Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • OK, you made a bad mistake by outing yourself as the driver. But that's not fatal.  It's a case of one argument unfortunately down, but lots of other arguments still standing.  Chiefly that this is a scam site with an invisible line separating two car parks in order to entrap motorists. 1.  As LFI says, send a SAR to MET so you can get your hands on their original invoice.  Invest in a 2nd class stamp and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office. 2.  About six months ago, when the tsunami of cases at this site started, lots of Caggers contacted the CEO of Starbucks  https://www.ceoemail.com/s.php?id=ceo-82463&c=Starbucks UK-General Manager  Starbucks then contacted EuroGarages which seems to be another company in their group, and which runs the Stansted branch, and which got the invoice withdrawn.  However, after one, two, 10, 20 of these cases Starbucks seemed to get fed up.  However, it's only an e-mail, and surely worth a shot.  Lay it on thick about being a regular Starbucks customer but on this occasion you found the branch closed, and it is completely unfair to be charged £100 for briefly stopping in a car park while trying to use Starbucks. The main point here though is that MET are very, very wary of starting court cases for this site.  If they don't do court there's no reason to pay them.
    • Thanks jk2054, you were indeed correct. I've received the court order requesting documents and the witness statement etc. which I will read through and begin to compile shortly.
    • Find out what these WhatsApp scams are and what to do if you receive a message from a scammerView the full article
    • You need to send Met an SAR and they will send you the original PCN .. However all their PCNs appear to be the same and as the car parks are on airport land the keeper is not liable for the debt. Only the driver is responsible. But there are other considerations which can be enough for you to win. Poorly lit signage; scam site, it's a penalty; as well as problems with the contract. So you have a lot of things going for you as well as Met are not keen to take well defended cases to Court.  
    • The brand, which runs 216 shops as well as franchised stores, is looking at ways to save cash.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lombard - Lease Purchase Agreement


Missy Allen
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5196 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hope someone can help me with this.

 

My husband had a Lease Purchase Agreement for the purchase of a trailer. We paid on a monthly basis and received monthly invoices for VAT purposes.

 

In April this year my husband stopped trading and sold his wagon and was looking for a buyer for the trailer. We knew that there would be a shortfall on the finance. The trailer was actually sold in June (there was a lot of messing about from Lombard).

 

We never received any invoice documentation from Lombard regarding the outstanding finance or the sale of the trailer. We should get a VAT Invoice for the whole amount of the outstanding finance and a VAT credit note for the sale of the trailer.

 

We kept asking and asking (always told that they had been requested) until August when we were informed that we were not eligible for a VAT invoice!!!!!

 

We instigated a complaint which has not been dealt with properly. Lombard informed us that the only way we would get a VAT invoice is to prove Lombard delayed the sale of the trailer.

 

I have spoken with HMRC who state that Lombard cannot enforce the outstanding debt without an invoice as that is the evidence they would rely on in Court.

 

We have followed the complaints procedure and now sent a letter to the Managing Director by Recorded Delivery and apparantly has 21 days to respond.

 

Lombard seem to insist that a letter is sufficient enough to prove to the Inland Revenue that we owe the money but as we are VAT registered and so obviously is Lombard we do require an invoice/credit note.

 

Does anyone have any advice or knowledge?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

You seem to have done pretty well on this so far, It would be interesting to see the 'final' response.....if it is not to your satisfaction, then I suggest getting the Financial Ombudsman involved....i'm not knowledgable on these Lease Purchase agreements....however as you have said it may not be enforceable !!! keep us posted as to what happens...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I have to wait for the MD to get back to me and if the complaint is still not dealt with satisfactorily then I have to go to the Finance & Leasing Association and then the Financial Ombudsman. If in the meantime Lombard decide to pursue me for the money at least I can prove that I have done my best to try and resolve the matter!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

I would be very interested in your uptodate position as we are experiencing major problems with Lombard. we were a new start up business and they released money to a supplier without our knowledge and are now chasing us for the money, which is considerable. we couldnt start the business as we didnt get the machinery. We too wrote to the MD after months and months of writing to Bernice Howard but they just keep changing the story and contradicting themselves, we also tried the FLA but they are like a chocolate teapot and bend to Lombard - please update on this, would be keen to know how you have got on - best of luck :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi bobtailmad

 

My current position is as follows:-

 

I have tried contacting the FLA but they will not accept my claim over the telephone and advise me to make a complaint over the internet. I have made 3 complaints so farand not one has had a response.

 

Lombard told me that the Financial Ombudsman cannot get involved in this matter due to the amount of the credit but they are regulated by the Financial Services Authority.

 

Lombard say they have currently "reviewed" the file but I have to agree with you they do contradict themselves, back track and actually make things up.

 

Lombard have stated that they do not have to supply me with VAT documentation because they defaulted the agreement - yet I only followed their advice! They have admitted they have given me the wrong advice on one occasion but it happened on many occasions. Originally I was told on many occasions that the VAT documentation would be with me shortly and the delay was due to a backlog of repossessions etc. 6 months later they decided that I could not have the VAT documentation because they defaulted the agreement. I believe this is because the debt owed to Lombard by me is then less if they do not supply VAT documentation.

 

I received a letter a couple of days ago (which had to be authorised by the MD's office) which was completely incorrect and said that I was refusing to pay the outstanding amount which is completely false.

 

I will, however, keep you updated. I will be writing to the FSA regarding Lombard's conduct. I have had a really bad experience with NatWest and RBS (all three are the same company) and I had a bit of success by perservering with RBS who supplied invoice factoring to me.

 

Just out of interest have you got any written and signed documentation? Have you got any correspondence which you could rely on? If want to post the full story I will see if I can help at all - but I'm not promising - this is Lombard after all!!!

 

Good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I wasnt a lady I could tell you with various colourful characters on the keyboard what I think of Lombard. It seems ok for them to make large error, admit them but expect others (inc us) to still pay. We never even had the goods and couldnt trade, after remortgaging the house, changing mortgages and paying a redemption fee to do all of this, we will be really really in a difficult position if this case goes their way. Why should we pay them a bean when they have admitted their errors? Yes we have a very good file of corkers, al submitted, just hope the judge we get isnt rushing either onto the golf course or something else, we need someone that is interested. cross fingers for us, havent got a date yet but just want closure. The FLA were fuzzy and never returned our calls but they just couldnt enforce anything even tho they agreed it was a mess up. take care, likewise if we can help/support you, thats ok, be positive - oh by the way, we had VAT invoices thro after we told them the company was closed down and we hadnt traded, when we rang no one seemed to know what they were for.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

Re registered here, but thought would put an update on here. We eventually won our case - Lombard paid our deposit back and withdraw their claim against us. So v v v v good news but for the stress and hassle they put us through, it is outrageous and the FLA are a total waste of space and were not breaking into any sweat whatsoever to try and help, v much on the banks side. Hope anyone else who has had problems with them, just keeps going and if you know you are right, like we did,you will be ok. They just try and wear you down. We could have lost everything all for nothing and their arrogant people. I love the fact that this bank is now in big poo makes me smile everytime

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...