Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I see the poops are still trying to deflect from their own criminality and and abuses by whinging on about raynors buying her council house - now about election registration - anyone who owns a flat or house understands that you dont give up your and your childrens home just because of a new relationship and while we are on about that ..   lets start with When is jenrick being revisited for both lockdown abuses and self admitted (claims estate is his main home - not the property in his electorate or his london property) 'possible (lol) electoral registration abuses as he claimed he was at his estate 'main home' away from both London and his electoral 'home'  - much of which paid for by the taxpayer     Cabinet Minister Robert Jenrick 'breaks lockdown rules twice' by going to 'second home' - Mirror Online WWW.MIRROR.CO.UK Key Cabinet Minister Robert Jenrick drove 150 miles to his 'second home' after urging the nation to remain in their homes in a bid to...   ... perhaps follow with more self admitted lobbying while in a potion where they shouldn't “A few of us in parliament have lobbied the government – and with the help of the Treasury select committee, the chancellor has listened,” John Baron wrote.   Tory MP faces lobbying questions over Treasury committee role | Investing | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Co-owner of investment management firm called for ‘urgent’ post-Brexit changes to City rules at committee meetings     About time labour got in the game and started pressing for these self admitted/bragged Tory abuses were properly investigates.
    • No I didn't I got the dates mixed up.   
    • Sorry about that, TJ. The person who posted it specifically said it was free access. Here's another version of the FT article. https://archive.is/KYrPa
    • Isnt there some indication in there of at least intent to inform arbuthnot? IF he wasn't then it would seem to be Vennells decision to keep him 'uninformed .. Although seems to me if arbuthnot was unaware - he was either incompetent or should have very detailed records of denials. Seems vennells is constantly at the core of all the lying about all these issues though.
    • Paywalled/subscribe HB I'm unaware of the details on this HB but why is it a potential taxpayer burden? Hasn't a judge already ruled port has rights of access - so shouldn't costs be on the private company (South Tees Development Corporation) trying to change established access?     LIVE: High Court updates as CEO gives evidence in access rights row between STDC and PD Ports - Teesside Live WWW.GAZETTELIVE.CO.UK The face-off between the Teesport operator and Mayor Ben Houchen's South Tees Development Corporation continues in the High Court  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

TheCobbettSlayer v NatWest ***WON***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6101 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I take it it is still possible for NatWest to back out of the case, and pay the remainder of your claim in order to avoid revealing their actual costs?

 

 

I believe you have the Wicked Witch over the proverbial barrel. The only way thay can now extract themselves from this is with your cooperation. In my book that costs big bucks.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 415
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I believe you have the Wicked Witch over the proverbial barrel. The only way thay can now extract themselves from this is with your cooperation. In my book that costs big bucks.....

 

Neil, I beleive that if they settle the claim in full the judge will not look too kindly on Paul dragging them of to court as the case will effectively be settled - although I am ready to stand corrected :cool:

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice work Paul.

Two questions here - i) what happens if they don't provide the information ordered without settling up, and ii) Could you go again for an order (without ambiguity) to strike out the defence??

 

Cheers

 

Michael

 

Question 1 - Contempt of Court - Defence Struck out almost without question with the added bonus of someone from Natwest staring at the wrong side of a cell door.

 

Question 2 - If they dont file standard disclosure by Friday the Judge has given Direction that a further application to strike out can be made. I'm not planning on using that at the moment though as I want to see what happens on 10th February.

  • Haha 1

Advice given is either my experience or my opinion and is given without liability. If in doubt, consult a qualified professional.

If you PM me for advice I will only reply in your own thread

 

Never under estimate your ability. I won over £17,000!

For the full story - look here

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/NatWest-bank/17630-thecobbettslayer-NatWest.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Neil, I beleive that if they settle the claim in full the judge will not look too kindly on Paul dragging them of to court as the case will effectively be settled - although I am ready to stand corrected :cool:

 

If they settle the I have no choice but to Issue Notice of Discontinuation as however the choose to word the settlement, they will no longer owe me any money.

 

Incidentally, the Judge did have quite a bit to say on the subject of Conditional Settlements - he's not a big fan. His opinion is that NatWest cannot reasonably attach conditions to a "without liabilty" settlement.

Advice given is either my experience or my opinion and is given without liability. If in doubt, consult a qualified professional.

If you PM me for advice I will only reply in your own thread

 

Never under estimate your ability. I won over £17,000!

