Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have received a PCN from Euro Car Parks for MFG - Esso Cobham - Gravesend. I was completely unaware that there was any such limit for parking and always considered this to be a service station. I stopped there to use the toilet, have a coffee and made a couple of work calls. I have read the previous topics on this location which suggest I can ignore this and ECP will not take legal action. The one possible complication is that the vehicle is leased by my employer so I do not want to involve them with the associated reminders and threatening letters. The PCN was first issued to the leasing company Arval who have notified ECP of the hiring company. I have attached a copy of the PCN Notice to Hirer with details removed as per instructions. What options do I have or should I just pay the PCN promptly at the reduced rate of £60? img20240424_23142631.pdf
    • What you have uploaded is a letter with daft empty threats from third-party paper tigers.  Just ignore it. What we need to see is the original invoice you received last October or November.
    • Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Capone/cabot v OH (disputed Acc)


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3321 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi BC,

 

It may be best for them to take this to court.

 

If it's proved enforceable, then the Income & Exp're budget planner should enable you to repay the date at an affordable rate. You'd have a CCJ against you. Have you been Defaulted yet on this a/c.

 

If it's NOT enfoceable, you can repay again at an affordable rate and they can't add interest or penalties.

 

Going back through your thread, I see mention has been made about penalty charges but no action taken to reclaim them. This is something positive you could be doing.

 

Do you have all the required statements.

 

 

If its not enforceable then they can't force you to apy anything. Anything you pay would be classed as a voluntary payment. You may want to consider how much interest you have already paid them because that would in reality be repayment of capital if agreement was unenforceable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 455
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I did S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) them but Statements incomplete which is another 'grip' I have with them. Charges and penalties amount to about only £200 against a balance of about £8,500. Always paid on time until we hit the buffers this year due to a business where we worked going bust, which this lot dont understand - one minute we had a joint income of £75k+, then crashes to around £25k.

 

Mostly, charges/penalties have been added while in dispute, which brings me to ask who has the final word as to whether an account is in dispute, I say they have not resolved a thing but ms renshaw says that she doesnt consider it in dispute.

 

PS. Yes they have defaulted.

Edited by beachcomber60
PS added
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Slick, sorry for going on a bit, really getting depressed feeling as if Iam sinking into quicksands. Their adding more to the debt each month then I'm paying.

 

The only real advice seems to be from this forum.

 

BC, WHY does this bother you??

 

1) You can claim them all back

 

or

 

2) They can't enforce the agreement, so they can add whatever they want.

 

 

Just start charging them £35 everytime you send them a letter, will they pay it? The simple answer is NO, of course they won't, but neither will you.

 

You have been treated no better or no worse than any other CapOne customer, it's the way they work.

 

I haven't read through the whole thread, but you have three choices, take it (edited) for the six years until the debt is Stat barred, this will involve the debt being passed to every pondlife out there. They will not leave you alone and will carry on exactly the same way as they are now.

 

Two, they take you to Court, you defend on the 'Non Enforceable' CCA, you may win, debt written off, or you may lose (Cabot have won a couple recently with the CCA that you have) and the Judge tells you what you have to pay back.

 

Three, work out what your charges are, what the account balance owing is and reclaim your charges. If the charges are more than the balance, you make a few quid and the debt is gone. If the charges do not cover the balance, it'll be a hell of a lot smaller.

 

JOgs

Edited by slick132
please keep it clean, thanks
Link to post
Share on other sites

Two, they take you to Court, you defend on the 'Non Enforceable' CCA, you may win, debt written off, or you may lose (Cabot have won a couple recently with the CCA that you have) and the Judge tells you what you have to pay back.

JOgs

 

Have you got any more info on this - are there any links to threads on here?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you got any more info on this - are there any links to threads on here?

 

Yes, the threads are on here somewhere. My PC crashed and I lost everything I had bookmarked.

 

I think this is one of them

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/95027-cabot-county-court-claim.html?highlight=cabot+threads

 

JOgs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey BC, reclaiming the charges is good, because they can't argue about the account being in dispute while charges are being reclaimed. Might shut them up over the festive period at least!

