Jump to content

  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The card number at the top right of the Advanced Application Form and Agreement does not reflect the same card number the number is 546780 and ends 5931 (however that card was taken out in 2005) the card number on the POC - there isn't one it is just the reference number that they use or they call the 'original account number'.   As for the statement (excel spreadsheet type) that has the same reference number but not credit card number.  However this is different to the spreadsheet paperwork they have sent previously to me. Which looks like it comes from Lloyds and shows the debt being written off by them. I've attached that here.   I wrote to Lowell asking for the deed of assignment and they haven't furnished us with it either. They did state that they don't have it as it is too old or something in the offer letter.      new doc 2021-02-25 08.15.42.pdf
    • Hello All   Update   As per post #83, I had mentioned that for some unusual  reason, there had been two deadlines from the court for responding, namely the 18th of January 2021 and 1st of Feb 2021.   With everyones great help I filed in the response by the18th of Jan 2021. I think I was bit concerned that the claimant, Mike Ashley may use the second deadline as a chance to add a supplementary statement in response to my defence.    Well, Mike Ashely has in fact does exactly this. He has responded and filed a supplementary witness statement and has responded to all the defence points. He has addressed most the issues I had raised in my defence.     His Supplementary WS is dated 30 January 2021 and his solicitors emailed it to me on the 17th of February 2021.   Not sure what to do, but he seems to have amended everything which i could have used as a loophole leaving me with the thought of , should we have waited till the 2nd deadline ie 1ist Feb2021 and submitted the defence rather than the 18th January 2021. this would have deprived him of the chance to response with a supplementary WS. Thats what really had a worried me and I raised it a few times on this platform.     Not sure now because he has kind of amended a few things, removed the incorrect exhibit ( where the signages had belonged to a different site, and called it a clerical error).   Will post his redacted supplementary WS later as at work now.   Thanks all
    • An eye-opening new report from the payment processor Worldpay found so-called 'mobile wallet' payments were used for just under a third of all online transactions in 2020. View the full article
    • Adding to all the other difficulties (address for service, proving an agreement, obtaining enforcement even if you succeeded) that have been raised: Has the obligation to repay yet arisen?   You say the agreement was repayment once the divorce settlement occurred, but then point out settlement has yet to occur!.
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 33 replies

Repossession order even though I paid

Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 4455 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Ok this could get complicated, I have a mortgage with a certain building society everything is paid and up to date. At the start of October I received a letter from HLinteractive (solicitors) stating I had not paid my mortgage and owed £xxxxxx which I must pay a certain amount off each month otherwise they will go to court and get a repossession order. I checked the letter over and realised that they had spelt my wifes name wrong and the mortage account number was one digit different than our own. So we immediatly contacted the bank and explained the error and booked an appointment with the complaints officer. My wife trudged down there and the issue was eventually resolved. It is now the 11th of november and I get the morning post with another letter from HLinteractive stating that if we do not pay £xxxxx by the 18th they will be repossessing our property. This morning my wife went to see the these people and resolve the situation. If any one could give me any good advice on what to do when they come to reposses my property as I know that the wheels have already been set in motion and they will never get there paper work sorted out before the 18th. Thanks alot in advance, and please read my next post on my council tax issues.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Hobson999


They CANNOT repossess your home WITHOUT a court order... They have to take you to court and put their case before a judge, you WILL get notification from your local county court telling you where and when. If you can PROVE that you have paid, then there should be NO ARGUMENT....


But the main point is NO COURT ORDER NO REPO!!!!!


Hope it settles you a litte bit, I am currently fighting mine, and believe me I am learning very quickly!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

And if they take you to court and you can prove that they are wrong because you paid it you can take them to the cleaners

Make notes on all you meetings and telephone calls with them who was there what was said just in case

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies peeps, Well I hav'nt been to court, been summoned or stood infront of a judge and had the opppertunity to do so but I would certainly like the chance. I am sick of being hounded for money I have already paid. If this farce continues I will post back and keep you all up to date and good luck to all of you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi eveyone again, I just received my morning post with a letter from the courts. It states that there was a court hearing on 08/10/2008 which my wife and I did not attend and therefore the court orders that the defendant give the claimant possession of my house. So does this mean they can now come and legally cease my property even though the oustanding debt has nothing to do with my mortgage, building society, or in fact any of my financies as the debt is not mine.:eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

What you need to go is to go to the court office and make an application to have the orderset aside you reasons being 1. you had know knowledge of the hearing on the 8.10.2008 that you are not in arreas it will cost you £70.00 which you can claim back you need to get an uptodate statement from the mortgage company at the same time write to the company ( dont telephone send it recorded delivery and say that they seem to have made a mistake and ask them if they will agree to have the Judgement set aside what date does it have date that you have to give it up

Link to post
Share on other sites

The first payment had to be made by 01/11/08 if no payment is made by the 17/11/08 . We will be issued with a warrant for possession of property. A balliff appointment will then be listed to repossess the property. That is what is said on the letter from the building societies solicitor dated the 10/11/08. Today I received a letter from the courts stating that we did not appear in court on the 08/10/08 and that

The court orders that

1.The defendant give the claiment possession of my property on or before 08/10/08

2. the defendant pay the caiment £xxxxxx being the amount outstanding under the mortgage

3. This order is not to be enforced so long as the defendant pays the claiment the unpaid installments under the mortgage by the payments set out below in addition to the current installments under thwe mortgage

payment required

£xxxxx per month the first installment being paid on or before 01/11/08 and it is judged that

The claiment recover against the defendant the sum of £xxxxxxxx for debt and interest to date of judgement.

