Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided? I am now in a position to clear the debt either by lump sum or a few large installments - Is this something i should look into at this late stage? Thanks as always in advance
    • I have now received my SAR. It includes a great deal of information! Is there a time limit on how long account information is kept and/or can be provided to debtors? I have received many account statements which were not previously sent to me. I remember that the creditor should provide explanations of any acronyms and abbreviations that maybe used in the documents. Is this still the case? Also what, if any, are the regulations in regard to adding fees to a debt? Can fees be added to a debt after the court has approved a charge on a property. Perhaps due to the numerous owners of the debt, many payments I made were not properly recorded on the account, some were entered over a year after the payment was made! Following the Legal Charge, I paid every month until my payments were refused. I am trying to compute the over payments, but the addition of fees etc. is confusing me. Any comments and/or help would be appreciated.
    • did you submit your directions
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Shortfall Court Summons - URGENT help needed please!


inafix
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4948 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I haven't had any reply from the solicitors re my Pt 18 request.

 

Do I just leave it at that and wait until I hear from the court?

 

What docs do they need to provide to the court before they can pursue the claim?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...
  • Replies 204
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I have just received a leter from my local court titled:

 

'General Form of Judgment Order

 

It is ordered that the parties must file their Allocation Questionnaires, and any fee payable, by 3rd December and in default their respective cases will be struck out automatically.

 

Where default is by the defendant, the claimant will be at liberty to enter judgment forthwith and any counterclaim will be struck out.

 

Where the default is by the claimant, the defendant be at liberty to enter judgment forthwith on any counterclaim.'

 

What is an allocation questionnaire?

What do i have to do now, as they haven't given me much time.

I haven't heard anything from my pt18 request.

 

Urgent help and advice neeeded please guys.

Link to post
Share on other sites

After they received your Defence, the court should have sent out an allocation questionnaire. It is a peach colour form. You can also download one from http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/courtfinder/forms/n150.pdf . If that address hasnt come out fully, just do a google search on: n150 allocation questionnaire.

 

You need to complete this as fully as possible and it is ESSENTIAL that you get it to the court in time.

 

You are the defendant so do not have to pay a fee.

 

Make sure you use section I. Attach the part 18 request. State in I that it has not been responded to.

 

Ask at "I" for order that the claimant do answer the part 18 request within 14 days.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You also do need to do some research on the old judgment.

 

This would have been given by the court for the area of the repo'd house. If this is local, go in and ask at the desk otherwise call them. Say that you need an order which was made in about (date) and ask if this will be available. Then give the names of the bank and yourself.

 

If this doesnt help, have a think abut any credit searches that may have been done on you for the 6 years after that order. Organisations who did searches may still have copies. I dont know if the Registry TRust www.trustonline.org.uk can provide details of older judgments.

 

Bear in mind that the claimant should make proper discosure:

1. it should disclose the old judgment

2. it needs to prove its figures - screenshots are not enough

3. it should provide the file of the solicitors who acted on the sale, and the auctioneers/agents file also

4. if it says it cannot find the old judgment, then it should provide a copy of the standard letter of instruction to solicitor agents at the time.

 

Good luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks ndc.

I have not received an allocation questionnaire, but have dowloaded one as you suggested.

However, I do need some help filling it all in correctly.

Can you or anyone else point me in the right direction?

Link to post
Share on other sites

this reply is sent in a hurry!

 

fill in court details in top right and your name in the box on the left.

 

Tick the frst bix. NB copy the form at the end (or print 3 times - you need a copy too) and send one to other party.

 

A - I always recoomend trying to settle so tick boxes 1 & 3. There is probably no point in a stay.

 

B - tick no

 

C - there is no relevant protocol so write N/A

 

D - 1st box is "all" (I assume)

then tick "no", assuming you have made no applications.

 

witnesses - INCLUDE YOURSELF. I doubt there are others. Facts - "all"

 

experts - are you claiming sale at a shortfall? If so tick:

yes

none net obtained

single joint suitable - YES

just write in field of expertise "value of property at date of sale"

oral evidence - "no".

 

Track - tick fast track and write in the box - issues are reasonably straightforward and trial will not take more than 1 day.

 

E

 

1 day

fill in any dates which are not available from(say) March 2009 to Dec 09.

 

F

tick "no" in 1st question

 

G

leave blank

 

H

tick "no"

 

I - as my post yesterday.

 

remember to sign and date and you are done!

 

 

 

 

 

Thanks ndc.

I have not received an allocation questionnaire, but have dowloaded one as you suggested.

However, I do need some help filling it all in correctly.

Can you or anyone else point me in the right direction?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been to the court and handed in the AQ in person.

 

They said because of the amount it has to be multi-track.

 

They also thought it was unlikely it will go to mediation, and that it would be wise to see a solicitor as when it goes to trial I will need a barrister.

 

I have contacted the Registry Trust who informed me that they only keep records back 6 years, so unless the bank have a copy, no-one will!

 

What docs will they have to provide to the court to pursue the claim?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have phoned the county court office this morning to enquire whether the AQ from the bank solicitors had been received.

The clerk there was extremely helpful.

She said nothing has been sent back, therefore the claim will be struck out automatically.

