Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Lloyds TSB - Mis-sold PPI


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5690 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone.

 

I have been asked by my brother to look into his loan account with Lloyds TSB Bank PLC

 

He took a loan out on 13th June 2008 for £2600 - refinancing his existing loan. He took out payment protection insurance for over £900 making the total payable excluding interest at just over £3500

 

The monthly repayments are £99.00 x 60 months = £5940

 

On or around end of August 2008 my brother fell out of work and claimed Job Seekers allowance from the Job Centre. This was awarded, on 18th August 2008.

 

The payment protection insurance company “Lloyds TSB Insurance services Limited” refused his claim, saying he does not qualify. There reasoning being that 30 days had not elapsed since taking out the policy.

 

Below are two letters, which I have drafted on behalf of my brother, which I plan to send out.

 

I also asked the bank manger to send my brother copies of the agreement and T&Cs which he agreed to do as he had them in his branch.

 

Theses however have not been received and so need to send a formal request under CCA 2006 to get them.

 

I have done theses before under my own debts but they are covered under CCA 1974 and do not have a template for the new 2006 act. Could any one point me in the right direction?

 

Regards

Dave - UK26

 

[Letters now scanning - available soon]

 

Letter to PPI Company

letter1.JPG

letter2.JPG

 

Letter to Lloyds TSB

letter3.JPG

letter4.JPG

Edited by UK26
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think so. The CCA 2006 superseded some of the provisions of the 1974 act but I think your right to request a copy of an agreement from any date is still within the 1974 act. As far as I know

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

Section 7 of the CCA 2006 says

 

7 Further provision relating to statements

(1) In section 78 of the 1974 Act (duty to give information to debtor under runningaccount

credit agreement) after subsection (4) insert—

 

 

 

here is what i plan to send

 

letter5.JPG

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure if you need paragraph 3 as that is aimed at DCAs and other assignees of debts.

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok.

 

I feel sorry for my brother; it looks as if he has been stitched up by the bank

 

He does not know anything about loans or credit cards and was under the impression when leaving the bank today, that £900 payment protection insurance covered the interest of the loan aswell.

 

I really had to point out to him that it did not, and he as been advised incorrectly by the bank. Simply showed him the figures I worked out and he did not believe me.

 

 

Loan Amount £2600

Payment Protection Insurance £900

 

Total £3500

 

Monthly Repayments £99.00 over 60 months = £5940

 

Worked out the Interest £5940 - £3500 = £2440

 

I really fill like going and confronting the girl who advised him today.

 

actually ill do better then that, i will file a complaint with Trading Standards

 

does my brother have grounds to withhold payment??

 

I am not 100% sure, but personally i think its best to hind behind S77 CCA 1974 after 12 days then withold payment, until they have resolved the dispute

 

Not sure if you need paragraph 3 as that is aimed at DCAs and other assignees of debts.
Link to post
Share on other sites

hello uk26,

 

I have been asked by my brother to look into his loan account with Lloyds TSB Bank PLC

 

He took a loan out on 13th June 2008 for £2600 - refinancing his existing loan. He took out payment protection insurance for over £900 making the total payable plus interest at just over £3500

 

The monthly repayments are £99.00 x 60 months = £5940

 

On or around end of August (is this month correct?) 2008 my brother feel out of work and claimed Job Seekers allowance from the Job Centre. This was awarded, on 18th August 2008.

 

The payment protection insurance company “Lloyds TSB Insurance services Limited” refused his claim, saying he does not qualify. There reasoning being that 30 days had not elapsed since taking out the policy.

You will need to clarify if the 30 day rule applied or not as your dates do not match.

 

Below are two letters, which I have drafted on behalf of my brother, which I plan to send out.

 

I also asked the bank manger to send my brother copies of the agreement and T&Cs which he agreed to do as he had them in his branch.

 

Theses however have not been received and so need to send a formal request under CCA 2006 to get them.

 

I have done theses before under my own debts but they are covered under CCA 1974 and do not have a template for the new 2006 act. Could any one point me in the right direction?

These links may help I believe there were amendments/additions to the 1974 Act in 2006 (see the links below) but the 1974 Act is I believe, still the main legal statute that you should use.

Consumer Credit Act 2006

http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2006...0060014_en.pdf

Consumer Credit Agreements amendments 2004

http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2004/uksi_20041482_en.pdf

OFT Credit changes and APR

http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/con...dit/oft144.pdf

 

 

I would ask you to confirm date of agreement, date of loss of job just to check on the 30 day rule.

 

Hope this helps you out

 

aa

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it possible that the policy commenced after the loan did? Or are they just playing the usual 'we will do anything to avoid paying out insurance' game?

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why can't banks be simple and fair with there customers insted of looking for aways not to pay the insurance claim.

 

 

 

I have sent them proof of the date he claimed JSA

 

Loan agreement signed 13/06/2008

 

JSA.JPG

Edited by UK26
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...