Jump to content

  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Kim Kyeong Yeon developed his virus-destroying machine after his child injured herself. View the full article
    • not interested in silly letter   the CCa return please   dx  
    • This is interesting as I was not aware that there was a difference in the PPI claims/calculations.    Long story: I asked for this PPI reclaim over 5 years ago.  The Woolwich loan was taken out when I had a Woolwich current account.  The banking sort code for Woolwich was deleted off the banking system when Barclays inherited it hence they could not find my current account let alone the loan.    They had told me that I had provide proof of the loan as they could not locate it.  I did the FCA deadline search and it still was not located.    As this was the last resort, I had to go into the loft and found it by chance.  They changed the new reference number from the search and attached it to the old past reference number as the complaint was still on their system.    Even speaking to them about their calculations and the one I got from the on-line calculators, no one can explain the difference, they just keep saying that they cannot speak to the PPI calculations team, they have to email them!    Also I thought the Plevin paragraph was standard information.  So this is where the mystery lies,   I can reject the Plevin calculation and ask for calculations based on my actual PPI sums paid,   would this then be in line with your calculator?
    • so who remembers this utter cobblers spun by the right wing (which was of course denied by Nissan - as it was cobblers)   https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/markets/article-7962367/Nissans-Brexit-boost-Car-giant-secret-plan-close-EU-factories.html
    • If only that was his worst .. absolute peanuts compared to his recent wastes though ..   £500 million to tory pals in failing to collect a couple of hundred spit samples a day £12 Billion on Trace a test which has largely collapsed at the very start of the winter upsurge £88-100 Billion+ on Brexit as of earlier this year just in lost growth (from memory) Over a £Trillion in assets fled to the EU (Including Redwood and Ress Mogg) £288 million a week ongoing for Brexit and post brexit customs bureaucracy - whenever they get the systems running Nissan and Toyota saying UK taxpayer pay any Brexit tariff bills or Plants including Sunderland are unsustainable   How much are the lorry parks costing?   ... and he still REFUSES to feed hungry UK kids  
  • Our picks

    • Hermes lost parcel.. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422615-hermes-lost-parcel/
      • 49 replies
    • Oven repair. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/427690-oven-repair/&do=findComment&comment=5073391
      • 49 replies
    • I came across this discussion recently and just wanted to give my experience of A Shade Greener that may help others regarding their boiler finance agreement.
       
      We had a 10yr  finance contract for a boiler fitted July 2015.
       
      After a summer of discontent with ASG I discovered that if you have paid HALF the agreement or more you can legally return the boiler to them at no cost to yourself. I've just returned mine the feeling is liberating.
       
      It all started mid summer during lockdown when they refused to service our boiler because we didn't have a loft ladder or flooring installed despite the fact AS installed the boiler. and had previosuly serviced it without issue for 4yrs. After consulting with an independent installer I was informed that if this was the case then ASG had breached building regulations,  this was duly reported to Gas Safe to investigate and even then ASG refused to accept blame and repeatedly said it was my problem. Anyway Gas Safe found them in breach of building regs and a compromise was reached.
       
      A month later and ASG attended to service our boiler but in the process left the boiler unusuable as it kept losing pressure not to mention they had damaged the filling loop in the process which they said was my responsibilty not theres and would charge me to repair, so generous of them! Soon after reporting the fault I got a letter stating it was time we arranged a powerflush on our heating system which they make you do after 5 years even though there's nothing in the contract that states this. Coincidence?
       
      After a few heated exchanges with ASG (pardon the pun) I decided to pull the plug and cancel our agreement.
       
      The boiler was removed and replaced by a reputable installer,  and the old boiler was returned to ASG thus ending our contract with them. What's mad is I saved in excess of £1000 in the long run and got a new boiler with a brand new 12yr warranty. 
       
      You only have to look at TrustPilot to get an idea of what this company is like.
       