 

And it doesn't just knock off the charge but also any interest accrued. At Cap One percentages, that can add up.

 

Stay strong. By showing you will fight, you have already got them on the run. Pity you got a numpty at TS. At the CAB you mostly see general advisors, but they also have debt specialists who you can be referred to and have far more experience and training.

Nationwide-A&L-Halifax 1-Student Loans Company-NatWest-Virgin Media-Link-Capital One ALL WON!

Thames Credit -statute barred sent 13/11/08

BCW- prove debt letter- 14/08/08

Apex- CCA 14/08/08

Redcats UK- SAR 14/04/09

Call Serve- CCA 14/08/08

Littlewoods- no CCA letter 03/09/08- Lowells now

Wescot- CCA 19/9/08

Capital One/Debitas- now with Lowells

 

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All information has been obtained from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well in spite of sending a letter to P2C they did send a caller today to speak to me about my account, I refused to discuss it with him, as my neighbours were getting in their car he kept asking if Iam bankrupt or in an iva and if he phoned Capital one would I speak to them, shut the door on him. grabbed my camera and got a photo off his car before getting a copy of letter sent to P2C warning them about door callers then went out opened his car door and told him to read it very carefully.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is well handled, BC. Very coolly done. I'm impressed.

 

They really aren't paying attention to anything you write to them. It's as though they just can't read or something. As for if he phoned Cap1 would you speak to them, how about if he rings and tries to make them listen to you- that would be more use!

Nationwide-A&L-Halifax 1-Student Loans Company-NatWest-Virgin Media-Link-Capital One ALL WON!

Thames Credit -statute barred sent 13/11/08

BCW- prove debt letter- 14/08/08

Apex- CCA 14/08/08

Redcats UK- SAR 14/04/09

Call Serve- CCA 14/08/08

Littlewoods- no CCA letter 03/09/08- Lowells now

Wescot- CCA 19/9/08

Capital One/Debitas- now with Lowells

 

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All information has been obtained from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Emma, woz I angry or wot! I was asleep when he rang the bell.

 

Busy coping everything that TS wont in order to investigate, dont feel very hopeful - chocolate teapot springs to mind.

 

Cheek b***ard parked down the road from our house but I still got a good photo of his car plate, should I pass this onto TS mmmmm......... yes me thinks I will although I think I'll be going it alone to court for harrassment while account in dispute.

 

Its absolutely pointless trying to talk to c1 are their gutter life they just dont want to know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Due to a recent cagbotting for saying exactly what my experience of Capital One has been (and I understand CAG has to be careful about what we say)- I cannot fully express in public what I think of Capital One. After all, the fact they have passed my account, which they admit is still in dispute, on to two different DCAs who have harassed me accordingly, may cloud my impressions a touch.;)

 

I really think they will not listen to reasonable discourse. I only wish they rang me frequently enough for me to take them to task personally! But these days I'm an angry little person who has to get pleasure where I can find it. Its either chocolate or writing angry letters for me...:(

Nationwide-A&L-Halifax 1-Student Loans Company-NatWest-Virgin Media-Link-Capital One ALL WON!

Thames Credit -statute barred sent 13/11/08

BCW- prove debt letter- 14/08/08

Apex- CCA 14/08/08

Redcats UK- SAR 14/04/09

Call Serve- CCA 14/08/08

Littlewoods- no CCA letter 03/09/08- Lowells now

Wescot- CCA 19/9/08

Capital One/Debitas- now with Lowells

 

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All information has been obtained from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi BC,

 

Well done - I doubt they'll be back in a hurry but if they or anyone else turns up, please stay calm and safe - we don't want to have to bail you out on a charge of GBH to a DCA !!;)

 

Hi Emma,

 

Hope the anger subsists - at least angry letters and choccy won't get you into trouble. :eek:

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Believe me Slick, I am having to edit my letters heavily and they would still get me into trouble!

