Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Could you post up what they've sent please so we can see what the charge is? Cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Charging Order Made Against Parents Property!


TONY7
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5656 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I wish to find out whether a breach and a violation has been committed towards a register of a charging order with a CCJ against an existing debt I have.

 

The CO was made on my parents house who don't own the debt but I do - I have no assets.This is worrying as the creditors have been in contact stating that a CO will be inforce and a repossession order applied - or is it a form of unsecured debt that they are entitled to?

 

How can I get this cancelled If not shall I then get my MP involved to intervene?

 

I look forward to any response.

Edited by TONY7
Link to post
Share on other sites

As I understand it, the creditor is supposed to establish who owns the property from the Land Registry before they can go ahead. If you are not named as owning the property how did this get through the court system?

 

Exactly what paperwork have you had in relation to this charging order?

 

Kind Regards

 

Ell-enn

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for your replies...WOW I can sleep at night now!

 

A charging Order sent from the Land Registery to BOTH parents Mr & Mrs claiming that interest has been made against this property if you would like to object please do so in writing before certain date..DID but was ignored!

Now going to court to set aside CCJ as was redundant and claim SSB!

If compensation route how can I go about this route??

Edited by TONY7
Link to post
Share on other sites

It sounds like the creditor has only registered an interim charge against the property and not a final order. You would be able to defend the action at the final charging order hearing. Get your objections sorted ASAP! How long have you lived there? Do you contribute to the mortgage etc?

 

Do you have grounds to set the ccj aside? what is the situation there?

 

Compensation? I doubt it very much tbh.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Compensation? I doubt it very much tbh.

 

Why not?

 

The parents have a right to have the charging order removed and receive compensation or an allowance for time value and costs etc because the debt is not theirs and neither are they the guarantor.

 

The creditor has 'tricked' the court into believing it was making a charging order on the debtors own property, otherwise it would not have been granted. In that case, the debtor has a valid complaint.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There isn't a charging order on the property at the moment. From what I gather it is just an interim charge which has registered an interest in the property. This will soon be discharged unless the creditor can prove that the OP has a beneficial interest in the property.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with Tifo - there should NOT have been any CO of any kind

and besides a conversation stating that they (Solicitors) will apply for a repossession order sounds alarming to me - so I am currently seeking legal help and by god will I seek compensation if this is wrong!

 

SEE MESSAGE BELOW!

Edited by TONY7
Link to post
Share on other sites

Tony, from the info YOU have provided there seems not to be a charging 'order' in place at the moment.

 

My understanding is that the creditor has registered a caution against your parent's property in the form of an interim charge. there will be a subsequent hearing which will allow a judge to decide whether or not to make the order 'final'. Usually, it will be very clear that the property is not yours and trhe inteerst in the property will be discharged. The only time where there is the possibility that a charge could be made final is if the creditor can prove that you have a 'beneficial' interest in the property of significant value.

 

 

take a read:

 

National Debtline England & Wales | Debt Advice | Factsheet 15 Charging Orders In The County Court

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm - there should NOT have been any CO of any kind and besides a conversation stating that they (Solicitors) will apply for a repossession order sounds alarming to me. But I have JUST been on the phone to the court for a CCJ hearing and was suggested to write in and complain so the Judge will look at it!

YES there is a CO against this property as was stated as it was confirmed!

Link to post
Share on other sites

this is a somewhat confusing thread, is there any chance you can post a copy of the order of the court minus the personal details?

 

I am wondering whether you have been misinformed about this ?

 

I have to agree with sequencis post above, as something just doesnt ring true here

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately NO one attending a hearing on 25 July 08 but I sent a letter objecting to the CO but was overruled and additional costs added to the debt. Personal issues arose.

 

I am going to write again to the court objecting that a CO should NOT have been made & I shall give plenty of reasons.

 

Any letter templates would be helpful on this matter...

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to apply to the court on the n244 form asking for the charging order to be discharged citing Section 3(5) of The Charging Orders Act 1979 stating that you are not the owner of the property. You should also supply evidence to prove that fact.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There was an application hearing 25 July 08 at Bradford. It was NOT feasible to get to bradford as WE leave in Kent. But still an objection letter was handed in but overruled!

 

On the B136 CO Application Notice:

Registering a Restriction Against the Land.

Addressed both to:

Mr & Mrs.

 

'If a court order is made against a person who owns the property with you and not you personally then the above restriction still applies. The court order only affects the interest in the property of that person but the applicant can still make this application'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Application only and that WE did NOT attend hearing!

 

'Also Written Notice of disposition was given the creditor at solicitor being the benefit of an interim charging order on the beneficial interest of Mr made by Bradford CC'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...