No actual date for the repossession on the letter. hope this clears up any misunderstandings and thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In English, basically they are saying as long as you keep paying they are not going to take your house! But as you have only just received the court hearing notification I would go to court and ask for it to be set aside. Its been suspended in effect.


Take it back to court, you cant let them get away with it. Check your next mortgage stayment, you may find solicitors costs added to your balance, ask for them back aswell.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It just doesnt seem right have they got the right names and you right address on all the paperwork and is there ref nummber your account number

Link to post
Share on other sites

Redstone did the same to me!!! They actually gained possession of my home, which is why I am fighting and learning lessons the hard way. if I can stop some one else going through it, then it may all be worth it......


They told me I was in arrears even though I had paid them. I had proven time and time again that I had paid them. Eventually they gained possession on a technicality, which I am challenging in the high court of London.


Did Kensington or your local county court send you a defence form, basically its a form asking your side of the story? Or do they say they did?

Like Bona says, have you EVER been in arrears, If yes they have probably used that to show you as an eratic payer..


You need to get back into court and fight them. Did the envelope that the court order came in have a post mark on it? If it did is it only recent? because that can only help your case about not knowing of the court date.


Ask for it to be set aside, or failing that get a suspension. Set aside means IF you do go into arrears, Kensington have to start all over again to get possession, ie file a hearing request, give you time to respond etc etc. Suspension means that should you go into arrears, Kensington can just ask the court for an order for your home as you are not paying as agreed.


I hope they realise they are being silly and stop all of this before you do have fight them. But in the meantime...We are here to assist.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have never been in arrears with my mortgage. I am not in arrears with my mortgage. Only the account which is not mine and I have no mortgage for that amount etc. The account with the wrong number on has my details on it but it is not my account, I don't know where this mystery account came from I have no access to it I just get sent the repossession orders for it against my property which I have lived in for 18 years. If I phone my bank and ask qestions about the account I have my mortgage on everything is in order. I have been back in contact with the complaints liason officer who originally sorted this mess out, and he is looking into it. My wife has also been to see the solicitors company who have also been told by the debt liason officer that this is just one big mistake (she phoned him at the solicitors). Now tomorrow she has to travel back to the solicitors to pick up a letter, which should generally work as a get out of jail card should the balliffs turn up. But I will beleive that when I see it. As for the courts I will have to take a trip down there on Monday but thanks for listening.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to go for damages and what ever you do dont take there word for it I would get down to the court make an application and ask the Judge for all your costs which could be considerable and nthen get damages from the Mortgage Company What ever they say you have a court repossession order against you which will staythere till a Judge removes it

Link to post
Share on other sites
And if they take you to court and you can prove that they are wrong because you paid it you can take them to the cleaners

Make notes on all you meetings and telephone calls with them who was there what was said just in case


and charge them for your time :D including the hours and hours of researching on the internet! :confused:

HTH (Hope This Helps) RDM2006





We've Helped You To Claim - Now Help Us Remain

A live Site - Make a Donation


All advice and opinions given by people on this site are personal, and are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, please seek qualified professional legal Help.


However, if you have found any advice you have been given helpful.

Why not show your gratitude And

Click the * on the post you found helpful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well that is most interesting, so regardless of what the building society and there soliciters tell me I will still have a repossession order against me until I personnally get the judge to remove it. Well I am annoyed now, so I am going down to the courts on monday and I am going to sort this out. Not one of them even mentioned this, they are way out of order. Thanks alot for the advice I'll post back as soon as I know more.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 4 weeks later...

yeas how did you get on.


Have you checked your credit file to see what damage they have done there?


I hope you are fighting for a decent amount of compensation for wasted time /stress etc.

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)


offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed


"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery




Link to post
Share on other sites

Please get a copy of your most recent mortgage statements and then go personally to the court which sent you the suspended possession order.


Speak to the court staff and they will give you the relevant form to have this order cancelled at a hearing in front of a judge.


You will get a hearing and once a judge is in possession of the facts you will get the Order cancelled.


Please also claim as many costs as you can against these idiots.


Ell-enn will no doubt be of great help as in many cases before yours.


Additionally consider engaging a solicitor in court because you may well get more of what is rightfully yours monetarily.


Incidentally I would suggest that any order against you is actually worthless because one name on it will be incorrect.


All the very best



Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone thanks for your help and quick replies. Just a final update to say the building society accepted there mistake and have given us a few months free mortgage. As the solicitors company never carried out the building societies request to stop the repossession we have now acquired our own solicitors and are suing them for numerous reasons. Which our solicitor has guarranteed us we will get compensation. So hopefullly this will be the end of it. I hope anybody who has had the same problems as we have should at least contact a solicitor. As it was not our fault we are entittled to compensation for other peoples mistakes, and to be honest would your building society be sympathetic if it was your mistake.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...