      • 3 replies
    • Dazza a few months ago I discovered a good friend of mine who had ten debts with cards and catalogues which he was slavishly paying off at detriment to his own family quality of life, and I mean hardship, not just absence of second holidays or flat screen TV's.
       
      I wrote to all his creditors asking for supporting documents and not one could provide any material that would allow them to enforce the debt.
       
      As a result he stopped paying and they have been unable to do anything, one even admitted it was unenforceable.
       
      If circumstances have got to the point where you are finding it unmanageable you must ask yourself why you feel the need to pay.  I guarantee you that these companies have built bad debt into their business model and no one over there is losing any sleep over your debt to them!  They will see you as a victim and cash cow and they will be reluctant to discuss final offers, only ways to keep you paying with threats of court action or seizing your assets if you have any.
       
      They are not your friends and you owe them no loyalty or moral duty, that must remain only for yourself and your family.
       
      If it was me I would send them all a CCA request.   I would bet that not one will provide the correct response and you can quite legally stop paying them until such time as they do provide a response.   Even when they do you should check back here as they mostly send dodgy photo copies or generic rubbish that has no connection with your supposed debt.
       
      The money you are paying them should, as far as you are able, be put to a savings account for yourself and as a means of paying of one of these fleecers should they ever manage to get to to the point of a successful court judgement.  After six years they will not be able to start court action and that money will then become yours.
       
      They will of course pursue you for the funds and pass your file around various departments of their business and out to third parties.
       
      Your response is that you should treat it as a hobby.  I have numerous files of correspondence each faithfully organised showing the various letters from different DCA;s , solicitors etc with a mix of threats, inducements and offers.   It is like my stamp collection and I show it to anyone who is interested!
        • Thanks
        • Like

Locked in car park


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 3330 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Ok thanks I understand that, but Fred wasn't invited to respond to their app to amend their POC. It was just accepted.

I can see how they're going to struggle to have anything useful to say though.:D

 

That's because at the time that application was made the Judge believed both parties were acting honestly, truthfully and within the spirit of CPR.

One can only guess what has occurred since then to give the Judge doubts about the merits of one parties case.:eek::eek:

You have the right to food money.

If you don't mind a little investigation, humiliation, and if you cross your fingers rehabilitation..............

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 2.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Did Fred submit anything in those applications which was not 100% true and backed up with evidence???

 

The wording of the order also implies that the Judge has seen matters of real concern in Freds amended defence, he has ordered written response to all four apps not just the variation and enforcement ones.

Take that as a very large positive.

You have the right to food money.

If you don't mind a little investigation, humiliation, and if you cross your fingers rehabilitation..............

Link to post
Share on other sites
Did Fred submit anything in those applications which was not 100% true and backed up with evidence???

Nope every last word is backed up by proof.:D

 

It's astounding to me that this miniscule bundle of the claimant's compounds their doom by repeating some of the false allegations we've already laid to rest.

It would appear that their left hand doesn't know what their right hand is doing.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Did Fred submit anything in those applications which was not 100% true and backed up with evidence???

 

The wording of the order also implies that the Judge has seen matters of real concern in Freds amended defence, he has ordered written response to all four apps not just the variation and enforcement ones.

Take that as a very large positive.

 

 

I may be the uninvited Devil's advocate in this thread, but even I see this as being very positive. Clearly Fred's case isn't just being ignored, but taken more seriously. I hope.

Link to post
Share on other sites
I may be the uninvited Devil's advocate in this thread, but even I see this as being very positive. Clearly Fred's case isn't just being ignored, but taken more seriously. I hope.

You're never univited AT.:D

To hear you saying this is a positive step is most encouraging, because you certainly bring a very objective eye to our deliberations.

I can tell you also, that we now have an appointment at Devon and Cornwall Police Headquarters this coming Thursday afternoon. We're taking our not inconsiderable stack of evidence with us.:-D

Link to post
Share on other sites
We have quite a few guests today. They may need cheering up. Can anyone thing of anything encouraging to say to them?;)

 

The death penalty was abolished some years ago!

