Jump to content



  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I hope you mean I try to help people stand up to bullying - and not do the bullying!   I'll assume it's a compliment!     Well - that sort of demonstrates that you've not understood my point and (perhaps?) haven't actually read the OP?   My point is that it is not the boyfriend (the supposed "owner" of the car park) who is posting, but his girlfriend who believes that he "owns" his car parking space.  Yes - it usually makes sense to believe that what the OP is posting is the truth, but in this case there is every reason to believe that there is a possibility that the OP might be mistaken about her boyfriend's ownership of the parking space, because...  well, how would she know for sure whether he does or not?  He might be boasting or lying or simply mistaken.  (My understanding is that many people who "own" flats are often under the mistaken apprehension that they "own" a parking space when they don't.  All the more reason then that somebody else other than the "owner" might be even more mistaken).   I suppose what I'm getting at is that I was a bit surprised that both you and dx100uk were able to give such definite and certain answers to the OP without exploring her situation a bit more fully and ensuring that she fully and correctly understood her boyfriend's rights in respect of the parking space in question.  I was simply concerned that without getting more information from the OP, then the replies given to her might prove to be less than useful.  I wouldn't want her to leave thinking that there was absolutely nothing to worry about and then find out there was because she'd been misadvised because she didn't understand whether her BF "owned" the space or not.   Of course, it may be that my concern here makes absolutely no difference to the answer that needs to be given to the OP because it doesn't matter whether her boyfriend actually "owns" the parking space or not, which is fine.  But sometimes I think it would be helpful to the OP (and other readers like myself) if some of these legal niceties could be spelled out rather than left unexplained.    
    • I've spoken to my son in law and because the gearbox can be very expensive to repair, he would prefer to reject the car.   The garage isn't going to charge storage at the moment.   I feel they have been mislead regarding the service history.   How difficult would it be to get the finance company on our side in rejecting the car and sending back to the dealer?
    • The first thing to say is that you better go ahead and refund the buyer because otherwise she will end up getting negative feedback as well. We will try and help you get your money back from Hermes. Have you made a formal claim through Hermes and have they formally declined you and giving you reasons why? Presumably the item was properly declared and properly valued when the delivery was booked. You don't say whether or not you took out their so-called insurance. Please start off by reading around the sub- forum focusing particularly on the Hermes threats. There are lots of them. Get to understand the principles in respect of the arguments – the insurance element, your third party rights despite the fact that you booked it through Packlink. Have a look at other people's experiences of having sued Hermes, the process of issuing the claim, the defence, the mediation and have a close look at the advice that we give about how to handle mediation. It's highly likely that you will have to issue claim papers so also read around to understand the steps you need to take to bring a small claim in the County Court. It's straightforward but understanding the steps will make you far more confident about what you are doing. Have you started a formal complaint against Hermes and Packlink?
    • Christmas Wonderland has been allowed to reopen because it sells real Christmas trees. View the full article
  • Our picks

Locked in car park


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 3360 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I'd be suspicious too.

 

Has Fred got anybody that will house sit whilst he's gone?

Any knowledge I possess or advice I proffer is based solely on my experiences in the University of Life. Please make your own assessment of legality, risks & costs before taking any action.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another visit has just happened. This time the Lyons Davidson person, got out the car (a different one) and approached Fred who was outside, verified his identity and handed him a large package.

I'm round there now and am just going through it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A printout of this thread? are they trying to get the case struck out?

 

An apology?

 

Can't be evidence they don't have any......

You have the right to food money.

If you don't mind a little investigation, humiliation, and if you cross your fingers rehabilitation..............

Link to post
Share on other sites

the video being broken down into still photos frames?

Please note:

 

  • I am employed in the IT sector of a high street retail chain but am not posting in any official capacity,so therefore any comments,suggestions or opinions are expressly personal ones and should not be viewed as an endorsement or with agreement of any company.
  • i am not legal trained in any form.
  • I have many experiences in life and do often use these in my posts

if ive been helpful kick my scales, if ive been unhelpful kick the scales of the person more helpful :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a large black ring binder filled with the correspondence and evidence for the hearing.

That now appears to be the second bundle to arrive this week.

This one has sometimes multiple copies of the same letter:confused:

It also has copies of letters between LD and the police trying to get evidence for their case, but failing miserably. There are also communications from Universal Security. They're quite funny actually.

Our friendly paralegal at LD sent them an urgent fax on 22nd July (6 days before they went belly-up) asking for the make, model and serial number of the damaged barrier and replacement. Bear in mind the judge made the order, giving them 28 days on 3rd July:p

The response they got from US uk only gives information from after the barrier was replaced and has nothing to say about the make, except that sometime later a new RIB arm was fitted to the new barrier.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so they still cant confirm the origional barrier then?

 

so guesses on the next name its claimmed to be, fusi, laod, faac, no wait they wont admit the last one

Please note:

 

  • I am employed in the IT sector of a high street retail chain but am not posting in any official capacity,so therefore any comments,suggestions or opinions are expressly personal ones and should not be viewed as an endorsement or with agreement of any company.
  • i am not legal trained in any form.
  • I have many experiences in life and do often use these in my posts

if ive been helpful kick my scales, if ive been unhelpful kick the scales of the person more helpful :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites
I'll take this new bundle home with me TLD and scan it for you.:D

 

Okay thanks it's a safe bet we'll find things in there which will help Freds case. I'm mildly surprised they've done this I'd have thought their time would be better spent trying to find valid responses to the concerns raised in the latest Court order because if they don't then it's highly unlikely there ever will be a need for this bundle.

