Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The world's largest economy grew less than expected but rising inflation may delay a rate cut.View the full article
    • Hello, Following the submission of my defense, last night I received an email from DCBL indicating that the claimant intends to proceed with the claim (I've attached a screenshot of the email for reference) along with the N180 directions questionnaire. I'm unsure how they obtained my email, but I suspect it was through the courts' form when I completed the Acknowledgment of Service. This email almost slipped my attention. I have also today received a letter from court to state they have received my defense.  It appears they are requesting an online telephone hearing with the court. Could you please advise me on the necessary steps I should take at this point? Thank you for your assistance. Letter-Email 25-04-24.pdf N180 - Directions questionnaire (Small Claims Track).pdf
    • Default Amount £9237.88, all this started in 2006 Admitted debt £9075.65 Weightmans added £1515.01 immediately they became involved, no explanation The Statement shows when Marlin bought debt in May 2011 £10439.25 Their statements, not received until the SAR, are based on this. Cabot deducted £1515.01on their statements in January 2019, again did not find this out until SAR. Weightmans added in  2007 after the CH1 etc was confirmed by the court £741.50, made up of Process server fees, Court Fee (they tried for bankruptcy), Solicitors fee and Land Registry fee. Unspecfied Legal costs were added by Marlin in March 2015, again I did not know this until statements received with SAR I had been paying monthly, without exception until December 2018. I am minded to take the property charge, CH1 amount ,deduct all my payments and the subsequent fees, and request/demand a refund on the final payment made? I consistently disputed Weightmans balances, but they never responded. I also told Mortimer Clarke/Cabot that I disputed their amounts.  
    • Just follow this link and have read of some threads so your familiar with the process https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/347310-legal-n180-directions-questionnaire-small-claims-track/#comment-5178739
    • Sorry,  I'm not familiar with terminology.  Direction questionnaire is what I've seen online as next step. Witness statement: I haven't gone that far, that's why I put the question marks.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

CHAPS- Is £20+ a fair charge?


Guest NATTIE
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6241 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Yes £20 is fair for a service. There is quite a lot of administration goes into a CHAPS payment at both ends. This is a service for which the banks are entitled to charge for and make a profit, a healthy one at that.

 

Some accounts will offer this facility for free if you shop arround.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

£20 is fair for the work involved, often people ring up customer services to see why a chaps hasn't arrived (when it was sent 5 minutes before), Cust Services then speak to Payment Clearing/Processing, so we have now had the branch cashier, the customer service assistant, and the payment clearing helpline, deal with the same query within 10 minutes.

 

The fraud & Anti Money Laundering checks that have to be done on these transactions, that are their for larger amounts, are not a case of press enter and let it go. So the AML staff have a look, then payment processing allow the transaction, and pass that to the clerk responsible for downloads.

 

Downloads for all the major banks take place at intervals throughout the day, often inaccurate data is recieved, wrong a/c no's etc, thus taking more time, and a member of staff to correct this and find the account, or return the payment, where all the above would be repeated again!

 

Hope this makes sense, and explains why the fee's are higher than some would like.

 

SOME Solicitors pay £5 as this is an agreement between them and their business banking provider, this is usually because they are normally House Purchases, and send a lot of business through, for HBoS, they also input the data.

 

Chaps is the UK's Clearing House Automated Payment System,

Foreign Transactions are Telegraphic Transfers, these require even more work than above- mainly due to the global money laundering problems.

 

(I Used to work for HBoS Payment & International Services)

AB123uk

 

IF MY COMMENTS ARE USEFUL, PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES!

 

Halifax Staff Current Account WON

Lloyds WON

Yorkshire WON

Halifax Staff Visa WON

 

 

If CAG Helped you..... Why not help CAG!

Click Donate at the top of the forum!

Oyster- I fought the Lloyds will have it's mark in history- have you downloaded your Official Charges Track?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The most telling paragraph from the above article:

"

The true cost of arranging a same-day CHAPS transfer from one bank to another is estimated to be around £3, thanks to large-user discounts of around 90%. (Transfers between your accounts at the same bank normally don't attract this fee.) Indeed, if the bank sending the payment is itself a member of the CHAPS Clearing Company Limited, then the effective marginal cost is close to zero."

 

That might be the cost to Clearing House Automated Payment Systems, howeve the 'AUTOMATED' is that it automatically goes through them, not through the banks!

AB123uk

 

IF MY COMMENTS ARE USEFUL, PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES!