For the full story - look here

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/NatWest-bank/17630-thecobbettslayer-NatWest.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Incidentally, the Judge did have quite a bit to say on the subject of Conditional Settlements - he's not a big fan. His opinion is that NatWest cannot reasonably attach conditions to a "without liabilty" settlement.

 

and quite right too, but perhaps a shame as I am sure that they could have "bought" your silence for a reasonable sum of course :D

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whilst the disclosure would be helpful to everyone, the one thing I'm afraid I won't do is martyrdom.

Advice given is either my experience or my opinion and is given without liability. If in doubt, consult a qualified professional.

If you PM me for advice I will only reply in your own thread

 

Never under estimate your ability. I won over £17,000!

For the full story - look here

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/NatWest-bank/17630-thecobbettslayer-NatWest.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just nicked this from Frenchy on the abbey thread

 

#Incidentally in the Daily Mail finance section today was an article that basically said the OFT/FSA has issued a statemnt warning the Banks that their charges are extortionate and in many cases ILLEGAL!!!!!!

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's the link to online version of todays article in Daily Mail.

Banks accused of 'mugging' customers over charges | the Daily Mail

All opinions and advice I offer are purely my own, and are offered without any liability. If unsure seek the help of a licensed professional

...just because something's in print doesn't mean its true.... just look at you Banks T&C's for example !

Link to post
Share on other sites

WOW - WELL DONE!

 

I really do hate Natwest and Cobblers with a passion and would just loved to have been there to see her face.

 

I want you to get your money but I want them to tell us exactly how much its costs more!!!

 

I am currently awaiting allocation and Cobbets are wanting my case struck out and their expenses paid. Idiots!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hate is bit strong and a waste of energy, just remain dispassionate throughout the process. These financial banking monoliths are not interested in the misery they inflict on those that can least afford to pay, so, as they say, 'don't get angry, just get even'.

My advice has hardly any legal foundation whatsoever, however you never know it it might just work!

:cool:

 

NatWest Prelim 07.10.206

LBA 21.10.2006

MCOL 30.10.2006

Acknowledgment of Service 06.11.2006

Offer of approx 50% £2200.00 22.11.2006

Full settlement £4500 received 03.01.2007

Smile settled in full

Barclaycard settled in full

RBS Worldwide settled in full

Lloyds TSB settled in full £750.00

Lloyds TSB settled in Full £275.00 11.04.2007

Lloyds TSB business account £1376.00 AQ filed

Lloyds TSB Business account settled in full 21.05.07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is another way to look at it, the penalty charges are savings and they are paying you 8% on your savings. Now where can you get 8% return on savings? It is just the withdrawal process that is a little complex!

My advice has hardly any legal foundation whatsoever, however you never know it it might just work!

:cool:

 

NatWest Prelim 07.10.206

LBA 21.10.2006

MCOL 30.10.2006

Acknowledgment of Service 06.11.2006

Offer of approx 50% £2200.00 22.11.2006

Full settlement £4500 received 03.01.2007

Smile settled in full

Barclaycard settled in full

RBS Worldwide settled in full

Lloyds TSB settled in full £750.00

Lloyds TSB settled in Full £275.00 11.04.2007

Lloyds TSB business account £1376.00 AQ filed

Lloyds TSB Business account settled in full 21.05.07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is another way to look at it, the penalty charges are savings and they are paying you 8% on your savings. Now where can you get 8% return on savings? It is just the withdrawal process that is a little complex!

 

*snort* aint that the truth!

me against the abbey Paid in full (donation made)

me against the woolwich Paid in full(donation made)

me against HSBC Paid in full(donation made)

 

 

beware the scrapbooker, for she has a long memory and sharp knives :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes - you are right - Just totally miffed at the way they can play the legal system.

 

And so can we if we do it correctly. There is a saying "don't get mad get even".

 

Everybody needs to slow down a bit now and take stock of what is happening. If there is a problem with having so many members it is that there is a lot more information being shared.

 

If I have demonstrated anything it is that it is possible to pursue these claims but it has to be done in a calm and collected manner.

 

It shouldn't be about "playing the system" but unfortunately thats the way the legal system in this country works.

Advice given is either my experience or my opinion and is given without liability. If in doubt, consult a qualified professional.

If you PM me for advice I will only reply in your own thread

 

Never under estimate your ability. I won over £17,000!