The REAL Axis of evil: Banks, Credit Card Companies & Credit Reference Agencies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

'Can anyone thing of anything encouraging to say to them?'

 

How about; I have noticed that the Western Morning News and the West Briton seem to be carrying more 'Situations Vacant' advertisments in the last few issues - 'Cattle Herdsmen (Holiday Cover only)' might appeal!

 

Don't worry folks, you don't normally need a CRB check to work with animals.

 

:D:D:D

Edited by Helford
p.s. added
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
I may be the uninvited Devil's advocate in this thread, but even I see this as being very positive. Clearly Fred's case isn't just being ignored, but taken more seriously. I hope.

 

In all fairness to the Court they only became aware of the issues very recently and this order is their first correspondence on the matter so it would be wrong to say Fred was being ignored prior to this as he just hadn't made representation of the facts until 6th August.

 

Having given them enough rope to hang the whole sorry bunch Fred simply decided enough was enough and snapped it taut.

 

It's also possible as a result of Freds apps, the Judge revisited the hearing of July 1st and realised that the claimant had pulled a bit of a fast one on the Court as well.

 

I just don't know how Lyons-Davidson can possibly respond to this order. They've already admitted holding no records, the hearing of July was recorded, the rest is well documented and all in Freds favour. I'm not even convinced the Judge would permit them to discontinue in the circumstances such is the gravity of their behaviour.

Edited by Toulose LeDebt

You have the right to food money.

If you don't mind a little investigation, humiliation, and if you cross your fingers rehabilitation..............

Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm not even convinced the Judge would permit them to discontinue in the circumstances such is the gravity of their behaviour.

They are in a spot then for sure.

If the hearing goes ahead under the circumstances, it will be a most interesting event. Wonder how many seats there are for spectators?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been following the case for a couple of months and it's been very interesting through out.

 

I'd love to be in the court room in september, just to see the kodak moment of the poor claiment person (well not really) realising that representing the PCAD is suicide lol!

Link to post
Share on other sites

What's really funny here Patma is that the claimant was served a copy of the applications and the supporting documentation as per the CPR requirements and has been ordered to explain themselves on the basis of that bundle. What they don't know is what was contained in the significantly thicker bundle of documents that was supplied to the Court a week or two earlier. Since those docs were not filed as part of the proceedings per se then Fred was under no obligation to serve a copy upon the claimant.

But we know that fridays Judge had those documents as well as the formal application documents which puts the claimant in a very precarious position if they're going to try and blag their way out because the Judge knows a lot more background than is actually revealed in the docs of the 6th August and they are now in a position where they cannot possibly know just exactly what the Judge does know about their claims.

They will have to be very careful indeed in their reply because the Judge already has many of the answers and I suspect is just as much seeking confirmation from the claimant as an explanation and any anomalies in their reply to this order will be spotted a country mile off now.:p

You have the right to food money.

If you don't mind a little investigation, humiliation, and if you cross your fingers rehabilitation..............

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very true, TLD

Those 13 separate documents, each one signed with a statement of truth, simply because they are nothing but the unvarnished truth, backed up by solid proof, stand alone if necessary.

You created a devastating blow to the claimant's case by writing those and the court manager, quite properly passed them onto the judge alongside the applications.:cool:

When the time is right, they should be posted for everyone to see how blooming good they were.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pat & TLD

 

interesting document by HSE on these barriers, in that they must be secure when down etc , well worth a read

 

and not as seen in the famous video clip

 

Advice on horizontal swing car park barriers

NEVER FORGET

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Help Our Hero's Website

 

http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/

 

HIGHWAY OF HEROES

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bear-garden/181826-last-tribute-our-lads.html

 

Like Cooking ? check the Halogen Cooker thread

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bear-garden/218990-cooking-halogen-cookers.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's why they were submitted to the Court manager and not as part of a formal application. Currently you know and I know whats in them but PCAD and their representatives don't because there was never any obligation to serve a copy upon them in those circumstances.

