Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good Evening, I've got a fairly simple question but I'll provide some context incase needed. I've pursued a company that has operations in england despite them having no official office anywhere. I've managed to find a site they operate from and the papers there have been defended so I know they operate there. They've filed a defence which is honestly the worst defence ever, and despite being required to provide their witness evidence, they have not and have completely ignored the courts and my request for copies of it. I'm therefore considering applying to strike out their defence on the grounds the defence was rubbish and that they haven't provided any evidence for the trial. However, it has a trial date set for end of june, and a civil application wouldn't get heard until a week before then, so hardly worth it. However, my local court is very good at dealing with paper applications (i.e ones that don't need hearings, and frankly I think they are literally like 1-2 days from when you submit it to when a Judge sees it. I'm wondering if I can apply to strikeout a defence without a hearing OR whether a hearing is required for a strikeout application.   Thanks
    • I have just opened another bank acc with lloyds (i have a few already) After doing some research they may have some relation to tsb or be apart of the same group will this cause me issue if my salary is paid into my lloyds account? Also, if the debts do go into default and nothing is paid then after 6 years it all goes away? As the DCAs cannot do anything? I do want to start paying in like 3/4 months or do you advise I leave it if it goes into default? again sorry for all the questions, i am just processing everything
    • one reply only  follow post 2 of letter of claim <<clickme link. dx
    • Sorry, I got confused  Yes, it states all three   Thanks, 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Lbl trying to repo my car


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5647 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone

 

New to this forum and have been reading some of the interesting stories regarding this company. i am also a victim of this company and they are now trying to seize the vehicle due to non payment. The agreement itself was signed in the car park of a supermarket and not on any premises and the loan was made by bank transfer. i have repaid in excess of 75%of the original loan amount and unfortunately stopped payment due to difficulties.

 

i have since reading all your stories revisited my BOS which contains erros like wrong address detail(Just the house number). it also contains witness statement signed by the sales rep and not an independent witness. The BOS was dated 26 january and registered at the high court on 31 Jan. i have also since reading this thread referred this case to stephensons solicitors.

My main questions are, is this agreement legal given that it was signed by the sales rep as a witness instead of an independent witness and secondly as it was conducted in a car park? The high court date stamp shows 31st January which was a sunday. Does the high court open on Sunday?

 

Even though i have referred this to stepehnsons, i need to be clear as to what my position is in this case and if anyone else including northern star could suggest any other solicitors that has been successful at dealing with these people.

 

Please Help

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi JACOBSR Welcome to CAG,You have come to the right place and there are lot`s of people who will point you in the right direction.

check this link out http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/log-book-loans-bills/163752-i-beat-lbl.html

Read this thread

 

Cheers B4E

NEVER TALK TO A ---D.C.A ON THE TELE[PHONE UNLESS YOU`RE D.M.D

GET EVERYTHING IN WRITING

 

http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w289/diskmandave/CAG-LIBEL.jpg

forum-rules-please-read

ConsumerWiki - A-Z Index

PLEASE DONATE TO CAG,EVERY LITTLE HELPS

--------------------------------

Any Advice given by me is based on solely on my experiance or opnion. I have no Legal background.

If i have helped in any way please feel free to click my scales

Thank You blue4ever:grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm claiming myself against them for their charges, but on the bright side for me, I've cleared the loan and they've confirmed this and given me back my V5. Just got a fight on my hands to get the charges back now.

 

What I would say is to "hide" the car, as they will take it away! You'll then be hit with additional charges of around £350 and have to pay these in addition to any arrears before you can get your car back.

 

But if they can't find the car .......

 

Best of luck to you. You're in the right place for help and advice.

jaxads

 

Halifax - £2281, successfully refunded all charges after LBA letter & telephone call.

Have been offered the difference between the £20 and £12 charges from Capital One -- am sending LBA for remainder.

GE Money - Received settlement of £441, being total charges requested. No interest though.

CCA'd Bank of Scotland / Blair Oliver Scott to produce CCA Agreements on two Credit Cards - well in default, although still chasing payment!!!

EOS Solutions "ceased action on account" on behalf of a friend.

 

All in all, quite busy at the moment and enjoying every minute of it
:eek:

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi JACOBSR - any updates??

jaxads

 

Halifax - £2281, successfully refunded all charges after LBA letter & telephone call.

Have been offered the difference between the £20 and £12 charges from Capital One -- am sending LBA for remainder.

GE Money - Received settlement of £441, being total charges requested. No interest though.

CCA'd Bank of Scotland / Blair Oliver Scott to produce CCA Agreements on two Credit Cards - well in default, although still chasing payment!!!

EOS Solutions "ceased action on account" on behalf of a friend.

 

All in all, quite busy at the moment and enjoying every minute of it
:eek:

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi everyone

 

just a quick update on my battle with lbl. i have now passed this matter to a solicitor to deal and i guess its the same one that every body recommended. However last week wednesday, the repo guys visited my premises to try to repo the car. They actually managed to sneek into the car park without the knowledge of the porters but fortunately were spotted by him trying to repo the car. i was immediately alerted by the ported and i decided to comfront them. A huge comfrontation erupted within the premises as a result of them trying to take the car and me preventing them from doing so. Luckily, i spotted an opportunity and drove away with the car before they were able to take it outside of the car park. During this confrontation i was assaulted by the repo guys who were quite intimidating. Any how, once i drove off i decided to hide the car for the night some where else. The next morning, i went to report the assault at the police station and on my way back i stopped at a petrol station and as i was filling up at a petrol station, i noticed a van pull up next to the car and thought it to be suspicious. i immediately went back to the car and the driver of the van whom i recognised from the night before started to shout at me to see if i recognised him. i completely ignored him and got into my vehicle and tried to drive away, he decided to try to block me in but i wasnt having any of that. i found a gap which i used to drive past him and a chase ensued. This van continued to pursue me through the busy rush hour and also breaking red lights in order to try to catch me but unfortunately for them, i was in a much faster car and they were not aware that i was a cross between Lewis Hamilton and James Bond. Eventually, i managed to shake them off, however, i recognised that this was quite a dangerous position to be in were someone an innocent member of the public could have been killed during this pursuit.

i have since reported this incident to the police and they have mentioned to me that they will be in contact with the animals who were involved.

 

i have since hidden the car and informed my solicitors of this incident but does this mean that if i was driving along on the road and i was spotted, then i will have a repeat of this dreadful street chase? What can be done to prevent these kind of comfrontation.

 

The Bos is disputed as it was witnessed by the sales rep instead of an independent witness. Any advice will be appreciated ........Please Help

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is dreadful !!!

 

Hope the car is now well hidden!!!

jaxads

 

Halifax - £2281, successfully refunded all charges after LBA letter & telephone call.

Have been offered the difference between the £20 and £12 charges from Capital One -- am sending LBA for remainder.

GE Money - Received settlement of £441, being total charges requested. No interest though.

CCA'd Bank of Scotland / Blair Oliver Scott to produce CCA Agreements on two Credit Cards - well in default, although still chasing payment!!!

EOS Solutions "ceased action on account" on behalf of a friend.

 

All in all, quite busy at the moment and enjoying every minute of it
:eek:

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Incidentally, those recent documents some were asked/made to sign that apparantly obilgate them to cease their legal action action against LBL in 'return' for recission of the loan agreement & security thereon were deemed by counsel to have a mere '10%' chance of standing up in court. In legal terms, that is saying there's no way on gods earth any court in the land would accept the terms of those agreements.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...