Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • if i remember rightly, long ago in one of the first drafts of the old proposed gov't overhauls, there was a listing of recommended 'charges' that inc wrong reg = £20. some PPC's implemented such changes in advance. then later as it looked increasing likely the new code was never going to be implemented after it's 1st review and another set of codes was to be debated they all quietly revert back .......... dx
    • Potentially it may not even get sold on? Just the default left for 6 years then gone? but if it is sold on ill get a letter from the DCA which is the notice of assignment? Sorry what is the different between a default notice and a default cal marker? yes, i may try and work arrangements out with the OCs after the breathing space but I'll see my circumstances then thank you again for all your help and patience, I really appreciate it and apologies If i am too fast or repeating myself.
    • receiving a default NOTICE (forget simple default cal markers) does not mean it will get sold on... OC's very very rarely do court themselves.  if it does you would receive a Notice of Assignment from the debt buyer/DCA.  as for reduced payment if it remains with the OC and they issue a DN, no harm in trying but lets get all your ducks inline first. dx  
    • okay thanks do you know how long it will take for it to get to the DCA or could the OC try and issue a CCJ? even though it's unlikely also for example would the OC agree to a reduction and a small payment over a super lengthy period of time if agreed? Rather than go through chasing apologies again for all the questions, just trying to understand all the possible scenarios.  
    • Currently - "the maximum daily price at 100p / kWh for electricity and 30p / kWh for gas – keep in mind that's a lot higher than the Ofgem Energy Price Cap, so if you can't afford prices to increase further, you're probably better off sticking with a protected tariff such as Flexible Octopus." Octopus Tracker is a product of our labs, available now to customers through our beta programme. Octopus Tracker is a beta product. Some things may not work the first time, and installations and processes may take longer than we'd like. Third party tech like In-home Displays won't always work, and on occasion data issues with smart meters can take significant time to fix or prevent things from working at all.   Copied straight from octopus   Feel free to shove it somewhere else    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Arrow/Shoos claimform - old MBNA debt - settled by Tomlin - drydens now write saying pay us not Arrows?


toxicdebt
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 837 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Well if you are considering accepting their Tomlin then the above is really irrelevant?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 508
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Well only you can decide that matter Toxic...as we have previously discussed a restriction is meaningless on your home and if you feel that you should proceed then that's your choice.

Just to clarify they are allowed to submit a WS (even though they are too late now) they are not allowed to verbally support it...they are debarred from oral evidence.

 

You could get a completely different DJ this time and if he goes with the old " on the balance of probabilities " line then you could lose.

 

Taking all into consideration including the TO if you go that way you pay inc costs.If you proceed you win and you get costs. If you proceed and lose you get a CCJ plus further costs and probably a restriction.

 

Something for you to deliberate on

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Responded to your PM Toxic.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wise decision Toxic....

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update: They want me to pay their Summary Judgment costs - I have refused as they lost. Their SJ application was thrown out and costs were awarded to me then rolled over to the full hearing.

 

Their solicitor has replied saying that as as no costs award was on the general court order for the full hearing date she doesn't believe they were awarded to me. How do i prove it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whether they were or not awarded to you makes no odds they most certainly were not awarded to them as they lost...or has she forgot?

 

What does it state on your " general court order for the full hearing date " Toxic ?

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Update... My Tomlin has been in effect since November last year and I've made the agreed payment each month. Ive just checked my credit file and under Global Arrow each month since they bought the debt in 2012 has been listed as 'US' (Unknown Status). However in January this year it is listed as 'D' (Defaulted). The same in Feb and March this year too.

 

It also shows the wrong amount owing. I'ts showing the defaulted MBNA debt amount without what they added on etc.

 

Can they do this seeing as I have a Tomlin Order considering I have not missed a payment since it was set up last November?

 

Can I sue them? :lol:

 

My credit file states this is due to drop off my file in August next year - 6 years after the date I defaulted with MBNA. If this is the case should I not rock any boats and just wait?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tomlin Orders have no connected/effect with CRA files...the debt still remains...but you can query the amount if that incorrect.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy. I think Ill just keep my head down and let the clock wind down to next August when it says it will drop off my file under the 6 year rule. Could they open it up again after that point?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends if you default on the Tomlin Order...but it should drop off after 6 years as normal.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Well after two years of paying my £20 each month I've had a credit paid into my bank from "S'SMITHS CLT LENDE FILE CLOSED". This arrived The day after my standing order payment was paid out to "ARROW GLOBAL"

 

Does this mean they have closed my account and written the balance off?

