Locked in car park

[MARTIN3030]

Yes its a concern to many that after so much interest and help,no one has had the decency nor consideration to just even come and say a couple of words.

There have been quite a few instances where some threads have come to an abrupt end when dealings get taken off the forum,often for reasons only known to those concerned.

This is the main reason for having a policy which does not support that angle,without absolute justification.

These things however do not go un noticed,and where we can clearly see an agenda that frustrates or goes against the ethos and purpose of a free site,then we will take steps to see what lessons need to be learned.

Many have their own opinions on whats happened here,and it seems very conclusive that the information began to dry up once certain members made an appearance..............

[MARTIN3030]

I will see if can find out anything-although I did try in December only to be met with a wall of silence.

[MARTIN3030]

The clues and perhaps cruxes are in post #2691

[labrat]

maybe a deal where they agree that op isnt liable as long as he signs a disclaimer not to comment further

[perplexity]

maybe a deal where they agree that op isnt liable as long as he signs a disclaimer not to comment further

 

Was I the only one to notice that since the start of the thread, 813 days ago, the person with the complaint to make never actually posted on his own behalf, let alone the opportunity to thank the members who did?

 

It was all done by proxy.

 

I might otherwise have taken the trouble to comment before the end of it

 

8)

[natalie]

Was I the only one to notice that since the start of the thread, 813 days ago, the person with the complaint to make never actually posted on his own behalf, let alone the opportunity to thank the members who did?

 

It was all done by proxy.

 

I might otherwise have taken the trouble to comment before the end of it

 

8)

 

And? I've posted on behalf of friends who either dont know the site or dont feel comfortable posting. I dont think there is anything odd in that.

[dx100uk]

more like he got poached away by one of our no-win-no-fee ghosts

 

dx

[Conniff]

All the more reason to come back here and brag that this man xxx worked his magic and I won.

[perplexity]

And? I've posted on behalf of friends who either dont know the site or dont feel comfortable posting. I dont think there is anything odd in that.

 

I do not rely on hearsay, and commend to refrain from judging issues with one side of the story told but not the other.

 

When that happens and the eventual outcome with all the testimony heard is not quite the same as expected, I am not so surprised if the result was not as expected.

 

In my experience court cases are lost because of the capacity of the loser to delude himself, not because of the ingenuity of the opponent.

 

8-)

[MARTIN3030]

Well regardless of what we might assume the outcome was or might have been,it doesnt look like we will be finding out.

Conniff makes a good point-if there was a resounding win then its a fair assumption that we would have heard/

If there was a settlement with confidentiality conditions attatched,it still would not have prevented a post here to indicate that.

The other reason of course may be that there are persons who would rather us not know the finer details,in particular in consideration of other instances which mirror this one,and have seen us ask questions.

 

Questions that the people concerned have not been comfortable to respond to.

[mightymouse_69]

This is most unusual.

 

I am interested in JonCris's role.

 

At the beginning of this thread, it appeared to be Patma who was posting on behalf of a friend. Then JonCris joined the thread and proceeded to send PMs to people. At the end of the thread, Patma (despite being the thread starter) appeared to be relegated to the sidelines somewhat. She did not have a copy of the judgment and it was in fact JonCris who had a copy, stating that they were reviewing it.

 

I do not think that the case was dropped and a confidentiality agreement was made. "Fred" lost at first instance. The case was appealed and it is this decision that we are awaiting. According to JonCris, the appeal hearing concluded on the 8th October. JonCris then told us that the judgment was being "considered" on the 12th October.

 

After this post, JonCris did not post on this thread again. Despite being active on the forum for over a month after his last post here. It is also worth noting that JonCris has apparently disappeared despite being a rather prominent member.

 

I think that those who have information they can give on this issue should do so, or at least indicate that there is news - but they can not divulge any information.

[elsinore]

I am interested in JonCris's role.

 

 

Not to mention Toulose le Debt.

 

Els

[Kraken1]

he delivered poor advice, over egged the chances of success and then got pasted in court? You only consider a judgment if you don't get the one you want.

[dx100uk]

This is most unusual.

 

I am interested in JonCris's role.

 

At the beginning of this thread, it appeared to be Patma who was posting on behalf of a friend. Then JonCris joined the thread and proceeded to send PMs to people. At the end of the thread, Patma (despite being the thread starter) appeared to be relegated to the sidelines somewhat. She did not have a copy of the judgment and it was in fact JonCris who had a copy, stating that they were reviewing it.

 

I do not think that the case was dropped and a confidentiality agreement was made. "Fred" lost at first instance. The case was appealed and it is this decision that we are awaiting. According to JonCris, the appeal hearing concluded on the 8th October. JonCris then told us that the judgment was being "considered" on the 12th October.

 

After this post, JonCris did not post on this thread again. Despite being active on the forum for over a month after his last post here. It is also worth noting that JonCris has apparently disappeared despite being a rather prominent member.

 

I think that those who have information they can give on this issue should do so, or at least indicate that there is news - but they can not divulge any information.

 

nail head hit it spot

 

nuff said

 

dx

[hhh_88873]

All that effort hard work by so many good people for it to just fizzle just out? seriously, what a downer.

[MARTIN3030]

Absolutely.

[MARTIN3030]

Thread is continued in part 2 with recent updates from Fred here;

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?320080-Locked-in-car-park-PART-2-updates-from-Fred