Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

has anyone claimed back PPI from YCC


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5653 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I bought a car from YCC in jan 2004. I couldnt meet the payments so gave the car back 12 months later. I am now paying off the huge debt left from it to Go Debt £35 per week. Which i cant afford. I have a copy off my contract with them which said i took out nearly £2000 in PPI. I remember being told that i have to have the PPI or i would not get finance. So being desperate i signed the form.

Has anyone managed to claim the PPI back from YCC, or am i wasting my time.

 

:confused::confused::confused::confused::confused::confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Koolkidz,

 

Welcome to the PPI forum there a lots of folk here who will help if they can:)

 

I bought a car from YCC in jan 2004. I couldnt meet the payments so gave the car back 12 months later. I am now paying off the huge debt left from it to Go Debt £35 per week. Which i cant afford. I have a copy off my contract with them which said i took out nearly £2000 in PPI. I remember being told that i have to have the PPI or i would not get finance. So being desperate i signed the form.

Has anyone managed to claim the PPI back from YCC, or am i wasting my time.

 

Firstly let me post some information from the FSA register...link here...

 

FSA Register

 

Search conditions

 

 

FSA Firm Ref:

Firm name: yes car credit

Post code:

Match level: Best

Currently authorised:

Matches 1 to 3 of 3 records.

 

 

Search again

 

Firm namePost codePrevious/Trading As namesStatusNon-FSMA Registration

 

Direct Auto Finance Insurance Services Ltd

 

RH12 2RG Accepted Car Credit, Direct Auto Finance, Yes Car Credit No longer Authorised

 

Direct Auto Finance Ltd

 

RH12 2RG Accepted Car Credit, Yes Car Credit Appointed Representative - Former

 

Direct Auto Financial Services Limited

 

RH12 2RG Accepted Car Credit, Direct Auto Finance, Yes Car Credit

 

 

Appointed Representative - Former

 

You can check out which company it is and hit the red link on the left for more information.

 

I have a question reference your post.

 

Is Go Debt a Debt Collection Agency?

 

Was the original PPI for £2,000 taken out with yes car credit in the original agreement?

 

 

I remember being told that i have to have the PPI or i would not get finance. So being desperate i signed the form.

 

For claims before 2005 and the FSA ruling from which campaign

How to tell if you’ve been mis-sold PPI

Quick check: were you mis-sold? - How to tell if you’ve been mis-sold PPI

 

It would appear from the FSA register that YCC were not authorised until 2005 and your loan was 2004 do not let this prevent you from putting in a claim.

 

give us some answers please and we can proceed from there.

 

aa;)

Edited by alanalana
post tidied up

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi koolkidtz

 

i might be able to end this for you now

 

if you have the agreement to hand, check the following

 

any deposit paid by you, was it used to pay for some of the ppi, insurances etc and not for the car.

 

ycc are well known for this and a perfect defence as it is unlawful

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello koolkidz,

 

I see Go Debt are a debt collection agency.

 

PO BOX 371

Cardiff

South Glamorgan

Cardiff

CF10 3WN

 

It would appear that Yes Car Credit (who are really hot on pressurised selling believe me from experience) have sold on the debt to a DCA namely Go Debt.

 

You can still stick here to reclaim Mis-sold PPI but have a look at this forum for the DCA issue.....

 

Debt Collection Industry

 

This may help fight of the DCA issue.

 

More advice will surely follow:)

 

aa

 

 

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is imperative that no monies should be paid to Go Debt. This business is run illegally - outside of the rules set by dca regulations and trying to obtain monies by deception as Yes Car Credit finance agreements are no longer enforceable.

 

Car Credit Complaints

 

 

John A.

Edited by John Atkinson
Link to post
Share on other sites

John,

 

It is imperative that no monies should be paid to Go Debt. This business is run illegally - outside of the rules set by dca regulations and trying to obtain monies by deception as Yes Car Credit finance agreements are no longer enforceable.

 

Can you please explain how they are no longer enforceable and which element of your link refers to this please.

 

aa

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ill try to explain my reasoning on this

 

a lot of these micky mouse car finance agreements fail well below what is expected of the consumer credit act.

 

first thing is when you buy an item, say a car on finance, you pay a deposit. that deposit gets deducted from the price of the car leaving a total ammount payable,

 

if that deposit is used to pay for insurances,ppi, etc. it is not being used for the purpose for which it was intended. that way the finance company can screw you at the max ammount of interest on the full value of the car, extending the time to pay it off.

 

the next trick they use is the aceptance fee.

say the acceptance fee is £100

they then add that to the total ammount of credit,

therefore you are paying interest on the acceptance fee which was not part of the original credit ammount

 

this has been delt with in the high court

 

WILSON V FIRST COUNTY TRUST

 

i have used these arguments myself in court

 

ime sure someone like surfacegent would like to comment on this

Link to post
Share on other sites

John,

 

 

 

Can you please explain how they are no longer enforceable and which element of your link refers to this please.

 

aa

 

 

There are a number of flaws within many early YCC finance agreements. Where PPI was sold to a customer the breakdown of this within the contract was written wrongly. It was only post 2005 where new contracts were drawn up that were correct.

 

YCC will not challenge any of these cases within a court environment as without doubt they will lose. In 100% of cases that has reached a court date YCC have settled out on condition of the consumer signing a confidentially agreement. The finance contract was then void and outstanding debt written off.

 

John A

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello all,

 

from postggj,

 

ill try to explain my reasoning on this

 

a lot of these micky mouse car finance agreements fail well below what is expected of the consumer credit act.

 

first thing is when you buy an item, say a car on finance, you pay a deposit. that deposit gets deducted from the price of the car leaving a total ammount payable,

 

if that deposit is used to pay for insurances,ppi, etc. it is not being used for the purpose for which it was intended. that way the finance company can screw you at the max ammount of interest on the full value of the car, extending the time to pay it off.

 

the next trick they use is the aceptance fee.

say the acceptance fee is £100

they then add that to the total ammount of credit,

therefore you are paying interest on the acceptance fee which was not part of the original credit ammount

 

this has been delt with in the high court

 

WILSON V FIRST COUNTY TRUST

 

i have used these arguments myself in court

 

ime sure someone like surfacegent would like to comment on this

 

From John A

 

There are a number of flaws within many early YCC finance agreements. Where PPI was sold to a customer the breakdown of this within the contract was written wrongly. It was only post 2005 where new contracts were drawn up that were correct.

 

YCC will not challenge any of these cases within a court environment as without doubt they will lose. In 100% of cases that has reached a court date YCC have settled out on condition of the consumer signing a confidentially agreement. The finance contract was then void and outstanding debt written off.

 

John A

 

I hand over to your greater knowledge on dealings with YCC. I am sure you will assist koolkidz to a successful outcome I will follow with interest;)

 

aa

 

Koolkidz you out there?

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi koolkidz

i see the put the 160 quid deposit on the insurances

thats a no no

 

give it a few days for some one to go over the agreement

 

i think go debt are in for a nasty surprise

when yoy get more replies, you need to be sending a letter to go debt putting the debt into dispute

that will be 35 quid in your pocket per week not go debt.

 

like i said, wait for more replies first

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...