Nationwide-A&L-Halifax 1-Student Loans Company-NatWest-Virgin Media-Link-Capital One ALL WON!

Thames Credit -statute barred sent 13/11/08

BCW- prove debt letter- 14/08/08

Apex- CCA 14/08/08

Redcats UK- SAR 14/04/09

Call Serve- CCA 14/08/08

Littlewoods- no CCA letter 03/09/08- Lowells now

Wescot- CCA 19/9/08

Capital One/Debitas- now with Lowells

 

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All information has been obtained from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi BC,

 

I guess the answer is they do what they want, when they want to and when they're ready.

 

They behave as if they're accountable to no one but they are, sometimes.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

And they will continue to sell it on to their extensive list of DCA monkeys. When one doesn't work and passes it back because the account is in dispute, Cap1 will just sell it on to the next.

 

I'm so glad I stopped paying them- I'd hate to be contributing to the postage on all of these letters...;)

 

Permission to attack the choccy, BC. You've done the angry letters for the day. I've got bored with the choccy and will be on to the Roast Beef and yorkshire puds next. Some days, even choccy is insufficient.

Nationwide-A&L-Halifax 1-Student Loans Company-NatWest-Virgin Media-Link-Capital One ALL WON!

Thames Credit -statute barred sent 13/11/08

BCW- prove debt letter- 14/08/08

Apex- CCA 14/08/08

Redcats UK- SAR 14/04/09

Call Serve- CCA 14/08/08

Littlewoods- no CCA letter 03/09/08- Lowells now

Wescot- CCA 19/9/08

Capital One/Debitas- now with Lowells

 

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All information has been obtained from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Emma, Cant eat anymore choccie - feel sick, although roast beef & Yorkshire pud sounds good.

 

Seriously tho' can't see the point of carrying on paying this lot, don't get any statements or the like have no idea how much they are adding in charges each month and don't even know where our payments are going, certainly don't get any acknowledgement regarding payments received.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Completely confused, the opinion seems to be that I have no grounds disputing account as cca complies. I thought if account unlawful charges that also means account is disputed and the OC has to cease collection enforcement under OFT guidelines?

 

Have sent civil procedures letter, as recommended, no reply and time limit now expired - what's next step.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the CCA is enforceable and you want to try another angle- to reduce the balance of the debt by claiming back the unlawful charges- just follow the usual advice.

 

Add up the charges and any interest these charges have incurred, send the prelim letter asking for them back and putting the account into dispute.

 

You have already done the SAR so should have a full list of charges. Have fun. I think I'm onto this next, if yesterday's CCA is enforceable.

Nationwide-A&L-Halifax 1-Student Loans Company-NatWest-Virgin Media-Link-Capital One ALL WON!

Thames Credit -statute barred sent 13/11/08

BCW- prove debt letter- 14/08/08

Apex- CCA 14/08/08

Redcats UK- SAR 14/04/09

Call Serve- CCA 14/08/08

Littlewoods- no CCA letter 03/09/08- Lowells now

Wescot- CCA 19/9/08

Capital One/Debitas- now with Lowells

 

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All information has been obtained from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi BC,

 

After Steven's opinion on the last page, it seems the agreement may be enforceable. Assuming it is, the next step should be to reclaim charges.

 

While you are doing that, the debt should not be pursued, but it probably still will be. It's not right or fair, but thats the way it seems to be.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Beachcomber, my alleged CCA is EXACTLY the same as yours! So if yours is unenforceable, so is mine.

 

And I have no definite idea or why!

Nationwide-A&L-Halifax 1-Student Loans Company-NatWest-Virgin Media-Link-Capital One ALL WON!

Thames Credit -statute barred sent 13/11/08

BCW- prove debt letter- 14/08/08

Apex- CCA 14/08/08

Redcats UK- SAR 14/04/09

Call Serve- CCA 14/08/08

Littlewoods- no CCA letter 03/09/08- Lowells now

Wescot- CCA 19/9/08

Capital One/Debitas- now with Lowells

 

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All information has been obtained from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...