Jump to content



  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I hope you mean I try to help people stand up to bullying - and not do the bullying!   I'll assume it's a compliment!     Well - that sort of demonstrates that you've not understood my point and (perhaps?) haven't actually read the OP?   My point is that it is not the boyfriend (the supposed "owner" of the car park) who is posting, but his girlfriend who believes that he "owns" his car parking space.  Yes - it usually makes sense to believe that what the OP is posting is the truth, but in this case there is every reason to believe that there is a possibility that the OP might be mistaken about her boyfriend's ownership of the parking space, because...  well, how would she know for sure whether he does or not?  He might be boasting or lying or simply mistaken.  (My understanding is that many people who "own" flats are often under the mistaken apprehension that they "own" a parking space when they don't.  All the more reason then that somebody else other than the "owner" might be even more mistaken).   I suppose what I'm getting at is that I was a bit surprised that both you and dx100uk were able to give such definite and certain answers to the OP without exploring her situation a bit more fully and ensuring that she fully and correctly understood her boyfriend's rights in respect of the parking space in question.  I was simply concerned that without getting more information from the OP, then the replies given to her might prove to be less than useful.  I wouldn't want her to leave thinking that there was absolutely nothing to worry about and then find out there was because she'd been misadvised because she didn't understand whether her BF "owned" the space or not.   Of course, it may be that my concern here makes absolutely no difference to the answer that needs to be given to the OP because it doesn't matter whether her boyfriend actually "owns" the parking space or not, which is fine.  But sometimes I think it would be helpful to the OP (and other readers like myself) if some of these legal niceties could be spelled out rather than left unexplained.    
    • I've spoken to my son in law and because the gearbox can be very expensive to repair, he would prefer to reject the car.   The garage isn't going to charge storage at the moment.   I feel they have been mislead regarding the service history.   How difficult would it be to get the finance company on our side in rejecting the car and sending back to the dealer?
    • The first thing to say is that you better go ahead and refund the buyer because otherwise she will end up getting negative feedback as well. We will try and help you get your money back from Hermes. Have you made a formal claim through Hermes and have they formally declined you and giving you reasons why? Presumably the item was properly declared and properly valued when the delivery was booked. You don't say whether or not you took out their so-called insurance. Please start off by reading around the sub- forum focusing particularly on the Hermes threats. There are lots of them. Get to understand the principles in respect of the arguments – the insurance element, your third party rights despite the fact that you booked it through Packlink. Have a look at other people's experiences of having sued Hermes, the process of issuing the claim, the defence, the mediation and have a close look at the advice that we give about how to handle mediation. It's highly likely that you will have to issue claim papers so also read around to understand the steps you need to take to bring a small claim in the County Court. It's straightforward but understanding the steps will make you far more confident about what you are doing. Have you started a formal complaint against Hermes and Packlink?
    • Well I'm not sure that you have posted up your new abbreviated version so it's difficult to know what you're talking about
  • Our picks

Locked in car park


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 3360 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

That must have been a lot to digest when you've had a busy day, TLD.

Sorry to dump it all on you like that.

A long day doesn't seem to have dented your eloquence though.;)

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 2.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Or Monty Python-

 

"Go and boil your bottoms, you sons of window dressers. I unclogg my nostrils in your direction you sons of silly persons. Your mother was a hamster and your father smells of elderberries."

Link to post
Share on other sites
Dont hold back, TLD. Let it all out.

 

I have done Noomy but apparantly that post is pending whilst the CAG swearbot downloads an updated word definitions file or something.:D

You have the right to food money.

If you don't mind a little investigation, humiliation, and if you cross your fingers rehabilitation..............

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just want to make it very clear to everyone that TLD has worked his socks off on this case. All the credit belongs with him for getting us so far.

Well him and the YOJIMBO;)

Link to post
Share on other sites
TLD spring cleaning overdue.:D

 

Can't believe how quickly it fills up tbh but space available..

 

 

Could you just clarify something for us please Patma?

 

This killer Court bundle that the clamant have submitted, did the part 36 offer of HALF THE AMOUNT CLAIMED arrive with it? Seems a funny thing to do if so what with all the evidence they have, to only take half when they just have to wait a couple more weeks and get the full amount plus a very handsome costs award......

You have the right to food money.

If you don't mind a little investigation, humiliation, and if you cross your fingers rehabilitation..............

Link to post
Share on other sites
I have done Noomy but apparantly that post is pending whilst the CAG swearbot downloads an updated word definitions file or something.:D

 

You're not in competition with Bryan are you?:eek::lol::lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes they arrived together.:D

I think they might have forgotten to include some of their evidence though.

No cctv footage.....Oh I know that showed up the truth they didn't want us to know and no invoice...... oh yes and that's very dodgy.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes they arrived together.:D

I think they might have forgotten to include some of their evidence though.

