Jump to content


Harry May

Default Notice Re-Issue

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1812 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Thanks PB, a lot of what you say above is slightly confusing to little old me I have to admit :???:

My opinion is based purely on my very small knowledge, I have no experience or links to anyone with such experience and therefore your opinion and advice is valued!

 

I have to agree, a typo is a minor technicality for the courts to actually make the decision that the agreement is therefore unenforeable however, if the debtor is not provided with the necessities that is afforded to them then surely this represents a prejudice issue? My case for instance does not involve a typo on a DN, no DN was present at all and there is a termination that resulted from this prejudice business error made by the creditor. So what reasons are DJ's giving of late for allowing another DN to be issued on an agreement that a reasonable person would deem none existent?

Lets say after a default on an account the creditor recovers the goods... No DN and no TN. This is the same senario only using a different entitlement afforded to a creditor after a valid DN.

Can the creditor return the goods, then issue a DN and a TN for the agreement to become capable of enforcement? To a reasonable person, if the goods were recovered or a TN was received either way one would believe the agreement is over and that the creditor no longer wants it to continue.

What I'm trying to fathom is what reasons for a failed defence is the DJ likely to return based on other cases?

 

Thanks

C

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Any update


VT against welcome finance costs returned

Refund against jetline travel

Caital one settled 6th November

N1 Filed Yorkshire Bank 26/09/06

£677+£172int.+£80Chgs acknowledgemment of claim recieved 29th/09,Defence recieved 27th October Recieved AO 30t hOctt Settled in Full 8th December

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ignore post

Edited by chez262

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Returning to this subject once again and the original post :

" If a default notice is invalid due to penalty charges or overstated amount or not allowing 14 days to remedy breach should that be enough to strike out their claim. And if so can the claimant then re-issue a new default notice correcting the wrongly stated items, even if this is two years later!"

I find myself in the same situation, HOWEVER, the o/c has reissued ( reprinted/conjured up/edited ) a default notice with exactly the same dates as the original ( 2009) but this time asking for the arrears and not the whole balance to be repaid. Surely this amounts to fraud and deception, as the original DN was defective they now have tried to correct their mistake. Account terminated and assigned during the default notice period to rectify in any case. Current dca is now asking for proposals to repay on the strength of this altered dn, how should I respond?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In that case it's still a bad DN, Griffin. As they issued it retrospectively it's obviously impossible to remedy by the given date.

Staple it to the envelope it arrived in, noting date of receipt and sit on it (and the original) in case they take you to court.


PLEASE NOTE... I AM MOST SORRY BUT I HAVE VERY LIMITED AVAILABILITY AT THE MOMENT DUE TO EXTREME PRESSURE OF WORK - IF YOU REQUIRE URGENT HELP ON YOUR THREAD AND ARE GETTING NO RESPONSE PLEASE HIT THE TRIANGLE FOR SITE TEAM ASSISTANCE. ELSA XXX

 

Please check out my BLOG for the quick guide to debt threats - it has all the info & letter template links you need to get started on your journey of TAKING CONTROL. :roll:

 

All opinions are my own based on research. I am not legally qualified, if in doubt please consult a legal expert.

Hope this has helped or made you smile. Keep your chin up, you're among friends now! Elsa xxx

Please click the *star* of any CAG member who has helped you .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The latest DN was sent by the current chasing DCA who had asked for a copy of the DN from the OC. To all extents and purposes this DN now looks compliant, however it is not the same as the one I originally recieved.

It seems that certain american bank who issued loads of dn's like mine asking for the full balance, are now trying to put right their mistake. Convincing the DCA that they are still in the wrong maybe a different story!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm also struggling to figure out if I have a defence or not. NatWest defaulted a loan in 2012 and we went to court, but the DN was defective (amount wrong, less than 14 days to resolve). The judge struck it out and as if by magic, a new default notice arrived in April 2013. It all seems to be correct but there is the small matter that the agreement was in effect, terminated when court action took place. Also, my access to the linked bank account/loan was unilaterally terminated in 2009 with no notice when arrears first started.

 

 

I have a trial date in 3 weeks time and keep finding conflicting information so I don't know if it can be successfully defended on this basis or not. Please advice, thanks

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?336532-RBS-taking-me-to-court-*Struck-Out*-**-New-claim-issued-by-RBS-**/page18

Edited by Andyorch
Posters link added

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm also struggling to figure out if I have a defence or not. NatWest defaulted a loan in 2012 and we went to court, but the DN was defective (amount wrong, less than 14 days to resolve). The judge struck it out and as if by magic, a new default notice arrived in April 2013. It all seems to be correct but there is the small matter that the agreement was in effect, terminated when court action took place. Also, my access to the linked bank account/loan was unilaterally terminated in 2009 with no notice when arrears first started.

 

 

I have a trial date in 3 weeks time and keep finding conflicting information so I don't know if it can be successfully defended on this basis or not. Please advice, thanks

 

Please start a new thread for your case.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...