Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cheshirelad Repossessed


CheshireLad
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5272 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

1st Post for me.

 

If any experienced hands on here have any thoughts or advice I'm all ears.

 

here my situation:

 

repossessed on in July 2008 by Preferred Mortatages, house was on the market already just could not sell in time althought loads of interest.

 

Preferred put the house on the market about 1st August asking £50k less than us. About 2 days later they had 2 offers and a sale when thought 23rd October.

 

 

 

After dozens of phone calls to Preferred (Capstone) this last week the CML & FSA to get a redemption figure and final calculation ( this involed calls to Optima Legal the company appointed to manage the sale of the property) I have been told there is a shortfall of about £3.9k. I've seen the charges they have added as:

  • Estate agents fee's for selling 2% ( a phone call to the Estate agent confirmed they charge 1.25%- the difference £1837.50)
  • £350 change locks, drain down and clean property- we left the property immaculate (photo's taken) water off gas off and keys left for bailiffs
  • £250 management fee
  • £771.75 repossession insurance fee
  • £230 incorrect calculation figure on daily interest in the month of October till date of completion
  • £2041.00 1 x month notice charge for early repayment
  • £190 final repayment charge

Total £5670

 

therefore I reckon they owe me a difference of £1770?

 

As anybody any similar experiences?

 

just trying to rebuild my live now

 

thanks

 

CheshireLad

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Can I just ask was there only one court heariing? Or did you first have a suspended order allowing you time to sell the house?

 

Were you given a clear outline of what the fees were going the be when they took the property? For example a letter or leaflet ?

 

Have you had a full written statement of your mortgage final figures or just a letter.?

 

Very clever of you to take photos of how you left the home- well done I would at least be pursuing that angle.

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also did they provide copies of any valuations they had done of the property?

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also did they provide copies of any valuations they had done of the property?

 

 

 

Serveral court appearances they alway sent someone to try to persude the judge not to give us another chance.

 

They (Capstone) have continue to post letter's to the property. The one the sent after the eviction said what they would do but not any mention of charges.

 

Not seen the valution reports (Opitma legal say there file is closed and any enquiries need to go to Capstone)

 

I spoke to a woman at Capstone late Friday 31st she said put it in writing, I said how will they reply as I only have an email address as they repossessed my home. She said that would be a problem.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately I believe that there are only guidlines on how the company should act during the possesion but if they have breached that then you may be able to appeal to the FOS

 

Unfortunately I am not an expert in this area but I would think you could still send an SAR request for all details of payments and charges and also I would be asking for maybe full terms and conditions of the mortgage.In there it should state their full complaints proceedure.

 

There is a thread on here by Tide turner I think which has some interesting info -a long thread but worth a read ( put the name in the search button at the top)

 

 

I think there is also information and websites to check on Website of the UK government : Directgov there is an arrears and possession section

 

I know you will probably want to forget all this horrible situation but you are right in that every penny counts and you need to check exactly what you owe and what you dont.

 

Hope someone comes along soon who has more knowledge than me

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

it did'nt make any difference even when I told the judge I had a claim against NatWest for £7000 bank charges and that why i was in arrears and because of the test case in the high court i could'nt persue my claim

 

 

Crickey - wish you had found this website earlier.

 

I helped with a similar case on another web site recently and outside the court system the possession was postponed and the claimant got some of the bank charges back to repay the arrears under the new hardship waiver rules.

 

I would stress this was outside the court ruling and only by intervention of the CEO of the bank but it did give the claimant some breathing space.

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been told there is a shortfall of about £3.9k. I've seen the charges they have added as:

Estate agents fee's for selling 2% ( a phone call to the Estate agent confirmed they charge 1.25%- the difference £1837.50) Ask for the actual receipt

 

£350 change locks, drain down and clean property- we left the property immaculate (photo's taken) water off gas off and keys left for bailiffs

£250 management fee I assume by drain down that would refer to the heating system so a plumbers bill, and they would change the locks so a locksmiths bill can be asked for.£771.75 repossession insurance fee

£230 incorrect calculation figure on daily interest in the month of October till date of completion How is this incorrect?£2041.00 1 x month notice charge for early repayment What was i nthe original terms and conditions regarding ERC's

 

£190 final repayment charge - VALID

Total £5670

 

therefore I reckon they owe me a difference of £1770?

 

You need to get a final statement from them and go through it point by point.

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

janus, gizmo111

 

Many thanks for your replies and info,

 

I'am drafting a letter to Capstone challeging all the charges I have mentioned as I believe the charges are excessive.

 

I further believe the property was undervalued i.e. when they instruct a valuer they know its a repo and its value accordingly. It was valued less than we paid it for it 3yrs ago and ok I know prices have dropped but we had improve and added value

 

I closely monitored the sale and even rang enquirying about the property only to be told by the estate agent ' its a repo sale'

 

So once in this position your out of control and at their mercy.