No cctv footage.....Oh I know that showed up the truth they didn't want us to know and no invoice...... oh yes and that's very dodgy.

 

Quite obviously the CCTV footage the 'quote' :eek: and the invoice belong in the DEFENCE bundle along with the rest of the stuff which proves they are not being as truthful as the Court might expect..

You have the right to food money.

If you don't mind a little investigation, humiliation, and if you cross your fingers rehabilitation..............

Link to post
Share on other sites
Quite obviously the CCTV footage the 'quote' :shock: and the invoice belong in the DEFENCE bundle along with the rest of the stuff which proves they are not being as truthful as the Court might expect..

Very true.

Aren't they supposed to send a list btw?

Link to post
Share on other sites
whats french for fart, bookie?

 

Fart, noun: Un pet. Plural: Des pets.

Fart, verb: péter.

Conjugates thus:

je pète

tu pètes

il/elle pète

nous pétons

vous pétez

ils/elles pètent.

 

OT, moi? :-D

Edited by Bookworm
Sorry, Patma, it's Noomill's fault!!!! :-P
Link to post
Share on other sites
Very true.

Aren't they supposed to send a list btw?

 

 

Listen Patma.

 

There are two parties:- The claimant and the defendant.

One party has [-----censored by the Cag swear filter----] and [-----censored by the Cag swear filter----] until they [-----censored by the Cag swear filter----] even then they [-----censored by the Cag swear filter----][-----censored by the Cag swear filter----][-----censored by the Cag swear filter----] and still thought they'd blag the Judge.

 

The other one has gone out of their way to be compliant, above board, fair and respectful to the other party and most importantly honest at all times.

 

ps I really think we should take that bit about having heads skewered on stakes on the walls of the Tower of London out the Part 20 counterclaim. It can always go in the Data Protection action or the Human Rights action.:D

You have the right to food money.

If you don't mind a little investigation, humiliation, and if you cross your fingers rehabilitation..............

Link to post
Share on other sites
Listen Patma.

 

There are two parties:- The claimant and the defendant.

One party has [-----censored by the Cag swear filter----] and [-----censored by the Cag swear filter----] until they [-----censored by the Cag swear filter----] even then they [-----censored by the Cag swear filter----][-----censored by the Cag swear filter----][-----censored by the Cag swear filter----] and still thought they'd blag the Judge.

 

Have you had a bad day TLD? :D

The REAL Axis of evil: Banks, Credit Card Companies & Credit Reference Agencies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Funny how anything in French sounds far more stylish!

 

I do prefer the Anglo-Saxon "fart" though!

 

Nearly a thousand years since the Norman invasion an Englishman can still fart, rather than errr...péter!

 

*waves defiant cardboard and string longbow across the Pas de Calais* :-)

Edited by noomill060
mis-spelt the verb
Link to post
Share on other sites
Fart, noun: Un pet. Plural: Des pets.

Fart, verb: péter.

Conjugates thus:

je pète

tu pètes

il/elle pète

nous pétons

vous pétez

ils/elles pètent.

 

OT, moi? :-D

 

Hmmm it's regular is it?

Pretty well sums up my drink fuelled student Youth hostel experience in la belle France.:D

You have the right to food money.

If you don't mind a little investigation, humiliation, and if you cross your fingers rehabilitation..............

Link to post
Share on other sites
Listen Patma.

 

There are two parties:- The claimant and the defendant.

One party has [-----censored by the Cag swear filter----] and [-----censored by the Cag swear filter----] until they [-----censored by the Cag swear filter----] even then they [-----censored by the Cag swear filter----][-----censored by the Cag swear filter----][-----censored by the Cag swear filter----] and still thought they'd blag the Judge.

 

The other one has gone out of their way to be compliant, above board, fair and respectful to the other party and most importantly honest at all times.

 

ps I really think we should take that bit about having heads skewered on stakes on the walls of the Tower of London out the Part 20 counterclaim. It can always go in the Data Protection action or the Human Rights action.:D

If you insist, but I liked that bit.

And after seeing even more porky pies.........:razz: sorry witness statements today, it seemed even more appropriate

Edited by Patma
typo
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just seen that letter! :-x

 

These reptiles clearly need a Farm Slurry Tanker or two of warm ripe Bullock Poop sprayed all over their offices, to cover their entire building, every window and every single BMW in a fetching shade of brown.

 

4%20WH%200355.jpg

 

Once they have been highlighted for all to see by a thick slimy coating of finest West Country steaming plop, then the locals will finally be able to pin-point where the awful pungent pong in that area has always come from.

 

Cheers,

BRW

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Once they have been highlighted for all to see by a thick slimy coating of finest West Country steaming plop, then the locals will finally be able to pin-point where the awful pungent pong in that area has always come from.

 

Cheers,

BRW

Cheers to you too, BRW. what a thought:lol::lol::lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 3360 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...