 

Halifax Staff Current Account WON

Lloyds WON

Yorkshire WON

Halifax Staff Visa WON

 

 

If CAG Helped you..... Why not help CAG!

Click Donate at the top of the forum!

Oyster- I fought the Lloyds will have it's mark in history- have you downloaded your Official Charges Track?

Link to post
Share on other sites

When working for a payroll company in a previous life we used to send upwards of 100 chaps payments a day. Our bank Drummonds @ RBS charged us £2.50 per CHAPS transaction. Someone somewhere is definitely making money on this!

12-03-07 Halifax Received £1800

05-06-07 Halifax II Small Claim Served for £2503

Capital One - Won £768

Halifax Credit Card - Won £756

Link to post
Share on other sites

ab123uk, a good post and does explain why some payments are delayed, ie, additional security checks not being completed by a cut off point.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Only time I've used CHAPS has been to withdraw money from my egg savings account and thats only been at times where I didn't have a reliable (read that not overdrawn) bank account for deposits to go into so I've used my savings and account and withdrawn it as soon as a current account was set up. I paid £25 for two transfers. One was £830 and other was £130 but both times I needed the money in an account I could actually get at whereas I don't have a card for my egg account

 

For same day processing its worth the charge and strikes me as being an extra service rather than a penalty charge. After all you have a choice. If you don't want to be charged make the transfer with BACS. Takes longer but its free. If you must have the money there and then use CHAPS.

All my posts are made without prejudice and may not be reused or reproduced without my express permission (or the permission of the forums owners)!

 

17/10/2006 Recieve claim against me from lloyds TSB for £312.82

18/10/06 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent

03/02/07 Claim allocated to small claims. Hearing set for 15/05/07. Lloyds ordered to file statement setting out how they calculate their charges

15/05/07 Lloyds do not attend. Judgement ordered for £192 approx, £3 travel costs and removal of default notice

29/05/07 4pm Lloyds deadline for payment of CCJ expires. Warrant of execution ready to go

19/06/07 Letter from court stating Lloyds have made a cheque payment to court

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree to a point but you cannot transfer £100,000 online, most banks have a limit of £10000 where it is going externally from the bank. As joncris pointed out solicitors get charged £5. Some things will change when faster payments come in later this year where transfers online will be a matter of hours rather than 3 days with BACS at the moment

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

The thing with solicitors is that, because their client accounts hold lots and lots of money, they're valuable clients to the banks and therefore can negotiate a better tariff. Probably, my local taxi company pay less when one of their taxis needs a new tyre than I would, because they'll get a discount because of the other work they give to the garage.

 

I have read a bit about the replacement for BACS. One thing I haven't seen is what it will cost. Given that BACS is free (to personal customers), people are expecting this new system to be free. I doubt this will be the case though, and I think we can expect to start paying for BACS payments, say 50p or thereabouts.

 

You can't have your cake and eat it, as the saying goes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

faster payments will cost nothing but i cannot comment on much more because it is not until November that it will happen.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats understandable Nattie, its going to be interesting to see how the new payments sytem works, and how the banks implement this!

AB123uk

 

IF MY COMMENTS ARE USEFUL, PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES!

 

Halifax Staff Current Account WON

Lloyds WON

Yorkshire WON

Halifax Staff Visa WON

 

 

If CAG Helped you..... Why not help CAG!

Click Donate at the top of the forum!

Oyster- I fought the Lloyds will have it's mark in history- have you downloaded your Official Charges Track?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jon, here is a little bit of news, the faster payments method is going to be........FREE. It also affects standing order payments as well which is FREE. However I still believe the cap is on payments of £10,000.00 or below.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
The fraud & Anti Money Laundering checks that have to be done on these transactions, that are their for larger amounts, are not a case of press enter and let it go. So the AML staff have a look, then payment processing allow the transaction, and pass that to the clerk responsible for downloads.

 

Like most things in this country, the EC brings in ML rules, and the administrators add in the most detailed procedures they can (like the hoops you have to go through to open an account).

 

When you think about it, most drug, sex racket, and other criminal money is CASH. These people want to get it into the banking system - that's where the money laundering should be concentrated. In my business we have had to register and get approved under money laundering regulations - yet we give out money, we don't take it in.

On some things I am very knowledgeable, on other things I am stupid. Trouble is, sometimes I discover that the former is the latter or vice versa, and I don't know this until later - maybe even much later. Read anything I write with the above in mind.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jon, here is a little bit of news, the faster payments method is going to be........FREE. It also affects standing order payments as well which is FREE. However I still believe the cap is on payments of £10,000.00 or below.