 

I'm a tad worried as this time last year I was emailed by Shoesmiths asking me why I had not returned Arrow's annual income and expenditure form. Arrow had (yet again) sent it to the wrong address. Once I explained that nothing had changed they were fine and my payments under the Tomlin order continued until now.

 

Is it possible they have again sent an annual assessment form to the incorrect address and then applied to have the Tomlin removed so they can proceed to court?

 

Would I be informed by the court if something like this had happened?

 

Im unsure what - if anything - I should do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you would be informed Toxic...try to get hold of Arrow and find out why the SO has been cancelled.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rang Shoesmiths who told me to ring Arrow as they were no longer collecting this debt on AG's behalf and have closed my account. I asked why they had not informed me of this in advance as I was now One months payment missing. They said they were not required to, all they had to do was return my money. I wonder what would have happened if I had just done nothing. Would Arrow have had grounds to revoke the Tomlin?

 

Anyway... I then rang Arrow who searched for my account and eventually discovered it had no 'collection assignment company' (whatever that means). I was given their bank details and told to send the monthly payments electronically until Im assigned a new collection agent. I asked if I could just set up an SO direct to Arrow and was told no pay electronically every month and, wait for further correspondence. What are they up to?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Simply a change of " collection assignment company " or in other words... a Solicitor that is willing to deal with them.Its not uncommon and most payments after litigation run through a Solicitor rather than direct to the clients account...I have yet to get to the bottom of why this happens...but I will:-)

 

And yes one missed payment on a consent can be considered a breach...but unlikely to be enforced given the Judgment Creditor is at fault..

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting. Ive not has any correspondence from a new assignee as yet but did send January's payment direct to AG with my reference number on.

 

However, if they dont allocate a new solicitor within a reasonable time would that give me reason to approach the court for a breach as it is a major inconvenience to try to remember to manually pay them each month rather than by the agreed standing order?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont think refusing payment would be considered a breach of the Tomlin Order Toxic...more of an irregularity and inconvenience to yourself.Will Arrow update you when something firm is in place ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The guy at AG said I would be informed when a new assignee was in place. However Im getting a tad worried now as Ive had another payment into my bank from Shoesmiths today, equivalent to one months payment. Thats two so far both titled "S'SMITHS CLT LENDE FILE CLOSED".

Im guessing I should make another payment to AG now? Seems a bit strange that Ive got another refund from Shoey's just after sending one to AG. I might give AG another ring.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not ideal is it...was there anything in your Consent with regards to missed payments?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

It states they can lift the stay if I miss any payments and that if we cant agree the monthly payment after each 12 month review either of us can ask the court to assess how much should be paid.

 

Ive just rang AG and they now tell me the last payment from Shoey's was in November which would mean two missing payments, so I suspect thats what the second refund is. I've forwarded the money over to AG just now.

 

They guy on the phone (very pleasant manner) said that once my account is taken up by one of their "financial partners", Id have to fill an assessment form in to determine how much I could afford to pay each month. I reminded him that there is a Tomlin Order for a set amount in place which can be reviewed once a year and both parties had to agree. I'm beginning to think they are trying to get me to pay more. Ill wait and see what happens after (if) its assigned. At least If they try to hike my monthly payments up (currently 112 years left to go before its paid off at my current rate) I can go back to the court. My circumstances are the same as they were back in 2013 when the Tomlin became affective.

 

I suppose I'll just have to remember to make a payment to AG electronically each month until then.

 

Maybe AG are trying to sell the debt on and get rid of me. I cant imagine many "financial partners" would want to administrate this ongoing as it cant be worth anything to them. Im paying very little each month, but its all I can afford and they settled ( snatched my hand off) for it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely agree Toxic...no new assessment forms to be completed...just keep the payments going.....can you not put a reminder in your smart phone or PC ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...