For the full story - look here

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/NatWest-bank/17630-thecobbettslayer-NatWest.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Question 1 - Contempt of Court - Defence Struck out almost without question with the added bonus of someone from NatWest staring at the wrong side of a cell door.

 

Question 2 - If they dont file standard disclosure by Friday the Judge has given Direction that a further application to strike out can be made. I'm not planning on using that at the moment though as I want to see what happens on 10th February.

 

Cool, some good options there if they decide to be silly :D

Thanks for that :)

 

Cheers

 

Michael

Please note that the right to reproduce any part of any post I make on this forum is restricted under copyright law.

 

Please see the following copyright statement

Link to post
Share on other sites

And so can we if we do it correctly. There is a saying "don't get mad get even".

 

Everybody needs to slow down a bit now and take stock of what is happening. If there is a problem with having so many members it is that there is a lot more information being shared.

 

If I have demonstrated anything it is that it is possible to pursue these claims but it has to be done in a calm and collected manner.

 

It shouldn't be about "playing the system" but unfortunately thats the way the legal system in this country works.

 

YOU ARE TRULY AN ANIMAL IN MY BOOKS - my friend!

In fact I would have said you were more of a RUDOLPH really in that YOU'LL GO DOWN IN HISTORY!!!;-)

 

Thrilled for you and yours - so where we going then?

;) Boobaby

Please hit the scales if you think I've helped!

Please note that advice given is purely my opinion and should be treated as such.

FAQ’s

http://www.consumeractiongroup.c o.uk/forum/faqs-please-read-these/

HSBC Claim - August 2006 £2,700 paid November 2006

Halifax Claim - August 2006 £4,100 paid December 2006

GE Capital - August 2006 - settled

Log Book Loans - August 2007 - sorted

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great stuff Paul, been away for a bit, family issues, so just catching up on everyones news. You're certainly giving them a good run for their money!!

IF MY COMMENTS HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Don't be like the banks - give a little back

 

 

:D NAT WEST - WON - £4282.36:D

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

CAN ANYONE HELP? MY THREAD IS BELOW

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/halifax-bank/44416-wilkins-halifax.html

 

I HAVE A COURT DATE OF 22 MARCH AND I NEED TO PROVIDE EVIDENCE. CAN ANYONE HELP, ESPECIALLY PAUL WHOS WON!!!!!!! WELL DONE YOU, HOPE IM AS LUCKY.....................;)

HALIFAX: PRE 6 year claim 1991-2006 WON 21/3/07 £2616

CAPITAL 1 - WON 19/3/07 £800.22

CAPITAL 1 - WON 19/3/07 £325.75

AQUA - MCOL 2/3/07 £172.79

ABBEY - MCOL 2/3/07 £261.37

HALIFAX VISA - WON default removal 19/3/07

PARAGON - LBA 11/3/07

CABOT -SAR 26/2/07

ROCKWELL -OFFER 20/2/07

GMAC -MCOL 7/2/07 £189.85

WESTCOT - SAR 25/2/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

This has got me on the edge of seat. Has there been disclosure from Nat West yet, or this is going to 10 Feb, and back court:o

Creation Financial Services--S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 18 Oct

Statements received 28 Oct

PAR sent 30 Oct for £910 Credited £282 as Good will Offer

LBA sent 28 Dec for £730

N1 filled out, but they phoned and settelled in full 19 Jan:D

GE Capital--S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 18 Oct

Capital One---S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 18 Oct

Great Universal(Littlewoods Shop Direct--S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 18 Oct

PAR sent 19 Jan

 

Nat West--S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 26 Oct

Received 27 Oct

Acknowledgement received 28 Oct

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't know what to do for the best now.

 

Emily Duckworth (on behalf of Natwest) told the Court that they were in a position to and would file disclosure by the second deadline of 19th January. I have had nothing from them.

 

I suspect that this is because the Judge told her that the accounting information is still relevant so the disclosure they had prepared is no good because it wouldn't have included it and they have had to go back to the drawing board.

 

Do I make a further application to strike out the defence or do I wait and let the pressure build as 10th February gets ever closer.

 

I'm inclined to wait as a further application would almost certainly result in a costs order against me if it didn't succeed.

 

Any thoughts?

Advice given is either my experience or my opinion and is given without liability. If in doubt, consult a qualified professional.

If you PM me for advice I will only reply in your own thread

 

Never under estimate your ability. I won over £17,000!

For the full story - look here

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/NatWest-bank/17630-thecobbettslayer-NatWest.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...