 

Say what you will about Lyons-Davidson but they are certainly very cheap. Don't think I'd use them myself though but at £80 for all this work you have to wonder how they manage to pay the bills.

Edited by Toulose LeDebt

You have the right to food money.

If you don't mind a little investigation, humiliation, and if you cross your fingers rehabilitation..............

Link to post
Share on other sites
so they still cant confirm the origional barrier then?

 

so guesses on the next name its claimmed to be, fusi, laod, faac, no wait they wont admit the last one

 

There was an application for the enforcement of a Court Order which will make this subject rather tricky for Lyons-Davidson to deal with in the 4 apps of the 6th August.

 

The more-so since it has become common knowledge and entered into Court that 'No records exist' as reiterated by Patma in the post above.:-D

Edited by Toulose LeDebt

You have the right to food money.

If you don't mind a little investigation, humiliation, and if you cross your fingers rehabilitation..............

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gosh ten thousand sterling eh? seems a tad excessive for a small claims case. Perhaps as Fred has intimated to the Court this case would be better being re-allocated to a different track of course the claimant would then have to comply with a whole new set of rules concerning disclosure and evidence plus the legalities will be taken more shall we say seriously and this can only be to Freds benefit.

 

Still £10,000 shows the Judge whats really been going on here and puts the Part 20 counterclaim into perspective. Can't wait to see how they break that sum down Mark must be on a hefty wedge for a Paralegal.

Edited by Toulose LeDebt

You have the right to food money.

If you don't mind a little investigation, humiliation, and if you cross your fingers rehabilitation..............

Link to post
Share on other sites
Makes their part 36 offer of £3.5k PLUS COSTS even more amusing, of course. :razz:

 

Rolf.gif

 

 

 

Or is it ROFL?

You have the right to food money.

If you don't mind a little investigation, humiliation, and if you cross your fingers rehabilitation..............

Link to post
Share on other sites

A little something from LDs web site:

 

If you haven't already noticed, at Lyons Davidson, we pride ourselves on being different from other law firms.

 

 

Anyone care to add a second line? Go on, I dare you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seven EDIT eight visitors?

Come on all you Lyons Davidson staff move along back to work there's nothing to see here, haven't you got a fistful of Court orders to respond to?

You won't find the answers browsing internet messageboards you know, no wonder your case is such a crock of cr@p, a little more application needed though I'm sensing the only application you are familiar with is Microsoft messenger :rolleyes:;)LOL :cool::D ROFL :shock::shock: :-|LMAO :p:p;):rolleyes::?:oops:

Edited by Toulose LeDebt

You have the right to food money.

If you don't mind a little investigation, humiliation, and if you cross your fingers rehabilitation..............

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm a little bemused at the fact it was delivered in person, which imo, could again be seen as an attempt at intimidation.

 

If there is nothing new in the bundle why couldnt it be posted?

If you find my post helpful please click on the scales at the top. Thank you

FAQ SECTION HERE

 

Halifax Bank Claim filed and settled

Halifax Credit Card settled

Argos Store Card settled

 

CCA requests sent to

Halifax Credit Card

LLoyds TSB Credit Card

Capital One

Moorcroft (Argos)

NDR

18/06/09

Link to post
Share on other sites

And to the guests, would it be easier if one of us emailed the thread to you, that way you could get on with answering the court order

If you find my post helpful please click on the scales at the top. Thank you

FAQ SECTION HERE

 

Halifax Bank Claim filed and settled

Halifax Credit Card settled

Argos Store Card settled

 

CCA requests sent to

Halifax Credit Card

LLoyds TSB Credit Card

Capital One

Moorcroft (Argos)

NDR

18/06/09

Link to post
Share on other sites
A little something from LDs web site:

 

If you haven't already noticed, at Lyons Davidson, we pride ourselves on being different from other law firms.

 

 

Anyone care to add a second line? Go on, I dare you

 

Well...... if you insist.

 

If you haven't already noticed, at Lyons Davidson, we pride ourselves on being different from other law firms.

 

Lyons Davidson where special treatment meets special needs.

Edited by Toulose LeDebt

You have the right to food money.

If you don't mind a little investigation, humiliation, and if you cross your fingers rehabilitation..............

Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm a little bemused at the fact it was delivered in person, which imo, could again be seen as an attempt at intimidation.

 

If there is nothing new in the bundle why couldnt it be posted?

 

That was the third or fourth time they've been to Freds house so I don't think you'd be wrong in mentioning that it is intimidating behaviour.

 

As for the question 'Why couldn't it be posted'? I suspect it's because Lyons-Davidson left it too late, the papers had to be in 14 days before the set hearing date.

Edited by Toulose LeDebt

You have the right to food money.

If you don't mind a little investigation, humiliation, and if you cross your fingers rehabilitation..............

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 3360 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...