Locked in car park

[labrat]

still promising full disclosure if allowed after the case TLD? & patima?

[Thailand]

I was wondering the same. What If the Court doesn't allow them to discontinue? Would that be good or bad for Fred?

[banker_rhymes_with]

Have you a contingency plan should LD/the college/Insurance company drop their court claim at the very last moment.

I would think TLD has this covered. However, for the benefit of the ever present Guests, here's a possible clue:

 

RICHARD DURKIN v. DGS RETAIL LIMITED+HFC BANK PLC, 26 March 2008, Sheriff J K Tierney

 

Was that splattering sound we just heard the involuntary projectile discharge of late-afternoon latté coffee?

 

Cheers,

BRW

[Toulose LeDebt]

 

Have you a contingency plan should LD/the college/Insurance company drop their court claim at the very last moment.

 

Yes.

 

CPR also gives Fred the right to apply for any notice of discontinuance to be set aside. They were offered a chance to discontinue but instead chose to amend the POC and pursue the claim, this might turn out to be a very poor decision by the claimant.

 

Right to apply to have notice of discontinuance set aside

 

38.4

 

(1) Where the claimant discontinues under rule 38.2(1) the defendant may apply to have the notice of discontinuance set aside(GL).

 

 

 

 

still promising full disclosure if allowed after the case TLD? & patima?

 

Oh yes full story and pics NOTW style.

 

 

I was wondering the same. What If the Court doesn't allow them to discontinue? Would that be good or bad for Fred?

 

I think there's a chance with what has been brought to the attention of the Court that discontinuance might not be an option for them. It's to do with the overriding principles......

 

If the Court refused them or accepted an application by Fred that any notice of discontinuance be set aside this is doubly good for Fred.

 

1) It is very much to his benefit that this is heard before a Court and subject to a Judicial decision.

 

2) The Court refusing or acccepting a petition from Fred will imply that like everyone who has read any more than two posts on this thread the Court have seen sufficient proof of what might be tantamount to malfeasance that they believe the hearing is in the best interests of justice. (See 1 above). So yes very good for Fred as it means they are alert to his concerns which lets face it they appear to be as of the latest order.

[Patma]

still promising full disclosure if allowed after the case TLD? & patima?

That promise goes for me too, labrat, there'll be no empty spaces either;)

[Zamzara]

If it's not too cheeky could I trouble someone who knows what's going on for a summary of recent events? You all seem very happy but I'm struggling to follow it after 86 pages.

[kiptower]

the short 1

 

fred parked in the car park

 

barrier would not raise when he tried to leave

 

he spent some time trying to find someone , no luck

 

( barrier was NOT IN THE REST PLACE )

 

after trying everything to find some one he carefully lifted the barrier and drove out ,

 

the college crowd and there legal reps trying to [problem] him for damaging the barrier

 

BUT there is video evidence to show he didnt and actually did as said above,

 

but you really need to read all the posts to get the full picture

 

now all together say " FREE Fred he is Innocent "

Edited August 24, 2009 by kiptower
typo

[Patma]

If it's not too cheeky could I trouble someone who knows what's going on for a summary of recent events? You all seem very happy but I'm struggling to follow it after 86 pages.

Hi Zamzara, Kiptower's done an excellent summary and I just want to add that there will be a certain amount of confusion for now, because there are some sensitive matters that are not being openly discussed at the moment for obvious reasons, but if you can bear with us, all will be revealed asap.

[Annoying Twit]

Who is going to play Fred in the movie adaptation? Everyone always suggests Tom Cruise for themself, but I can see Robert Carlye in the lead role.

[Bookworm]

I'll play the barrier.

 

 

 

 

... I am a mistress of disguises.

[Annoying Twit]

Jack Dee could probably manage the disgruntled expression needed for many of the scenes with PCAD staff using their computers.

[Michael Browne]

I'll play the barrier.

I can't wait to see this scene

 

 

after trying everything to find some one he carefully lifted the barrier and drove out ,

 

[Patma]

My daughter, (Annushka on the thread) who knows Fred, has decided that Mark Addy most closely resembles him. This may be a fitting choice as Mark Addy has already played someone called Fred once.

Fred is not amused as he does rather see himself as a Tom Cruise type, as AT pointed out.

I think Robert Carlye could be a good choice myself.

[Bookworm]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bookworm

I'll play the barrier.

 

I can't wait to see this scene

 

Quote:

Originally Posted by kiptower

 

after trying everything to find some one he carefully lifted the barrier and drove out ,

 

 

 

:lol: Oooo-errr... In that case, you might need someone with a tad more muscle, think Schwarzeneger rather than Cruise...

[Patma]

:lol: Oooo-errr... In that case, you might need someone with a tad more muscle, think Schwarzeneger rather than Cruise...

Think Fred Flintstone could manage it Bookworm?

[Bookworm]

If I have a say in the casting, I'd rather be lifted by Brad Pitt if it's all the same to you, Patma.

[banker_rhymes_with]

Well, I think we all agree that the Muppets should be booked to play LD.

 

In that case, we'll need some real specialists to play PCAD and associates:

 

 

The one in the middle is playing the Geezer from the dubious Security Company at the moment when PCAD realised the mess he made of the quotations and dates.

 

That just leaves us needing somebody weird and theatrical in a wig to play the Judge:

 

 

Sorted, we have the full cast.

 

Cheers,

BRW

[Patma]

If I have a say in the casting, I'd rather be lifted by Brad Pitt if it's all the same to you, Patma.

I'm sure Fred would agree with you, he'd definitely prefer to be seen as a Brad Pitt type than someone from the Flintstones.

 

BRW you've obviously got real casting ability. Who's going to play you?

[Patma]

We need someone good to play TLD as well,mmmm any ideas?

He could always play himself of course.

[kiptower]

hang on we forgot the 2 most important people

 

Van Damm = Patma

 

Steven Segal = TLD

[Patma]

hang on we forgot the 2 most important people

 

Van Damm = Patma

 

Steven Segal = TLD

Kiptower,

Van Damm=Patma........Wrong sex, I'm female.

 

I like the 2 most important bit though, so you're forgiven:lol::lol:

[kiptower]

damm, i got it wrong lol scuse the pun

[Toulose LeDebt]

 

That just leaves us needing somebody weird and theatrical in a wig to play the Judge:

 

 

 

 

Cheers,

BRW

 

Uncanny.

 

 

What about David Mitchell to play a young George in the flashback scenes to a troubled childhood which saw him bullied incessantly during his school years?

 

 

And I'm just off the 'phone to his agent and the PCAD childcatcher has kindly agreed to play himself.

 

[Bookworm]

Kiptower,

Van Damm=Patma........Wrong sex, I'm female.

 

I like the 2 most important bit though, so you're forgiven:lol::lol:

Hmmm... Brainy, strong, good friend... I'm thinking Julia Roberts in Erin Brokovich mode, what do you think?

 

As for Van Damme, what an insult! Is TLD a cokehead in love with himself?... Ok, maybe he is , but for him, I'm thinking Ralph Fiennes or maybe Stephen Fry.

Edited August 24, 2009 by Bookworm
Clarifying...

[Patma]

Lol :lol:

Who's playing you TLD or will you play yourself?