Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • a 'witness' to it not arriving till the 15th is sadly immaterial too. regardless to the above anyway, the PCN remains valid. 
    • Hmm yes I see your point about proof of postage but nonetheless... "A Notice to Keeper can be served by ordinary post and the Protection of Freedoms Act requires that the Notice, to be valid,  must be delivered either (Where a notice to driver (parking ticket) has been served) Not earlier than 28 days after, nor more than 56 days after, the service of that notice to driver; or (Where no notice to driver has been served (e.g ANPR is used)) Not later than 14 days after the vehicle was parked A notice sent by post is to be presumed, unless the contrary is proved, to have been delivered on the second working day after the day on which it is posted; and for this purpose “working day” means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or a public holiday in England and Wales." My question there is really what might constitute proof? Since you say the issue of delivery is a common one I suppose that no satisfactory answer has been established or you would probably have told me.
    • I would stand your ground and go for the interest. Even if the interest is not awarded you will get the judgement and the worst that might happen is that you won't get your claim fee.  However, it is almost inevitable that you will get the interest.  It is correct that it is at the discretion of the judge but the discretion is almost always exercised in favour of the claimant in these cases.  I think you should stand your ground and don't give even the slightest penny away Another judgement against them on this issue would be very bad for them and they would be really stupid to risk it but if they did, it would cost them far more than the interest they are trying to save which they will most likely have to pay anyway
    • Yep, true to form, they are happy to just save a couple of quid... They invariably lose in court, so to them, that's a win. 😅
    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

'Error' in Full and Final Settlement Offer


weejay6000
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5609 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have several Credit Cards and a £15000.00 Unsecured Personal Loan from NatWest. Due to many different factors I was unable to keep up with my repayments. I was relieved when I managed to set up Reduced Payments for all my Creditors.

 

 

Last week I received a letter from 'Capquest' stating they would be taking over my Natwest Loan. They said they would accept my £2.50 monthly payment but also offered me a 'Full and Final Settlement' of 0.72% of my balance quoting a final figure of £108.08. I couldn't believe it!, what a great offer:). I thought the catch was the timescale, since the letter they posted out was dated 4th and I ony had until the 10th to accept this offer and make payment. Luckily a friend wrote me a cheque and I posted it by Recorded Delivery, so I know it was received on time.

 

 

On the 9th I received a letter from Capquest stating they had made an error with their previous letter and the offer intended was 72% of the balance giving a final figure of £10800.00. They apologised and said 'the decimal had been put in the wrong place'. I was gutted!!! :( However, they still cashed my cheque for £108.08.

 

 

I am now wondering if they can do this, since they made me an offer, I accepted it and now they've gone back on their word. Any help would be greatly appreciated from this fantastic site.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Thanks for the reply. Yes, I've still got the letter with the offer of 0.72% a final payment of £108.08.

 

However, this morning I've received another letter from Capquest saying again that the offer of 0.72% was an error and they've enclosed a cheque for £118.08 addressed to me. They say it's a refund of my payment plus £10 for postage & costs.

 

Any further thoughts would be greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would be tempted to return the cheque to them, stating that as far as you are concerned the matter is now closed :D

 

You've got to feel sorry for them, they cannot even get their monkeys to put the decimal point in the right place!!

jaxads

 

Halifax - £2281, successfully refunded all charges after LBA letter & telephone call.

Have been offered the difference between the £20 and £12 charges from Capital One -- am sending LBA for remainder.

GE Money - Received settlement of £441, being total charges requested. No interest though.

CCA'd Bank of Scotland / Blair Oliver Scott to produce CCA Agreements on two Credit Cards - well in default, although still chasing payment!!!

EOS Solutions "ceased action on account" on behalf of a friend.

 

All in all, quite busy at the moment and enjoying every minute of it
:eek:

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The offer was an unambiguous offer comprising first a reference to '0.72%' and second '£108.08'. If the letter was the product of a typo there were several by the use of a superfluous '0.' in the percentage figure, and the incorrect position of the decimial point and the omission of '00' for the pence figure in the monetary figure.

 

I take the view that the collection of errors could not be treated as one simple error or an attempt on your part to take an advantage.

 

Further still, the cheque offered in settlement was not from you but a third party. No doubt the cheque drawn by the third party was to secure your release from the debt. That cheque was accepted.

 

In my view the creditor has compromised the claim by the issue of the offer, the acceptance of it by way of offer from the third party and the encashment of the cheque. I would not return the cheque nor obviously would I present it. I wold simply retain it very safely.

 

x20

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys for the replys, much appreciated.

 

I think I'll keep hold of the cheque Capquest sent me for the time being, I definately won't cash it.

 

I'll just wait & see what happens now, if I receive anymore letters etc. I'll keep you informed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Subscribing, hee hee, you lucky thing xx

Halifax CCA letter sent 3 May

2 x CL Finance letters sent 3 May

Halifax and CL letters received 6 May

Halifax responded with valid CCA, but need to query default

CL Finance failed to provide CCA by 2 July - letter sent

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree, return the cheque and tell them you consider the matter closed. Your situtation is improved by the fact they cashed the cheque. You can tell they are concerned about this. I have never heard of a DCA returning money like that plus postage costs when you have an outstanding debt with them.

 

Subscribed

Link to post
Share on other sites

There was a thread earlier about this seemingly wonderful offer. At the time I said if it looks too good to be true then it certainly is.

 

That said I think you have them by the short and curlies,

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know one of the posters said to hold onto the cheque but personally I would not feel happy about doing this, I would much prefer to return it and telling the matter is closed. In view of the fact that a cheque is valid for six months are you sure you may never be tempted to cash it? I also think by not returning it Capquest will probably think that you have fallen for it and will cash it at sometime.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I also think by not returning it Capquest will probably think that you have fallen for it and will cash it at sometime.

 

By not encashing the cheque will draw this whole thing out for the lifetime of the cheque and frustrate the creditor in being pro-active even though the ball is in their court. Being able to produce is incontrovertible evidence of non-presentation.

 

x20

Edited by surfaceagentx20
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Just to keep you updated guys.

 

I've still got hold of the cheque Capquest returned to me but now 7 weeks later I've received a letter from their solicitors 'HL Legal' demanding arrears of -£108.56 ... yes, that is a minus sign.

 

There is no address to reply to HL Legal only Capquests. Shall I just ignore this letter, any thoughts on this latest development please??

 

wj6000

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to keep you updated guys.

 

I've still got hold of the cheque Capquest returned to me but now 7 weeks later I've received a letter from their solicitors 'HL Legal' demanding arrears of -£108.56 ... yes, that is a minus sign.

 

There is no address to reply to HL Legal only Capquests. Shall I just ignore this letter, any thoughts on this latest development please??

 

wj6000

 

Just shows what a bunch of Cretins you are dealing with. Wait until they start ringing you demanding immediate payment of this negative balance and start threatening you with the usual sh!t about Courts, Baliffs etc etc etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

I could be wrong here, but.

Send a letter stating account is now closed per your agreement letter from them AND their encashment of your settlement cheque dated xxxxx.

Also, ask when you can expect their kind gift of £108. 56 as it'll come in handy over Christmas:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...