 

But with them having been supplied to the Court manager the Judge simply would not have been doing his job properly if he had not taken a look through them before reaching a decision on the formal applications submitted a couple of weeks later.

 

So by order of the Court the claimant has to respond to the formal applications knowing (by virtue of monitoring this thread) that the Court has a very comprehensive bundle of evidence in the matter (the content of which is unknown to the claimant) and is quite possibly now just sitting and waiting for the claimant to hang themselves. Nice.

Edited by Toulose LeDebt

You have the right to food money.

If you don't mind a little investigation, humiliation, and if you cross your fingers rehabilitation..............

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Kiptower, I don't wish to 'take the wind out of your sails', but this article was published after a few horrific incidents with swinging horizontal barriers that had not been secured, rather than vertically lifting barriers such as that at PCAD car park. Notwithstanding, it just goes to show the sort of grief any non maintained and non -

supervised barrier presents.

 

The main incident leading to this HSE report being published is here:

 

BBC NEWS | Wales | Unlawful killing in barrier death

Edited by Helford
Clarified!
Link to post
Share on other sites

no problem it was the point of barriers secured when down etc i was making , and non maintained, unlike the one in the video of Freds

NEVER FORGET

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Help Our Hero's Website

 

http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/

 

HIGHWAY OF HEROES

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bear-garden/181826-last-tribute-our-lads.html

 

Like Cooking ? check the Halogen Cooker thread

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bear-garden/218990-cooking-halogen-cookers.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

An interesting and possibly on topic comment was made yesterday by the Magistrates Association in a press release opposing the proposal for careless driving to become a fixed penallty offence.

 

'Regrettably, recent experience with out-of-court disposals shows that the police cannot be relied on to use them appropriately or as intended. Once they have been given these powers, the police will misuse them, that is a certainty'

You have the right to food money.

If you don't mind a little investigation, humiliation, and if you cross your fingers rehabilitation..............

Link to post
Share on other sites

That sounds pretty fair comment, TLD, in view of Fred's experiences.

The BMW returned today btw, this time with 2 people in it, a man and a woman. Partial number plate obtained.;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would get Fred to go out and pointedly take photos of the car. I'm sure the judge wouldnt take to kindly to intimidation either.

If you find my post helpful please click on the scales at the top. Thank you

FAQ SECTION HERE

 

Halifax Bank Claim filed and settled

Halifax Credit Card settled

Argos Store Card settled

 

CCA requests sent to

Halifax Credit Card

LLoyds TSB Credit Card

Capital One

Moorcroft (Argos)

NDR

18/06/09

Link to post
Share on other sites
That sounds pretty fair comment, TLD, in view of Fred's experiences.

The BMW returned today btw, this time with 2 people in it, a man and a woman. Partial number plate obtained.;)

 

 

That is shocking. I do hope that Fred will be handing over the details of the vehicle and the incidents along with any identifying number to the police whilst he's at HQ tomorrow. They're clearly up to no good whoever they are and there's no guarantee it is who we think it is so it might be a good idea if the police were made aware of such suspicious behaviour.

If it is somebody following this thread then they already know that Fred will be out tomorrow afternoon over at Police HQ in Exeter so they would know that they'd have several hours in which to burgle his house.

You have the right to food money.

If you don't mind a little investigation, humiliation, and if you cross your fingers rehabilitation..............

Link to post
Share on other sites
Good point, TLD. I'll see that it's mentioned to the police.

 

Of course if it does transpire that it's the Plymouth branch of Lyons Davidson doing a little extra curricular research then stick that complaint in the pile for the SRA.

You have the right to food money.

If you don't mind a little investigation, humiliation, and if you cross your fingers rehabilitation..............

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 3330 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...