 

I'm have already made a complaint regarding the time it took to obtain a redemption figure 1 week @ £61 per day interest so that was £427 included in the redemption figure

 

The whole system and certainly Capstones does not appear to deal fairly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you kept your previous recent statements? If so you need only ask for recent ones I assume you can send an SAR request for info if they refuse?

 

Did you find the thread by tide turner - I seem to remember there was something about them having to obtain a money order to reclaim further monies after the completion of the sale . But sorry I am only speaking from memory.

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jansus

 

I stopped all mail being delivered to the house and collect from royal mail and got a my normal 12month mortatge statment up to 1st September 2008, thanks for the link to Tide turners thread, yes a fair bit to get though.

 

I intend to fight these ******ds all the way and hope in the light of the present econonic's in the country and the bad press about mortatges company's it may help

Link to post
Share on other sites

How are you takling your bank charges? Do you have a separate thread?

 

I do know of at least 4 or 5 successes under the new waiver guidelines outside court.

 

So for the sake of a few more letters it must be worth a try.

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/repossessions/165261-plan-ease-repossession-rates.html

 

I know this is unfortunately a bit late for you - but at least it is a guide on how the lenders should be behaving.

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

bank charges claim has been acknowledged by Natwest, but as you can imagine this last few months have been a little difficult!! so not don anything further but will do now as i need the money

 

thanks Jansus for comments and suggestions

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bona

 

When you say what does you agreement say, I not sure in what respect you mean? what should I be looking for?

 

basically I had a mortgage with Preferred with reducing %'s over the first 3yrs if I redeemed early, that 3yrs expired on 9th sept just gone. The property was sold following repossession and complete end October. they have charged 1% in the redemption figure.

 

I am also thinking about the amounts I've been charged over the past 12yrs on 3 other mortgages with different companies.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

in my terms My early redemption fee reduced to nothing if I gave a months notice We had a court order allowing us to sell the house they said we only gave them 21days notice as we exchnnnaged and completed within that time frame a barrister argued that they were well aware that the house was to be sold so they had notice as far as I can see the house was sold after 3 tears you should not have had to pay

you can apply under the possession proceedings for the Mortgage company to provide you with an account of what they have done with the mneys theres a special way of doing it they then have to account to the court for what they have done with every penny it might be worth threatening this if they dont answer you

Link to post
Share on other sites

in my terms My early redemption fee reduced to nothing if I gave a months notice We had a court order allowing us to sell the house they said we only gave them 21days notice as we exchnnnaged and completed within that time frame a barrister argued that they were well aware that the house was to be sold so they had notice as far as I can see the house was sold after 3 tears you should not have had to pay

you can apply under the possession proceedings for the Mortgage company to provide you with an account of what they have done with the mneys theres a special way of doing it they then have to account to the court for what they have done with every penny it might be worth threatening this if they dont answer you

 

Bona

 

thanks for your reply, using the court order they obtained against me to obtain information about the charges they have applied, thats something I was aware of and could be useful.

 

I wrote to Capstone via there website on Monday detailing my complaint regarding the charges they have applied to the sale part of the property. but have not had an acknowlegment, so with be phoning today.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have spoken to the OFT, they say mortgage charges regarding arrears penalties etc, are covered under the same test case as the banks.

 

So will get my claims with interest in with the companies concerned and just have to wait

 

Just trying to get confirmation on 6yrs or 12yrs?

 

Can anyone confirm?

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry I dont know the answer to this - just bumping you up

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry I dont know the answer to this - just bumping you up

 

no worry's Jansus, i have found a fair bit out this last week, seems you can claim back against mortgage co's, not covered under the test case but it apparently depends on on some of the wording against the charges, still just 6yrs, the 12years is for redemption/exit charges.

 

Got a bit of response from Cap, not very happy with there inital approach i.e. they telephoned to discuss (want a written reply) and they did'nt even have my letter in front of them. They picked up on the eatate agent cost and told me it did'nt matter what agent charged as Cap had their own fee rate, this definatly can't be right in fairness terms.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should be able to recover the early redemption fee (given that it was not your choice to redeem early. Unfortunately there is no case law on this, as far as I'm aware & different judges take different views on this, but it is certainly an arguable case. Effectively the early redemption means that the bank is protected against losing profits by your repaying early. However, if it goes to repossession, it is no longer a question of safeguarding profits, the security only covers the amount actually owed to the mortgage company, so they don't incur any actual loss- that's why they will give the outstanding balance in court hearings, rather than the redemption figure).

 

As far as the remaining costs are concerned, they are probably entitled to them- apart from errors, of course. So there the ball is in your court to show where they miscalculated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...