If they send it back late, and want the case reinstated, the judge will want a credible reason as to why it wasn't sent back on time, and that the judge in question would not accept any lame excuse!

Do you think they are likely to pursue this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

fix,

The case now stands struck out, not 'will be'. I suggest you send this letter over to the court office:

 

Dear Sir

 

Re: (Name) v (Name) Case No: (Case Number)

 

I am the Defendant in this case.

 

By the order of District Judge (Name) made (date) it was ordered that unless the Claimant filed a completed allocation questionnaire and paid the fee by 3 December 2008 the claim shall stand struck out. The Claimant has failed to comply with the order and in consequence the claim now stands struck out.

 

I should be pleased if you would treat this letter as my request pursuant to CPR 3.5(2)(a) for the entry of judgment in my favour and for costs in accordance with the costs provision of the said order.

 

I look forward to hearing from you with a record of the judgment as quickly as possible.

 

y/f

 

x20

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will do, thanks.

 

I can't begin to thank everyone enough for all your help and advice (esp. x20 & nick)

 

Is it worth sending a letter to Halifux asking that this case will now be closed and not sent to some other DCA in the future?

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no need to 'ask' Halifax for anything. It was their case and they blew it by failing to comply with an order of the court. Further, what's there for a DCA to buy now? If some DCA should be dim enough to buy this 'debt', you'll be able to tell the DCA that in truth there ain't no such thing since the Halifax litigated over it and lost.

 

x20

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good result!

If you havent yet sent the letter to court though, you might want to wait.

HLX can apply for 'relief from sanctions' and the longer they leave it before they do so, the harder it is to pursuade the court to grant this. Many people therefore wait a while as a court order may 'wake up' the other party.

 

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

NOW WHAT'S GOING ON?

 

I have just received a letter from banks sols with a copy of their AQ dated 12 Dec. as last date for filing.

 

How did they get more time and why did I not know?

 

Also enclosed is docs that I have been requesting since Jan!!

 

(Mortgage Deed, Mortgage Offer, Valuation reports), but no Repossesion Order or Judgment.

 

HELP, what do I do now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The next stage is that the Court will consider the allocation questionnaires with the claim and defence. The Court will either set a date for a case management hearing, or will give orders to get the case ready for Trial.

 

For the moment, just write back to the bank to thank them for the documents but to point out what is missing.

 

Which Court is the case in?

 

NOW WHAT'S GOING ON?

 

 

HELP, what do I do now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have spoken to court office this morning. They were too late.

Case was struck out.

 

If claimant wants to have case reinstated, the judge will want good reason as to why They did not reply in time (and why they altered the date).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have spoken to court office this morning. They were too late.

Case was struck out.

 

If claimant wants to have case reinstated, the judge will want good reason as to why They did not reply in time (and why they altered the date).

 

 

This is great news. :D

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Inafix.....i've read through your plight, i'm not knowledgable of this, a free consultation with a solicitor via CAB might be a good option or a local Law Centre - The Law Centres Federation a call to the National Debtline would probably be a good option too (free and impartial) - National Debtline – Free, Confidential Debt Advice – Call 0808 808 4000

 

Site team are aware....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Inafix,

 

Does the Notice say if you are required or allowed to attend.

 

 

Please confirm what the Notice rec'd from court actually says.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

It says I should attend.

 

Have seen a solicitor who says to ask for an adjournment and suggests now contacting lender direct to offer a F & F settlement.

 

Not sure of exact wording on court letter as sol. now has all my paperwork.

 

It said a strike out would not be in the interest of justice, and the fault of returning their allocation questionnaire late, was due to absences?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi IaF,

 

This advice is, IMHO, surely flawed. :confused:

 

Unless and until the case actually IS re-instated, it remains Struck Out and you are compelled to pay zero. :mad:

 

Whilst you are slightly "ahead" at this stage, why on earth go back to negotiating. I'd have waited to see if the court allowed their case to be re-instated and I'd have attended to argue that it should NOT be.

 

However, if the papers are still with your sol'rs, I assume you have instructed them to act. You should probably therefore take the advice for which you are paying. :(

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Thanks slick.

 

Solicitor and myself attended court and argued case should not be reinstated, but judge said it was the fault of Hbos sols., and not Hbos themselves, who were to blame for discrepancies, so case will go ahead.

Judge ordered that Possession Order must be produced within 14 days or case will remain struck out.

 

Judge also said that I had a strong defence against them claiming back all the interest.

 

My sol said F&F will be a 'last resort', and IF they do come up with a P/O, will contact a barrister who deals solely with cases such as this for advice on the best way forward.

 

I have mentioned all the advice given to me on here to my Sol. which has been extremely helpful. Thanks guys, keep it coming.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 9 months later...

OMG!!!

Have today received a 'new' Claim Form from the court. (same particulars of claim as before (actually for slightly less?) and the same sols.)

Can they do this???

Court ordered that the claim remains struck out as the claimant has not complied with the conditions for reinstatement imposed by the order of 10th March 2009, as of 1st April 2009.

They did not pay the court fees nor my solicitors fees for attending court.

What should I put in the acknowledgement of service?

PLEASE HELP, I'm at a loss and really can't afford the solicitor again!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...