Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • DN is ok DCA NOA is ok, though not one from Newday saying they've sold it. agreement states esigned on a sunday at 11am?? really??  but no typed names or tick box nor any IP address used. if the date is correct then poss ok, it that your correct address for that time of take out? but if not, then that could simply be a copy of someone elses they've used with you details copy'n'pasted over theirs. the agreement details separate T&C's in at least 8.4. a full set of T&C containing your correct address for the time MUST be included. failure renders the agreement unenforceable... have you the T&C's too? dx
    • Npower and Scottish Power and others have always had regulations that require them to treat customers fairly - the threads here and my experiences demonstrate that those regs are little more than useless.   Even Octopus recently spent month after month saying they needed to increase my monthly payments despite my credit balance slowly going up TWICE I had to reset it online back to prior payment as they unilaterally increased it unilaterally. Raised formal complaint and they than said i was paying too much and reduced the payment, again without my agreement, although that time at least they told me they were doing it.   .. and Octopus has been one of the better ones.    
    • Thank you. You left all your personal details showing on the invoice, but I've removed them. From Googling it seems the free parking is limited to one hour.  You stayed two.  There is no point appealing, you did overstay.  That's apart from the fact the private parking companies are just interested in £££££ and never accept appeals. We have other Iceland cases, Iceland as a company refuse to have these invoices cancelled. So it's up to you. Pay £51 and the matter goes away. Or refuse to pay.  Horizon very rarely do court.  We would support you all the way. 
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

I urgently need help to stop a Scottish repo


ewang1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5623 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Accord have stated that they will repossess on 2nd Dec, I havent attended court, but they have and this is the date set, I have made this months payment plus a bit extra towards the arrears and have committed to this going forward, I will this week make my second payment of the monthly mortgage payment and an amount towards the arrears, but they have insisted on a lump sum of £2800 in addition to my payment which I just dont have and cant get without the help of a loan shark, understandably I dont want to go down this route, how else can I keep my home though????

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not sure if Scotland is the same as this country but I am sure somebody will be able to advise soon. Please do not go to a loan shark that will be making the situation so much worse. I am sure where ever you are you can apply to get the repo set aside by applying to court for a hearing.

 

If you have a hearing then the judge will consider a monthly payment towards the arrears. As long as it is a reasonable amount that you can afford.

 

olives xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Has a hearing already taken place?

 

What have you been served with?

 

There are 3 main routes that a creditor can take in Scotland. These are:

 

1) Service of a Calling-up Notice giving 2 months to clear arrears; if arrears are not cleared thecreditor can proceed to sell the property without the need for the court’s permission. If the debtor does not agree to vacate voluntarily, an ordinary action for repossession under section 24 of the Conveyancing and Feudal Reform (Scotland) Act 1970 can be raised to evict the homeowner and family.

 

(2) Service of a Default Notice giving one months notice; followed by an ordinary action for repossession and the power to sell under section 24 of the Conveyancing and Feudal Reform (Scotland) Act 1970.

 

(3) By proceeding on the debtor's default of standard condition 9(1)(b) of the standard security (the 'mortgage') (which reads as follows: 'where there has been a failure to comply with any other requirement arising out of the security). In other words where the debtor has missed mortgage payments. The lender's solicitors can lodge a certificate with the court proceedings raised (typically, by way of initial writ in terms of section 24, of the1970 Act) in terms of section 24(2) of the 1970 Act. The certificate provides prima facie proof of arrears (which could be rebutted if there was evidence to the contrary).

 

Which one of these routes is your creditor going down?

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is the property used for residential purposes and occupied by you as a sole or main residence?

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rory,

 

The hearing has already taken place, although I didnt attend, partly through fear and also as I didn't believe I would have any right to state my case, having read some of the posts on here, pure stupidity I know,

 

The property is purely residential and is my only home, I dont have family in the area either as a back up when I am evicted, my partner also lives with me and has since I bought the property, the mortgage is solely in my name however, the arrears resulted through my being made redundant, I have now returned to work, albeit on a lower salary, I have however made last months and this months mortgage payments plus a bit extra towards the arrears both months, this isnt enough they tell me however.

 

The lender has gone down the 3rd route in terms of the repossession.

 

I really appreciate your time in helping with this nightmare.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay. That's the normal route for a repossession these days. Do you know the outcome of the hearing?

 

Even at this late stage it may be possible for the enforcement order to be supsended under the Mortgage Rights (Scotland) Act 2001. You really need to consult a solicitor regarding this and make an application for the enforcement order to be supsended.

 

Where proceedings have been raised under section 24 of the Conveyancing and Fedual Reform (Scotland) Act 1970 (remedies on default), an application must be made before the conclusion of the proceedings.

 

 

The term, conclusion of the proceedings is not defined within the Act, however, in civil court procedure this is taken to mean when the action has been disposed by way of final decree. A final decree is only obtained once the court has determined the question of legal expenses at the end of the case – which can be at the same time decree is granted, or after decree is granted.

 

So you really need to make an application through a solicitor as a matter of urgency.

 

Where an applicant fails to lodge an application in time, and is subject to decree, it is possible to apply to the court for recall of the decree on one occasion (by way of a 'Reponing Note' in terms of Ordinary Cause Rule 8.1(3). There is case authority supporting this position: GMAC-RFA Ltd v. Murray and Murray (Case Ref A216/2002H) , Sheriff Principal Bowen Q.C, 9 October 2002, Glasgow - reported in Issue 4 Hous LR, October 2003).

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You're being a great help, thanks,

 

The latest letter I got on Saturday states that they are in possession of an extract decree, I take it this means that I need to get a solicitor to try and get a reopening?

 

From your experience, how likely is it that I can get a reopening and then have the enforcement order suspended?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I take it this means that I need to get a solicitor to try and get a reopening?

Yes.

 

From your experience, how likely is it that I can get a reopening and then have the enforcement order suspended?

It depends on the individual case.

 

The sheriff has no wish to allow your property to be repossessed and will look at a number of factors such as how long it will take to pay the arrears e.g. can it be done within a reasonable period, the nature and reasons for the default, any action taken by the creditor to assist the debtor to fulfill their obligations and the ability of the applicant and any other person residing at the house to secure reasonable alternative accommodation.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've seen a solicitor today and all seemed very positive, she is contacting the court this afternoon to try and arrange a reponing which will immediately halt and further eviction until the court can hear the case, some breathing space it would seem for now, until the the next battle starts, thanks for the help and guidance so far, very much appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...