Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Morgan Stanley/Goldfish/Barclays... Who do you request a refund from??


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5659 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

We've just realised that my partner took out ppi with his morgan stanley card over 6 years ago, and its never been worth the paper it probably wasnt written on.

 

He was in a fixed term contract for six months of the first year of the credit card, and then was self employed.

 

He's never made a claim and didnt even realise that it was still on the card because he's not used it for over 3 years - he's just been trying to pay the damn thing off... and getting nowhere!

 

Barclaycard have now set up an axa ppi plan for him without his permission, he hasnt even received a letter or terms and conditions saying that it was setup and what it covers... they've just added 30 odd quid a month and he's livid.

 

On doing the research we've figured that the norwich union ppi that my partner requested was should be stopped when he went self employed, as a minimum - but it never was - and really, it should never have been put on in the first place. They asked him what he did, he told them and they told him to tick the box anyway.

 

He says he had the MS people on the phone and they helped him fill out the form - and they basically alluded to the fact that it would be more likely that he would get a gold card with a higher limit if it was taken out. They also told him that it would cover him if he was made redundant - now - a fixed term contract after more than 2 years employment is technically a redundancy - but he was told he could not claim! Even at that point, he was told to keep the ppi as it would cover him for sickness... but he was self employed, and they knew about that too because he told them when he couldnt make a couple of payments!

 

Anyhoo - we want to try and get them to refund the ppi, but who do we talk to? Is it Barclaycard? And if yes, how likely is this to be given? Have we got a fight on our hands, or will they just give in cos they've brought the debt cheap from goldfish??

 

We've sent off a SAR today by giving it in to the bank clerks at our local branch. (this is the second request - they reckon they never recieved the first one even though I've got a recorded delivery that says it did get there!)

 

Will this get them shirty if I now try and talk to them about a F&F offer - or we're heading for an IVA and default.

 

:) any advice would be greatfully appreciated.

 

Laurel

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

We've just realised that my partner took out ppi with his morgan stanley card over 6 years ago, and its never been worth the paper it probably wasnt written on.

 

He was in a fixed term contract for six months of the first year of the credit card, and then was self employed.

 

He's never made a claim and didnt even realise that it was still on the card because he's not used it for over 3 years - he's just been trying to pay the damn thing off... and getting nowhere!

 

Barclaycard have now set up an axa ppi plan for him without his permission, he hasnt even received a letter or terms and conditions saying that it was setup and what it covers... they've just added 30 odd quid a month and he's livid.

 

On doing the research we've figured that the norwich union ppi that my partner requested was should be stopped when he went self employed, as a minimum - but it never was - and really, it should never have been put on in the first place. They asked him what he did, he told them and they told him to tick the box anyway.

 

He says he had the MS people on the phone and they helped him fill out the form - and they basically alluded to the fact that it would be more likely that he would get a gold card with a higher limit if it was taken out. They also told him that it would cover him if he was made redundant - now - a fixed term contract after more than 2 years employment is technically a redundancy - but he was told he could not claim! Even at that point, he was told to keep the ppi as it would cover him for sickness... but he was self employed, and they knew about that too because he told them when he couldnt make a couple of payments!

 

Anyhoo - we want to try and get them to refund the ppi, but who do we talk to? Is it Barclaycard? And if yes, how likely is this to be given? Have we got a fight on our hands, or will they just give in cos they've brought the debt cheap from goldfish??

 

We've sent off a S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) today by giving it in to the bank clerks at our local branch. (this is the second request - they reckon they never recieved the first one even though I've got a recorded delivery that says it did get there!)

 

Will this get them shirty if I now try and talk to them about a F&F offer - or we're heading for an IVA and default.

 

:) any advice would be greatfully appreciated.

 

Laurel

 

Hello and welcom Laurel,

 

I see you are moving in the right direction in sending your SAR, who did you sent it too?????

 

The person that you go after is the person that applied it,

 

Once you get your sar you will have more information and we can help you.

 

I don't understand your statement regarding the f&f settlement ? iva or default??? can you explain please:-D

If any of my posts are helpful, please feel free to click my scales. All information is given as my opinion only, based on my own personal experiences. I have no legal training, but have educated myself in aspects of consumer legislation. My motto "NEVER GIVE IN, NEVER SURRENDER", THERE IS A WAR ON YOU KNOW

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI,

 

Well the people that applied the ppi in the first place was morgan stanley... but they dont own the card or the debt anymore. So I've just sent it to barclaycard today.

 

As for the F&F settlement - the card balance stands at about 4500 and its getting ridiculous. its been at about that level for the last 3 years. In fact, if anything its been going up and up and we're not using the damn thing.

 

I calculated that 6 years unwarranted PPI is about 2500 - and I know that barclays havent paid the full amount for the whole debt, so was going to offer them 1000 F&F with the intention of going up to 1500 if they argue that its too low.

 

But the fact of the matter is - if they dont accept, my partner is going to be forced to enter an IVA - he earns about 10k a year, what with his other creditors, barclaycard are going to be getting about 900 back after all the iva people take their chunk out.

 

The house wouldnt cover the debts we owe if we sold now, so they'd get nothing if they bankrupted us - and I can provide the funds to make this offer... fingers crossed they'll see that they wont get away with the PPI [problem] with MS and will realise that 1000 for a debt that is actually only really 2000 is a bloody good deal.

 

What do you guys think??

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...