Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi and thanks It looks like they ticked all the boxes to me but I'll try and upload the notice. I was wondering if a witness to late delivery might be considered proof - I'm assuming they posted it as normal but Royal Mail stuffed up delivery. If not then they're really saying it just has to be posted within 12 days of the incident, regardless of when it is received. Annoying! edit ok thanks Honeybee here's my 2nd (actually 3rd) attempt at anonymising, copying and uploading the notice! Sorry about the state of it - I sat on it while distracted by my dog 🙃 pcn front.pdf pcn back page.pdf
    • ROFL - dont get upset just because someone (quite a lot of someones) dont want smart meters - well unless you get paid for it .. in which case ...   I assume you haven't been with Octopus long enough to be on one of the very long fixed price tariffs they offered before the prices went bonkers .. and that you dont use your electricity in the evening/lunch time if you think the 'agile type tariffs are good value .. let alone worth installing a smart meter for - high price a good disincentive for an evening cuppa eh? Let alone all your computer/tv etc time in the peak price evening or lunch time. - and boy do those peak prices instantly hammer your bill when those Russian and middle eastern issues kick off.   I would only have considered a smart meter if solar panels had been an option for me - but roof is oriented completely the wrong way. Oh - and My opinion hasn't changed since the smart meter trials 40 years ago, because neither have the issues (well not enough) but I'm happy for you. Be happy for me.
    • Hi. I'm afraid I've had to hide your post with the pdf files to keep this anonymous for you. You've left the PCN reference number and your car reg showing. Could you edit that and repost please? HB    
    • Well naturally if you want to maintain your outrage, and retain something to bitch about, then arguing about the level of your fixed monthly DD is the way to go. You are of course perfectly free to ignore the easy solution.
    • His financial situation isn’t great, and the landlord has made lots of things up. The things he’s put isn’t true at all. My friend did tell the full truth with incoming and outgoing, I helped him fill in his form and he checked bills etc. to make sure it was right. His wage is ok, but not as good as the landlord thinks it is,  and he doesn’t have anything spare. How much are they likely to take from him? Should he send any reply?  the letter just says to take the court letter with him. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help with Nationwide


fizzle
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1872 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi I was hoping I could get some help in drafting a letter to Nationwide

 

I have a Flexaccount with nationwide which I didn't use and it had a zero balance with no overdraft. A couple of years ago, somehow they attached a direct debit for a service, which I didn't authorise, obviously when it came around it bounced, this happened twice before I noticed and received letters. Long story short I failed to dispute it while charges were racking up and ended up totalling about £270 worth of charges, which I paid.

 

While it would be nice to get the charges back, What I really would like from them is to remove the default they have put there, I have only just recently discovered that while the rest of my file is clean, the default they have put on there has caused me issues :(

 

Could I use the sample letter and just add a bit asking for the default to be removed?

 

Any help would be really appreciated!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should also be covered by The direct Debit Guarantee.

 

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/ombudsman-news/27/27-directdebit-guarantee.htm

 

and you should make a complaint uder ths. Do they say that you did autorise the payment? What is the story.

I think that if it is their fault then you are looking at return of charges, default removed and an extra payment for the cheek.

I don't uderstand why you paid it?

 

More info please

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello!

 

got a response from nationwide, I've scanned it as its too long to type!

 

links here:

 

http://img374.imageshack.us/img374/652/nationwide13ra.jpg

http://img98.imageshack.us/img98/2008/nationwide20oe.jpg

 

 

Also here is the text from the original letter which I modified slightly from the library and sent.

 

Nationwide Building Society

Nationwide House

Pipers way

Swindon

SN38 1NW

 

WITHOUT PREDJUDICE

 

Dear Sir,

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER:

 

I have held the above mentioned current account with your bank for the past 5 years. During this time I have incurred charges for going overdrawn due to bounced direct debits, and unauthorised overdraft fees & Interest.

 

It is my opinion, and that of the Office of Fair Trading (OFT), that these charges are punitive in nature, not a genuine pre-estimate of cost and not intended to re-imburse your losses for a breach of contract occurring. Further to the 1999 Consumer Credit Regulations quoted by the OFT, there are numerous cases in law that prove that punitive charges in contracts are unenforceable at English law.

 

Murray v Leasureplay (2004)

Dunlop Tyre Company v New Garage and Motor Co. (1915)

Bridge v. Campbell Discount Co. Ltd. (1962)

 

There are many more cases of this type far more than I have room to list here.

