Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The digital bank has introduced three new plans - Extra, Perks and Max - replacing its existing Plus and Premium plans for new customers.View the full article
    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

UK Flyer / Help with Natwest


UK Flyer
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5349 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi UKF

 

 

 

Think that in order to beef up your position, you will need to:

1/ File a new defence (as previously mentioned) You will need to submit your ammended defence using an N244 FORM (application notice) and should cost you £75!Vex

 

Looking through the Allocation Questionnaire can I just not expand on my defence in Section I - Other information and include all the documentation that I hold ... it states have I attached documents and sent them to other parties..?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have done a request... but not in that form... I've emailed the documents...

 

The document has probably been recreated from their internal records. I notice there is a clause allowing the bank to apply quarterly default interest both before and after judgment.

 

We now have evidence that once a loan is transfered to their debt management centre that some defaulted loan accounts are set up to accrue interest in this manner. However, in a number of cases the crucial clause allowing for this was not present in the customers original agreement.

 

I would make them aware of this.

 

Paul

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking through the Allocation Questionnaire can I just not expand on my defence in Section I - Other information and include all the documentation that I hold ... it states have I attached documents and sent them to other parties..?

 

The paperwork has to be in tomorrow - I have received a completed allocation questionnaire from Cobbetts and an advice notice the solicitors have changed to them. I have also received a reply to my letter dated 4 November CPR Part 18 Request with a response, however still no signed copy of my original credit agreement.

 

I am putting together my defence tonight... just wanted to confirm that it is best to use the form N244 and not provide the details through the allocation questionnaire.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Uk Flyer,

 

How you getting on with your defence ?

 

The Crapwest sent me some paperwork last Wed from my SAR request.

It looks like they may have combined my od with the loan agreement.

Will be sending a letter asking for the statements of the od and the loan and to see if it not been put as a router account.

 

Kind Regards

 

Womble

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pretty much there re: defence. Eight pages of it with documentation and Exhibits to match. Just noticed the new solicitors have put the wrong claim number on their Allocation Questionnnaire. Where does that leave them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

With them putting the wrong claim number on that would slow down the process of the claim then.

 

They just dont know what there doing.

Hope i have the same luck with my case with the chuckle brothers solicitors from the Natwest.

DOH !

You couldnt make it up !

Good luck flyer

Link to post
Share on other sites

With them putting the wrong claim number on that would slow down the process of the claim then.

 

They just dont know what there doing.

Hope i have the same luck with my case with the chuckle brothers solicitors from the NatWest.

DOH !

You couldnt make it up !

Good luck flyer

 

Considering that is their primary job, you'd think they'd get the basics right.....

 

Re Allocation Questionnaire and Defence all done and in. I spoke to the courts before filing the questionnaire and they suggested a motion to amend my defence. No forms to fill in, just annotate on the allocation questionnaire that I wished to motion to replace the original defence submitted, pay the appropriate fee - which was £40, and Bob's your Uncle!

 

Copies of everything have also been sent to Cobbetts, so it'll be interesting to see what their next move is.... still no sign of a copy of the original credit agreement with my signature on it....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

My defence has been accepted by the District Judge and the case is now stayed until late February to enable myself and the bank to come to an agreement. I have still not received a copy of my original credit agreement and the bank's solicitors have sent an income and expenditure queationnaire and a request for a proposal of how I intend to repay the debt..... considering I did this right at the beginning of all this happening it seems a little bizarre and almost like we've gone full circle.

 

Just after some advice on the best way to proceed from this point, I don't want to provide the information but still wish to be seen to be trying to resolve this prior to going to court.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Further to events, I wrote a pretty firm letter of what I had thought of the situation, where I stood and what I wanted....

 

I have now been informed that the bank will accept my original offer of £160 per month as a payment subject to entering into a Tomlin Order.

 

We appear to have gone full circle.. apart from all the rubbish I have had to deal with inbetween times and am wondering what to do next... my defence in relation to continuing on to court does seem fairly solid at this point in time....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Flyer

 

I have not seen or seen mentioned here if the agreement was enforcable, what was the outcome on the legality of it?

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Flyer

 

I have not seen or seen mentioned here if the agreement was enforcable, what was the outcome on the legality of it?

 

We haven't actually gone to court yet.... this is all the preamble still.

 

My defence consists of...

 

2. Under OFT Debt collection Guidelines I believe the Claimant's conduct amounts to unlawful harassment under section 40 of The Administration of Justice Act 1970. Notably:

and

4. The claimants particulars of claim are not in full compliance with the Civil Procedure Rules in particular practice direction 16 Para 7.3 which states,

7.3 Where a claim is based upon a written agreement:

A copy of the contract or documents constituting the agreement should be attached to or served with the particulars of claim and the original(s) should be available at the hearing.

The claimant cites at point 4 of the particulars that

‘The claimants claim is in respect of monies due pursuant to an account maintained with the claimant.’

Yet the claimant has, to date, failed to provide a copy of the contract between parties as required under the civil procedure rules.

I have obviously expanded on those statements referencing documents conversations held and brought in past case history to back up the reasons why I no longer feel the debt is valid.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have emailed... thanks.

 

Mmmmm, they claim you signed an agreement in 2002. I would write back and confirm that it is a prerequisite of you entering the tomlin order that they forward you a copy of this signed agreement bearing your signature. I think a court would view this as a reasonable request.

 

Could you email or post the "true copy they've forwarded.

 

Paul

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

The "true copy" looks like it's been recreated from their internal records... unenforeable without your signature. Ask em to forward you a copy containing your sig.

 

I note there's a post judgment interest clause again!

 

Paul

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

The "true copy" looks like it's been recreated from their internal records... unenforeable without your signature. Ask em to forward you a copy containing your sig.

 

I note there's a post judgment interest clause again!

 

Paul

 

I have requested that on several ocassions, but I think I will re-request to make the point. So the gist is they are prepared to accept £160 - my original offer that was turned down, because if it went to court they would not be able to get a judgement against me. Is that correct?

 

What is a post judgment interest clause?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have requested that on several ocassions, but I think I will re-request to make the point. So the gist is they are prepared to accept £160 - my original offer that was turned down, because if it went to court they would not be able to get a judgement against me. Is that correct?

 

What is a post judgment interest clause?

 

The clause allows the bank to apply quarterly contractual interest whilst the account remains in arrears...before and after judgment.

 

How can you be sure you agreed to the terms and conditions if they don't have the original.

 

PW

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Quick update.... having stated that I was prepared to carry onto court rather than now pay £160 - my original offer at the start of all this; Cobbetts have come back stating that their client - Nat West, will accept £100 per month.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

I was informed by Cobbetts at the end of May that Nat West has made the commercial decision not to continue the case. I phone up Nat West Credit Managment and was told that the loan will 'probably be written off'.

 

I subsequently wrote to Credit Services confirming the situation. The reply I received was as follows:

 

'Further to your request we confirm we were not minded to proceed the matter to trial and so the proceedings were discontinued, effectively brought to an end. This was done without prejudice to any rights the Banks may seek to enforce at any time now or in the future.'

 

I would quite like this settled, however it appears with that sentence they could if they wish start proceedings all over again.

 

Any suggestions on what the next course of action should be?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...