Thick as pig****, lad, thick as pig****'

:D jed

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 months later...

Ok guys

 

Since my last post I'd forgotten all about teh ticket... today I got a letter from Northampton County Court claiming for £127.43 from the ticket. I only have a few days with which to submit a defence...

 

anyone got any ideas? What shoudl my main points be?

 

Currently I have:

 

The claimant has refused to show proof that I was the driver of the vehicle on the said date.

 

The alleged amount claimed is out of proportion with the real damages that would be sought for such an alleged offence.

 

What else should I put and is it ok to word them like the above?

 

pieboy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok guys sorry for double posting but this is serious and I thought more people might look at it if it were a new thread...

 

Basically I got a PCN from Minster Baywatch in August last year for allegedly parking without a ticket. I got advice not to pay and ignore the letters...

 

Since my last post I'd forgotten all about teh ticket... today I got a letter from Northampton County Court claiming for £127.43 from the ticket. I only have a few days with which to submit a defence...

 

anyone got any ideas? What shoudl my main points be?

 

Currently I have:

 

The claimant has refused to show proof that I was the driver of the vehicle on the said date.

 

The alleged amount claimed is out of proportion with the real damages that would be sought for such an alleged offence.

 

What else should I put and is it ok to word them like the above?

 

Thanks

 

pieboy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Since my last post I'd forgotten all about teh ticket... today I got a letter from Northampton County Court claiming for £127.43 from the ticket. I only have a few days with which to submit a defence...

If you only got the claim today, you have 14 days from the 'deemed date of service' (this will be on the claim form) to acknowledge the claim. If you do that within the 14 days, you then have 28 days from the original 'deemed date of service' to submit a defence. Suggest you post on Pepipoo, where there are some well-versed experts.

 

See here for Minster Baywatch threads:

http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-GB%3Aofficial&q=site%3Aforums.pepipoo.com+Minster+Baywatch&btnG=Search&meta=

Link to post
Share on other sites
Ok guys

 

Since my last post I'd forgotten all about teh ticket... today I got a letter from Northampton County Court claiming for £127.43 from the ticket.

Is this a stamped and genuine document from Northampton County Court?

What does it state in the particulars of claim?

If possible scan document suitably washed of all personal details.

regards

Please remember our troops, fighting and dying in our name. God protect them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah it's stamped and all that...

 

Particulars of claim:

 

"Payment of a parking charge notice together with administration costs associated with its recovery, The defendent?s (sic) vehicle xxxxxxx was parked without authority on private property at xxxx hospital, xxxx (city) on 20/11/2008. Parking charge notice no xxx was issued to this vehicle on 20/11/2008. We are seeking a payment of money for all the full amount of due fees.

 

The claimant claims interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from 20/11/2008 to 21/7/2009 of £2.43 and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgement or earlier payment at a daily rate of £0.01."

 

I'll scan the docs tomorrow.

 

What do you think?

 

pieboy

Link to post
Share on other sites

subscribing ;)

 

FD... taking someone to court and actually standing a chance of winning are 2 different things :)

 

 

HSBC WON three times!!!!! Read about my continuing battle (claim FOUR!) Link HERE

Capital One WON Link

HERE

GE capital (5 accounts) WON link HERE

Lloyds bank account WON second claim starting! link HERE

Budget insurance cough up WON link HERE

Principles WON link HERE

A&L (Mrs Crusher's account) claim link HERE

Barclays claim link HERE

 

Any advice given is on an informal basis only and without prejudice or liability. In in any doubt, consult a qualified lawyer.

IF YOU HAVE GOT YOUR MONEY BACK, PUT SOME BACK INTO THE SITE TO HELP KEEP IT OPEN!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mike Perkins of CPS (ruddiger probably)) has a private forum where they all go and plot together.

 

Unfortunately the likes of UKCPS, Excel and Minster sometimes fall for his bollox and issue half hearted court claims.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with AL start your own thread for this one, should not take long to bin this nonsense, note how they skirt around the issue of the driver and any contract by stating, 'the defendants vehicle'.

Might be worthwhile to pm PT to have a look at your own thread when started.

Please keep us posted on any further developments.

regards

Please remember our troops, fighting and dying in our name. God protect them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Paperwork is peachy. Our OP is accused of 'parking illegally', committing an 'offence' and thus has been issued a 'penalty charge'.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • dx100uk changed the title to Minster Baywatch PCN Claimform - xxxx hospital, xxxx (city)help!
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...