 

Further to these cases, I also believe these charges to be a direct breach of the 1977 Unfair Terms (contracts) Act which require that contract terms be reasonable. I do not believe these charges are reasonable as outlined in the aforementioned act.

 

With this in mind, I respectfully request that you return to me ALL charges made on this account in the last 5 years within 7 days of receipt of this letter by way of personal cheque. If you choose not to do so, I will start proceedings for recovery in the County Courts, as I believe that legally I am entitled to this money back. By doing so, you will be eligible for my court costs and for an extra 8% APR as allowed by the County Courts Act (1984). I also request the default and ‘late payment’ records related to this account to be removed from the files of credit reference agencies, Experian and Equifax, as they were put there by yourselves, in relation to these charges.

 

Further to this, if you decide NOT to accept my offer of settlement of this issue, I would like to make a formal request under the Data Protection Act (1998) for a complete and exhaustive list of all charges made on this account over the last 5 years. As you are no doubt aware, you are afforded 40 days to comply with this request or you must request an extension from the Information Commissioner. If you are of any doubt that this information is covered by the act, may I respectfully draw your attention to the case of Durant v FSA 2003 where the judge ruled that bank statement information is indeed personal information and thus covered. In any event, this information is requested with a view to prospective legal action on my part and therefore would be covered under the same act.

 

 

 

 

I have not received a list of charges from the bank as stated in the letter.

:?

 

What action should I take next ?

 

many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello!

 

got a response from nationwide, I've scanned it as its too long to type!

 

links here:

 

http://img374.imageshack.us/img374/652/nationwide13ra.jpg

http://img98.imageshack.us/img98/2008/nationwide20oe.jpg

 

 

Also here is the text from the original letter which I modified slightly from the library and sent.

 

Nationwide Building Society

Nationwide House

Pipers way

Swindon

SN38 1NW

 

WITHOUT PREDJUDICE

 

Dear Sir,

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER:

 

I have held the above mentioned current account with your bank for the past 5 years. During this time I have incurred charges for going overdrawn due to bounced direct debits, and unauthorised overdraft fees & Interest.

 

It is my opinion, and that of the Office of Fair Trading (OFT), that these charges are punitive in nature, not a genuine pre-estimate of cost and not intended to re-imburse your losses for a breach of contract occurring. Further to the 1999 Consumer Credit Regulations quoted by the OFT, there are numerous cases in law that prove that punitive charges in contracts are unenforceable at English law.

 

Murray v Leasureplay (2004)

Dunlop Tyre Company v New Garage and Motor Co. (1915)

Bridge v. Campbell Discount Co. Ltd. (1962)

 

There are many more cases of this type far more than I have room to list here.

 

Further to these cases, I also believe these charges to be a direct breach of the 1977 Unfair Terms (contracts) Act which require that contract terms be reasonable. I do not believe these charges are reasonable as outlined in the aforementioned act.

 

With this in mind, I respectfully request that you return to me ALL charges made on this account in the last 5 years within 7 days of receipt of this letter by way of personal cheque. If you choose not to do so, I will start proceedings for recovery in the County Courts, as I believe that legally I am entitled to this money back. By doing so, you will be eligible for my court costs and for an extra 8% APR as allowed by the County Courts Act (1984). I also request the default and ‘late payment’ records related to this account to be removed from the files of credit reference agencies, Experian and Equifax, as they were put there by yourselves, in relation to these charges.

 

Further to this, if you decide NOT to accept my offer of settlement of this issue, I would like to make a formal request under the Data Protection Act (1998) for a complete and exhaustive list of all charges made on this account over the last 5 years. As you are no doubt aware, you are afforded 40 days to comply with this request or you must request an extension from the Information Commissioner. If you are of any doubt that this information is covered by the act, may I respectfully draw your attention to the case of Durant v FSA 2003 where the judge ruled that bank statement information is indeed personal information and thus covered. In any event, this information is requested with a view to prospective legal action on my part and therefore would be covered under the same act.

 

 

 

 

I have not received a list of charges from the bank as stated in the letter.

:?

 

What action should I take next ?