 

Prices haven't yet been set, but the cap is going to be higher than £10k.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest NATTIE

I think you need to re read the thread this one is about transferring from say you to me not accessing the money just moving it to someone else

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be really honest with you, I don't care what anyone says. Why should I have to pay to get access to MY OWN MONEY!? Bottom line!

 

 

This thread isn't about access to your money, it's about a service that the banks provide allowing you to move that money in a secure manner from on account to another.

 

Chaps is guaranteed and irrevocable once it's been released. The banks pay a fee to be a member of Chaps and they charge for this service.

 

I don't agree with the high fee but they do have a right to charge for it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

given that it is a negligible / nil cost to access and transfer money say from one bank account to another (at the same bank) via the secure internet, isn't the faster payment system based on this? - you could be paying a vastly reduced price for a transfer in hours rather than days, and I've heard that the DWP will be soon intiating a same day service for benefits, at no charge to the claimant (other than the tax payer:rolleyes: ), it's being trialled in some small part of the UK as we type.........but......it will only be for emergency payments:???:

Halifax - paid out without getting to court - £250 WON - no intention of going, stated too costly!!

Halifax no 2 account - paid out without a fight - (by mistake, £1650 - should have been £1200 - had to pay some back)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You'd be surprised. To be a full member of CHAPS, it costs the banks somewhere in the region of £100k. Plus the up keep of secured servers, backups and all that. However regardless of what they pay out it's very profitable for them. Especially when you consider all the estate agents paying money away each day for completions.

 

Transfering money from one account to another in the same bank is no cost at all, it's a simple book entry.

 

Read here for more information on faster payments:

 

APACS - New Technology and Development - Faster Payments in the UK

or if you're really interested:

 

gtnews: login

I believe the 2nd link might require sign up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im sorry, I think people are getting confused. If you want your money- go and withdraw it.

If you want a sameday transfer, to another bank- pay for it- the staff that do It need to be paid, and if you read this thread in full, you'll understand it.

 

On my more specialist issue;

If you want a sameday transfer from BoS to BoS Business Banking, Halifax to BoS (old a/c's), BoS Business Banking to Halifax- yes, they are all part of HBoS, but these accounts are operated on different platforms, so no, its not a book entry- the costs are the same to the bank as they would be for an external payment.

 

Just in Case anyone wonders about the above-

Halifax & Bank of Scotland Accounts:

 

Halifax/BoS Retail A/c- a normal account, like me & you have, has a sort code, a/c no. and D/ or 2/ roll number.

 

BoS A/c (non migrated) very rare now, if any at all, has a sort code and account number.

 

HX/BoS Business Banking- has sort code, a/c no.

 

Sorry if Im stressing, but If people read the full thread, people have an Idea.

 

but to Summarise:

 

Bank, pays membership and sets up CHAPS.(FEES)

Customer, goes to branch or rings bank to arrange CHAPS (STAFF WAGES)

Processing Team process payment (STAFF WAGES)

Anti Money Laundering Checks (STAFF WAGES)

Payment Sent (FEES TO CHAPS -clearing house automated payment systems ltd)

 

plus the cock ups with wrong details that people say are DEFINITELY RIGHT, ooh, thats wrong!

 

I had had such enough of working for a bank, but believe me, this profit they make of CHAPS isnt 100%, yes they do make, but come on, use common sense and look at the bigger picture!

:(

AB123uk

 

IF MY COMMENTS ARE USEFUL, PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES!

 

Halifax Staff Current Account WON

Lloyds WON

Yorkshire WON

Halifax Staff Visa WON

 

 

If CAG Helped you..... Why not help CAG!

Click Donate at the top of the forum!

Oyster- I fought the Lloyds will have it's mark in history- have you downloaded your Official Charges Track?

Link to post
Share on other sites

A lil advice for anyone that can use it.. I work for Halifax, and had requests to do a Chaps transfer and understandably had a few customers shocked at the charge.

 

So the way round this I've found, if it's for less than £5000, is to do them a bill payment - using a current account, a bill payment can be set up for the ATM Machines, aloowing a transfer of up to £5000 which is processed like a standing order, but done on request.

 

Not perfect, and takes a couple of days to go through, but it often works well for people transferring money who want to avoid the charge.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest NATTIE

scooby make sure you Private Message Dave or BankFodder, just one of the site rules on here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...