 

many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest enforcer

ive had exactly the same reply from the same woman miss dannielle block..ive sent a second letter off today insisting that her charges are not transparant as i asked for a detailed breakdown of them in my last letter but she still failed to supply one..so i insisted on a refund of all charges within 14 days or i will proceed with my claim including interest and court costs which i enclosed an account of using the template in the library...totalling an extra £270 on top of the charges...hopefully they will either ignore this letter or refund the charges....ill let you all know in a fortnight

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest enforcer

ive had exactly the same reply from the same woman miss dannielle block..ive sent a second letter off today insisting that her charges are not transparant as i asked for a detailed breakdown of them in my last letter but she still failed to supply one..so i insisted on a refund of all charges within 14 days or i will proceed with my claim including interest and court costs which i enclosed an account of using the template in the library...totalling an extra £270 on top of the charges...hopefully they will either ignore this letter or refund the charges....ill let you all know in a fortnight

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would phone and remind them that you made an official request under the DPA for a list of charges and that the clock is ticking - they have only 40 days to comply.

 

Ask if they should view tje lack of response regarding the DPA request as a refusal - in which case report them to the IC straight away.

 

He might eventually get the message that banks are not complying.

 

Thanks,

 

I will also try my luck for a list of charges in a branch on my lunch hour tomorrow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would phone and remind them that you made an official request under the DPA for a list of charges and that the clock is ticking - they have only 40 days to comply.

 

Ask if they should view tje lack of response regarding the DPA request as a refusal - in which case report them to the IC straight away.

 

He might eventually get the message that banks are not complying.

 

Thanks,

 

I will also try my luck for a list of charges in a branch on my lunch hour tomorrow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ive had exactly the same reply from the same woman miss dannielle block..ive sent a second letter off today insisting that her charges are not transparant as i asked for a detailed breakdown of them in my last letter but she still failed to supply one..so i insisted on a refund of all charges within 14 days or i will proceed with my claim including interest and court costs which i enclosed an account of using the template in the library...totalling an extra £270 on top of the charges...hopefully they will either ignore this letter or refund the charges....ill let you all know in a fortnight

 

they must just be sending out a standard reply to most people, in hope that we forget about it. How wrong are they!

Link to post
Share on other sites

ive had exactly the same reply from the same woman miss dannielle block..ive sent a second letter off today insisting that her charges are not transparant as i asked for a detailed breakdown of them in my last letter but she still failed to supply one..so i insisted on a refund of all charges within 14 days or i will proceed with my claim including interest and court costs which i enclosed an account of using the template in the library...totalling an extra £270 on top of the charges...hopefully they will either ignore this letter or refund the charges....ill let you all know in a fortnight

 

they must just be sending out a standard reply to most people, in hope that we forget about it. How wrong are they!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I managed to get all the statements from a branch today and have worked out the costs of the charges, using the excel sheet from the library.

 

should I send another similar letter to the one I sent above what wording should I change ?

 

thanks for your help :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I managed to get all the statements from a branch today and have worked out the costs of the charges, using the excel sheet from the library.

 

should I send another similar letter to the one I sent above what wording should I change ?

 

thanks for your help :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I also had the standard letter, and i've now started action against them. It seems that their way of dealing with people who respond to the standard letter is to ignore them.

 

I sent 2 letters after getting their standard reply letter and have heard nothing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

right, they have had another letter with no response. Their time is up now. Just about to do the moneyclaim form.

 

Just wondering can I also put the bit about removing the default in the particulars of claim?

 

thanks

 

Before you go further,

 

Have you got a copy of the direct debit? Was it signed by you? Who was the beneficiary.

Link to post
Share on other sites

right, they have had another letter with no response. Their time is up now. Just about to do the moneyclaim form.

 

Just wondering can I also put the bit about removing the default in the particulars of claim?

 

thanks

 

Before you go further,

 

Have you got a copy of the direct debit? Was it signed by you? Who was the beneficiary.

 

No, I don't there is no copy of it as fair as I am aware, i've tried for 2 years to get information off them about it without any luck, if there is anything signed it wont be by me, it was for a telephone company who I don't even use!

 

I am not mentioning that in the court bit, as the charges are unfair anyway thats what I was putting in my claim. So, do I add the default details to the claim or not ?

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes bu I am getting curious about this direct debit.

 

I don't think that you should take any more action for a moment.

Have you sent a DPA request for the direct debit or evidence of it?

Have you got anything in witing which refers to it?

 

It seems to me to be very important to your case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Which is the telephone company?

Have you put a dpa request in to them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...

This topic was closed on 03/05/19.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support their.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1872 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...